On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:13:18 -0500, WTF wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:39:06 -0500, Sqwertz > wrote:
>
> -->On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:18:53 -0500, WTF wrote:
> -->
> -->> Ahhhh look brooklyn1 has a groupy, better the groupy bugging him than him
> -->> bugging us.
> -->
> -->Groupy?
> -->
> -->Did't that look odd to you when you typed that? Twice.
> -->
> -->-sw
>
> Spell check didn't catch it so I thought it was ok, but you understood didn't
> you?

I understood. That's why I posted what I did.

> That's all that was expected of brookylin.

You seem to be harboring bad vibes. Think peace and happiness.

-sw

On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:55:23 -0700, sf wrote:

> Apparently his spellcheck is hosed too. Reread what he wrote.

You are so smooth, Barb. Let me run my hand over your wrinkled
bottom.

-sw (eek, it got caught up in the folds)

"Sqwertz" -promised> wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:55:23 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> Apparently his spellcheck is hosed too. Reread what he wrote.
>
> You are so smooth, Barb. Let me run my hand over your wrinkled
> bottom.
>
> -sw (eek, it got caught up in the folds)

That's your own, dood. You can't feel butts over the interweb.

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Peter's "mate" wrote:
>
>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>>
>>>> I ain't the one on the receiving end. LOL
>>>
>>> Sheldon's asshole is so worn out he doesn't even notice anymore.
>>>
>> You know this how ?
>
> Isn't it obvious?

Apparently not or many wouldn't be asking

As Stu pointed out, Sheldon *is* on the receiving end,
> and he doesn't even realize it!


seems either you are wrong or he doesn't give credence to your opinions
which imho is a credible decision
>
> I'll grant that you and your "mates" have greater insight into such
> things, so if you can shed light on the phenomenon, by all means expound
> away.
mates ?
in your case a number of unnsuported allegations and equally lame sock
puppets

A particularly smart man once said


"You have two ears and one mouth
one should use them in proportion "
>
> Bob
I have no interest in attempting to debate you bobby , another comment
on your braying might be

" Never argue with an fool as he will drag you down to his level and
beat you with experience "

Peter's "mate" wrote:

>>>> Sheldon's asshole is so worn out he doesn't even notice anymore.
>>>>
>>> You know this how ?
>>
>> Isn't it obvious?
>
> Apparently not or many wouldn't be asking

"Many"? *You're* the only one who asked! Everybody else figured it out on
their own. Do you somehow think of yourself as a multitude?



> As Stu pointed out, Sheldon *is* on the receiving end, and he doesn't
> even realize it!
>
> seems either you are wrong or he doesn't give credence to your opinions
> which imho is a credible decision

Wrong that Stu wrote what he did? Are you DRUNK? Or just so stupid you can't
remember what has already been written in this thread?



> I have no interest in attempting to debate you bobby, another comment on
> your braying might be
>
> "Never argue with an fool as he will drag you down to his level and beat
> you with experience "

And a comment on YOUR braying would be "A coward runs away knowing he's
already been defeated before conflict has even been joined." Run along,
then, little coward.

Bob

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 02:15:22 -0500, Sqwertz -promised>
wrote:

-->On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:55:23 -0700, sf wrote:
-->
-->> Apparently his spellcheck is hosed too. Reread what he wrote.
-->
-->You are so smooth, Barb. Let me run my hand over your wrinkled
-->bottom.
-->
-->-sw (eek, it got caught up in the folds)

EEwwwwwwwwww

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:22:18 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

-->Peter's "mate" wrote:
-->
-->>> Sheldon wrote:
-->>>
-->>>> I ain't the one on the receiving end. LOL
-->>>
-->>> Sheldon's asshole is so worn out he doesn't even notice anymore.
-->>>
-->> You know this how ?
-->
-->Isn't it obvious? As Stu pointed out, Sheldon *is* on the receiving end, and
-->he doesn't even realize it!

Well it seems to me that goes around comes around, Sheldon shits on alot of
people and it seems he's getting some payback which doesn't surprise me in the
least.
I don't have issues with him, I'd just like him to stop attacking my posts and
I'd leave him alone.

-->
-->I'll grant that you and your "mates" have greater insight into such things,
-->so if you can shed light on the phenomenon, by all means expound away.
-->
-->Bob

On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:12:20 +1000, atec 7 7 <"atec > wrote:

-->Bob Terwilliger wrote:
-->> Sheldon wrote:
-->>
-->>> I ain't the one on the receiving end. LOL
-->>
-->> Sheldon's asshole is so worn out he doesn't even notice anymore.
-->>
-->> Bob
-->You know this how ?
-->

You actually want an answer?

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:48:07 +0200, Giusi wrote:

> "WTF" ha scritto nel messaggio
> "brooklyn1" wrote:
>
>> -->You illiterate *What The ***** _*******_... I ain't the one on the
>> receiving > -->end. LOL
>>
>> You already are, and just haven't realized it yet.
>
> Come on, Sheldon thinks everyone here either 1) has the hots for him or 2)
> is scared of him or 3) both. It's all the thrill left to him.

i am woman, hear me roar!

your pal,
sheldon

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 03:36:45 -0400, cyberpurrs wrote:

> "Sqwertz" -promised> wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:55:23 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> Apparently his spellcheck is hosed too. Reread what he wrote.
>>
>> You are so smooth, Barb. Let me run my hand over your wrinkled
>> bottom.
>>
>> -sw (eek, it got caught up in the folds)
>
> That's your own, dood. You can't feel butts over the interweb.

damned shame, isn't it?

your flatbutt pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 03:36:45 -0400, cyberpurrs wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" -promised> wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:55:23 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>
>>>> Apparently his spellcheck is hosed too. Reread what he wrote.
>>>
>>> You are so smooth, Barb. Let me run my hand over your wrinkled
>>> bottom.
>>>
>>> -sw (eek, it got caught up in the folds)
>>
>> That's your own, dood. You can't feel butts over the interweb.
>
> damned shame, isn't it?
>
> your flatbutt pal,
> blake

haha

ffu wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:12:20 +1000, atec 7 7 <"atec > wrote:
>
> -->Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> -->> Sheldon wrote:
> -->>
> -->>> I ain't the one on the receiving end. LOL
> -->>
> -->> Sheldon's asshole is so worn out he doesn't even notice anymore.
> -->>
> -->> Bob
> -->You know this how ?
> -->
>
> You actually want an answer?
I expected some idiocy but basically was thinking rhetorically

blake murphy wrote:

> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:41:55 -0700, Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq. wrote:
>
>
> >cybercat wrote:
> >
> >>"WTF" wrote in message
> . ..
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:40:39 GMT, "brooklyn1" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>-->
> >>>-->"Dave Smith" wrote in message
> m...
> >>>-->> brooklyn1 wrote:
> >>>-->>> "Bob TwiLIAR" wrote
> >>>-->>>> Sheldon wrote:
> >>>-->>>>
> >>>-->>>>> But none of it's true.
> >>>-->>>
> >>>-->>> Show us, LIAR! It's obvious that I intimidate you, I mean REALLY
> >>>-->>> INTIMIDATE
> >>>-->>
> >>>-->>
> >>>-->> No, not. The word is "irritate".
> >>>-->
> >>>-->That too. Actually I down right bug he shit out of that
> raghead, but
> >>>mostly
> >>>-->I intimidate him because he's a LIAR!
> >>>-->
> >>>-->
> >>>
> >>>OH! A little racial profiling, or is it just racism in it's purest
> form.
> >>
> >>Good God, it's like a battle between the good, the bad and the really,
> >>really ugly. Only the Good doesn't show up.
> >>
> >
> >My knee jerks instinctually every now and then but when it does im
> >capable of restraining my self from running around shouting LIAR! LIAR!
> >LIAR! I can just see a young Sheldon adding "PANTS ON FIRE!" while he
> >chases some poor kid around the playground.
>
>
> i seriously doubt sheldon was the one doing the chasing. more likely the
> chased, caught, and repeatedly pounded.
>
> your pal,
> blake


Actualy, now that i think about it, that does make more sense.

He learned his passive aggressive behavior somewhere apparently hes no
different than a school boy victem at his adult version of his playing
out of his early training.

Apparently his 'navy' trianing didnt do much for either his self estieem
or his sence of duty and discipline.

Do you suppose he really dont see the way he looks when he goes from
normal conversation to foaming at the mouth screeming obscentites?

I mean, come on, i get the idea of the fool i must seem in my
pretentious esoteric and mispelled lugubrious verbiosety, my harping on
recherche curiosities and a tendencie to quote 19th century English
mystical poetry, but come on!


To chose in this medium to come across as a raving lunatic seems an odd
choice to me, even if i felt as strongly as Sheldons SCREEMING implied
he does, even if it were an act a conscious choice of style, why choose
to play that role? What makes a person think an unpredictably rude
person would be worth paying attention to? more so i mean than makeing
shure they dont sneak up on you.

He has one of his little hissy fits and i immidently think of David
Shapiro's words ....."Let me explain what i mean by "neruotic styles."
By "style" I mean a form or mode of functioning - the way or manner of a
given area of behavior - that is identifiable, in an individual, through
a range of his specific acts. By "neruotic styles," i mean those modes
of functioning that seem characteristic, repectively, of the various
nerotic conditions. I shall consider here, particialry, ways of
thinking and perceiving, ways of experiencing emoitions, modes of
subective experience in genreal, and modes of activity that are
associated with various pathologies. It is not my aim to be exhasutive
nor even sytematic, and it is clear that there are many interesting
aspects of style that cannot even be touched on here - for examplee,
body - movement styles. But i hope to provide at least an outline of
four major neurotic styles: obsessive-compulsive, paranoid, hysterical,
and impulsive."

David Shapiro "Neurotic Styles"
Basic Book Inc. 1965

--

Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.

Domine, dirige nos.
Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky.../sf_anthem.mp3

On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:49:31 -0700, Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq. wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:41:55 -0700, Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>My knee jerks instinctually every now and then but when it does im
>>>capable of restraining my self from running around shouting LIAR! LIAR!
>>>LIAR! I can just see a young Sheldon adding "PANTS ON FIRE!" while he
>>>chases some poor kid around the playground.
>>
>>
>> i seriously doubt sheldon was the one doing the chasing. more likely the
>> chased, caught, and repeatedly pounded.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> Actualy, now that i think about it, that does make more sense.
>
> He learned his passive aggressive behavior somewhere apparently hes no
> different than a school boy victem at his adult version of his playing
> out of his early training.
>
> Apparently his 'navy' trianing didnt do much for either his self estieem
> or his sence of duty and discipline.
>
> Do you suppose he really dont see the way he looks when he goes from
> normal conversation to foaming at the mouth screeming obscentites?
>

fruitcake is as fruitcake does.

>
> To chose in this medium to come across as a raving lunatic seems an odd
> choice to me, even if i felt as strongly as Sheldons SCREEMING implied
> he does, even if it were an act a conscious choice of style, why choose
> to play that role? What makes a person think an unpredictably rude
> person would be worth paying attention to? more so i mean than makeing
> shure they dont sneak up on you.
>
> He has one of his little hissy fits and i immidently think of David
> Shapiro's words ....."Let me explain what i mean by "neruotic styles."
> By "style" I mean a form or mode of functioning - the way or manner of a
> given area of behavior - that is identifiable, in an individual, through
> a range of his specific acts. By "neruotic styles," i mean those modes
> of functioning that seem characteristic, repectively, of the various
> nerotic conditions.

my vote is for narcissistic personality disorder:

A person with narcissistic personality disorder:

* Reacts to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation
* Takes advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals
* Has feelings of self-importance
* Exaggerates achievements and talents
* Is preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty,
intelligence, or ideal love
* Has unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment
* Requires constant attention and admiration
* Disregards the feelings of others, lacks empathy
* Has obsessive self-interest
* Pursues mainly selfish goals

<https://www.google.com/health/ref/Narcissistic+personality+disorder>

....but on the other hand, i hear the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders V is being held up while they rewrite sheldon's section.

your pal,
blake

On Sep 3, 9:39*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:18:53 -0500, WTF wrote:
> > Ahhhh look brooklyn1 has a groupy, better the groupy bugging him than him
> > bugging us.
>
> Groupy?
>
> Did't that look odd to you when you typed that? *Twice.
>
> -sw

"Did't " ?

: ))

blake diagnosed:

> my vote is for narcissistic personality disorder:
>
> A person with narcissistic personality disorder:
>
> * Reacts to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation
> * Takes advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals
> * Has feelings of self-importance
> * Exaggerates achievements and talents
> * Is preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty,
> intelligence, or ideal love
> * Has unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment
> * Requires constant attention and admiration
> * Disregards the feelings of others, lacks empathy
> * Has obsessive self-interest
> * Pursues mainly selfish goals
>
> <https://www.google.com/health/ref/Narcissistic+personality+disorder>

ICD-10 contains something called "emotionally unstable personality
disorder." See if this list sounds familiar:

Disorders of adult personality and behaviour

1. There is evidence that the individual's characteristic and enduring
patterns of inner experience and behaviour as a whole deviate markedly from
the culturally expected and accepted range (or "norm"). Such deviation must
be manifest in more than one of the following areas:

A. cognition (i.e., ways of perceiving and interpreting things, people, and
events; forming attitudes and images of self and others);
B. affectivity (range, intensity, and appropriateness of emotional
arousal and response);
C. control over impulses and gratification of needs;
D. manner of relating to others and of handling interpersonal situations.


2. The deviation must manifest itself pervasively as behaviour that is
inflexible, maladaptive, or otherwise dysfunctional across a broad range of
personal and social situations (i.e., not being limited to one specific
"triggering" stimulus or situation).

At least three of the following must be present, one of which must be (2):

(1) marked tendency to act unexpectedly and without consideration of the
consequences;

(2) marked tendency to quarrelsome behaviour and to conflicts with others,
especially when impulsive acts are thwarted or criticized;

(3) liability to outbursts of anger or violence, with inability to control
the resulting behavioural explosions;

(4) difficulty in maintaining any course of action that offers no immediate
reward;

(5) unstable and capricious mood.


Bob

On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:55:19 -0700, Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> blake diagnosed:
>
>> my vote is for narcissistic personality disorder:
>>
>> A person with narcissistic personality disorder:
>>
>> * Reacts to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation
>> * Takes advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals
>> * Has feelings of self-importance
>> * Exaggerates achievements and talents
>> * Is preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty,
>> intelligence, or ideal love
>> * Has unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment
>> * Requires constant attention and admiration
>> * Disregards the feelings of others, lacks empathy
>> * Has obsessive self-interest
>> * Pursues mainly selfish goals
>>
>> <https://www.google.com/health/ref/Narcissistic+personality+disorder>
>
> ICD-10 contains something called "emotionally unstable personality
> disorder." See if this list sounds familiar:
>
> Disorders of adult personality and behaviour
>
> 1. There is evidence that the individual's characteristic and enduring
> patterns of inner experience and behaviour as a whole deviate markedly from
> the culturally expected and accepted range (or "norm"). Such deviation must
> be manifest in more than one of the following areas:
>
> A. cognition (i.e., ways of perceiving and interpreting things, people, and
> events; forming attitudes and images of self and others);
> B. affectivity (range, intensity, and appropriateness of emotional
> arousal and response);
> C. control over impulses and gratification of needs;
> D. manner of relating to others and of handling interpersonal situations.
>
> 2. The deviation must manifest itself pervasively as behaviour that is
> inflexible, maladaptive, or otherwise dysfunctional across a broad range of
> personal and social situations (i.e., not being limited to one specific
> "triggering" stimulus or situation).
>
> At least three of the following must be present, one of which must be (2):
>
> (1) marked tendency to act unexpectedly and without consideration of the
> consequences;
>
> (2) marked tendency to quarrelsome behaviour and to conflicts with others,
> especially when impulsive acts are thwarted or criticized;
>
> (3) liability to outbursts of anger or violence, with inability to control
> the resulting behavioural explosions;
>
> (4) difficulty in maintaining any course of action that offers no immediate
> reward;
>
> (5) unstable and capricious mood.
>
> Bob

sheldon's most salient characteristics here are his beliefs that:

* everyone is LYING

* merchants are out to get you (him)

* the 'other' must be denigrated (to sublimate fear).

* everyone is stupider than him.

it must be quite wearying. life is full of jagged edges for the boy.

your pal,
blake

Things just NEVER change around here.



> * everyone is LYING
>
> * *merchants are out to get you (him)
>
> * *the 'other' must be denigrated (to sublimate fear).
>
> * *everyone is stupider than him.