OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks:
Dear Guys, I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing. Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious", just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me). I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else", to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate female's nose out through the back of her skull>. Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm, to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE I'VE NEVER SEEN IT! Turn about is fair play, gentlemen. On behalf of your straight female fan base, Kathleen |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
"Kathleen" > wrote in message ... > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing. > > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious", > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me). > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else", > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate > female's nose out through the back of her skull>. > > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm, > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT! > > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen. > > On behalf of your straight female fan base, > > Kathleen > > > Kathleen, Go cook something. Tom |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Jun 16, 3:30 pm, Kathleen > wrote:
> To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: Did this group change to alt.i.hate.horror.flicks? N. |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Kathleen wrote:
> To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing. > > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious", > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me). > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else", > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate > female's nose out through the back of her skull>. I see a lot of openly ***/bi chicks down on 6th street in Austin on party night (any Friday or Saturday). And most of them are are really hot. They go around grabbing each others tits and snatches and planting wet ones on each other. They get a few drinks in them, they seem to go for either sex. OTOH, the guys stick to just a few bars and I never have to see their antics, thankfully. I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than for a guy to do another guy. *******ism is natural, but man on man is just plain demented. -sw |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Jun 16, 3:30*pm, Kathleen > wrote:
> To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: Why would you want to watch B horror movies anyway? > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. What I wonder is why it always takes them until halfway through the movie to figure out that you have to go for the zombie's head. In Night of the Living Dead I understand, but what is hard to buy into is in subsequent movies I'm supposed to believe that there's a WHOLE town where NO ONE has ever seen Night of the Living Dead. I'm sorry, that's just not plausible. > But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > If you like nice hetero kissing with nice looking guys and gals, this episode of Roswell is chock full: http://www.hulu.com/watch/4563/roswell-sexual-healing The Max-Liz stuff is just beautiful. > > Kathleen --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> On Jun 16, 3:30 pm, Kathleen > wrote: > >>To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > > Why would you want to watch B horror movies anyway? > >>Dear Guys, >> >>I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness >>to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial >>911. > > > What I wonder is why it always takes them until halfway through the > movie to figure out that you have to go for the zombie's head. In > Night of the Living Dead I understand, but what is hard to buy into is > in subsequent movies I'm supposed to believe that there's a WHOLE town > where NO ONE has ever seen Night of the Living Dead. I'm sorry, > that's just not plausible. Well yeah. Like I'd assume the zombie/vampire/psycho freak I just bitch slapped was dead and just TURN MY BACK. Oh hell no. We're talking chainsaws and/or high explosives, followed up with napalm, then me kicking the resulting ashes to the four winds. Call me a "belt and suspenders" kinda gal. OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
In article >,
Kathleen > wrote: > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing. > > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious", > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me). <chuckles> > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else", > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate > female's nose out through the back of her skull>. Happily. > > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm, > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT! > > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen. That might be interesting! > > On behalf of your straight female fan base, > > Kathleen <lol> Well written! :-) And oh so true... -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. Subscribe: |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote: > I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than > for a guy to do another guy. *******ism is natural, but man on man is > just plain demented. > > -sw I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant. -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. Subscribe: |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
In article >,
Kathleen > wrote: > OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday. -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. Subscribe: |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Jun 16, 6:20*pm, Omelet > wrote:
> In article >, > > *Kathleen > wrote: > > OB food: *Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day > > Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I > have in the freezer. *It'll also be his birthday. The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird. > -- > Peace! Om > --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Bryan wrote:
> On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet > wrote: >> In article >, >> >> Kathleen > wrote: >>> OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day >> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I >> have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday. > > The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird. I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric practice. OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-) >> -- >> Peace! Om >> > --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Jun 16, 6:43*pm, dsi1 > wrote:
> Bryan wrote: > > On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet > wrote: > >> In article >, > > >> *Kathleen > wrote: > >>> OB food: *Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day > >> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I > >> have in the freezer. *It'll also be his birthday. > > > The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? *Texas is weird. > > I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm > surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric > practice. What's this "Jew" thing. Om isn't Jewish. > > OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on > it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-) > > > > >> -- > >> Peace! Om > > > --Bryan --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Bryan wrote:
> On Jun 16, 6:43 pm, dsi1 > wrote: >> Bryan wrote: >>> On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet > wrote: >>>> In article >, >>>> Kathleen > wrote: >>>>> OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day >>>> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I >>>> have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday. >>> The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird. >> I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm >> surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric >> practice. > > What's this "Jew" thing. Om isn't Jewish. You misunderstand. I wasn't talking about Om, although she could be Jewish. How would I know? I do know that there are Jews in Texas - well at least one. I'm talking about the practice of eating animals on their birthday - it stinks. Why do you think the Texas ducks includes DOB? So you don't roast them on the wrong date - duh! >> OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on >> it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-) >> >> >> >>>> -- >>>> Peace! Om >>> --Bryan > > --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Jun 16, 7:28*pm, dsi1 > wrote:
> Bryan wrote: > > On Jun 16, 6:43 pm, dsi1 > wrote: > >> Bryan wrote: > >>> On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet > wrote: > >>>> In article >, > >>>> *Kathleen > wrote: > >>>>> OB food: *Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day > >>>> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I > >>>> have in the freezer. *It'll also be his birthday. > >>> The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? *Texas is weird. > >> I find it distasteful to roast and devour someone on their birthday. I'm > >> surprised that the Jew have no restrictions at all on this barbaric > >> practice. > > > What's this "Jew" thing. *Om isn't Jewish. > > You misunderstand. I wasn't talking about Om, although she could be > Jewish. How would I know? I do know that there are Jews in Texas - well > at least one. I'm talking about the practice of eating animals on their > birthday - it stinks. Why do you think the Texas ducks includes DOB? So > you don't roast them on the wrong date - duh! > I'm pretty up to speed on Old Testament dietary laws, and there's nothing in there about not roasting a waterfowl on its birthday. Deuteronomy 14:21 does say: Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk. > > >> OTOH, it would be kind of funny to see a roast wearing a party hat on > >> it's head or neck stump. So festive! :-) > > >>>> -- > >>>> Peace! Om > >>> --Bryan > > > --Bryan --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Bryan wrote:
> I'm pretty up to speed on Old Testament dietary laws, and there's > nothing in there about not roasting a waterfowl on its birthday. > > Deuteronomy 14:21 does say: > Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it > unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou > mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the > LORD thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk. Thanks for citing this. I won't comment on God's OK to sell tainted meat to strangers at the gate. :-) The idea of an animal being cooked in it's mother's milk so horrified the Jews that they separate the pans used for cooking meat from any that may touch milk. This is good policy, I think. My point is that they have no restrictions on cooking an animal on it's birthday - that stinks. For us humans, a birthday means we get free cake. For ducks, it means you could get roasted or made into peeking duck. |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Jun 16, 8:01*pm, dsi1 > wrote:
> Bryan wrote: > > I'm pretty up to speed on Old Testament dietary laws, and there's > > nothing in there about not roasting a waterfowl on its birthday. > > > Deuteronomy 14:21 does say: > > Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it > > unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou > > mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the > > LORD thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk. > > Thanks for citing this. I won't comment on God's OK to sell tainted meat > to strangers at the gate. :-) The idea of an animal being cooked in it's > mother's milk so horrified the Jews that they separate the pans used for > cooking meat from any that may touch milk. This is good policy, I think. > My point is that they have no restrictions on cooking an animal on it's > birthday - that stinks. For us humans, a birthday means we get free > cake. For ducks, it means you could get roasted or made into peeking duck.. I'm not a fan of goat meat, but if it were calf or lamb, thusly prepared, it might be pretty good. If it wasn't appealing, why would they have to forbid it? I mean, you don't see verses like, "Thou shalt not hit thy thumb with a hammer." --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Omelet wrote:
> In article >, > Sqwertz > wrote: > >> I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than >> for a guy to do another guy. *******ism is natural, but man on man is >> just plain demented. >> >> -sw > > I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you > did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant. Om - I think he was trolling :-) |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Bryan wrote:
> On Jun 16, 6:20 pm, Omelet > wrote: >> In article >, >> >> Kathleen > wrote: >>> OB food: Butter almond toffee for my dad for Father's Day >> Big bag of pistachios for mine, and I'm considering roasting that duck I >> have in the freezer. It'll also be his birthday. > > The frozen duck came with a "Born On Date" ??? Texas is weird. >> -- >> Peace! Om >> > --Bryan Maybe it's been a year since she put daffy in the freezer :-) |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Bryan wrote:
> I'm not a fan of goat meat, but if it were calf or lamb, thusly > prepared, it might be pretty good. If it wasn't appealing, why would > they have to forbid it? I mean, you don't see verses like, "Thou > shalt not hit thy thumb with a hammer." > I have it on good authority from a Texas friend (don't know if he's a Jew) that barbecued goat is tasty. Besides the fact that stewing an animal in it's mother's milk is an affront to God, I'd take barbecue over most anything boiled in milk any day of the week - except maybe Wednesday. > --Bryan |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
"Kathleen" > wrote in message ... > To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing. > > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious", > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me). > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else", > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate > female's nose out through the back of her skull>. > > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm, > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT! > > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen. Indeed it is. However a recent study I read found that women's sexuality is more fluid than a male's. Women who identify as heterosexual when exposed to female erotica would sometimes show sexual reactions in the form of arousal. Men in the same study were not at all so inclined and in fact quite the opposite. That was a study I read on MSN. So be that as it may, I know if I was female and being chased by horrible and malevolent spirits that in between bouts of paralyzing and blood curdling useless screams, that a few minutes of spit swapping or even full on sex with another woman would be just the ticket to ease the stress. But that's just me. I just need a place and a haunted house is as good as any. An opportunity delayed is lost. My complaint is they do it early on so you stay tuned to the TV waiting for more. |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Kathleen wrote:
> To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > > First off, a review of Female Sex Drive 101... Surely some of you are > or have been in a relationship with a female? Any recollection of the > effect of stress on the feminine libido? Have you ever come on to a > woman facing a final exam, a performance review, or who is caring for a > sick child? How'd that work out for you? Never mind being chased by > monsters... But we'll set that aside, like the whole "call 911" thing. > > Even assuming that a woman under duress would be comforted by sexual > advances, most of us are straight. Not bisexual or even "bi-curious", > just plain vanilla straight. We like dudes. We would be as likely to > make out with the family pet as with another woman (go ahead, ask my > border collie, Scully, what happens when she tries to french kiss me). > I guarantee the reaction would fall somewhere along the continuum > ranging from "Excuse me, I think you've mistaken me for someone else", > to "WTF!? Are you nuts?", to <brisk attempt to push the importunate > female's nose out through the back of her skull>. > > Yes, I know, the notion makes your winkies waggle. And maybe watching a > cute guy succumb, hesitantly, awkwardly, but with increasing enthusiasm, > to the advances of a male hottie while under ridiculously dangerous > circumstances might be titillating. But I couldn't say for sure 'CAUSE > I'VE NEVER SEEN IT! > > Turn about is fair play, gentlemen. > > On behalf of your straight female fan base, > > Kathleen > > Kathleen - Could you say all that again? Slowly and with great authority? You are making butterflies in my tummy :-) Bob |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
"Omelet" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Sqwertz > wrote: > >> I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than >> for a guy to do another guy. *******ism is natural, but man on man is >> just plain demented. >> >> -sw > > I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you > did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant. This subject is not new. The women I have known have at most expressed a curiosity but none would ever go through with it. Sober anyway. The young girls today must be under intense peer pressure to please and the lesbo stuff seems the way to do it. I wonder how they feel about it later. I've only known one woman who actually did try it or admitted it. For the vast majority they couldn't imagine it and are grossed out by the idea. Paul |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Omelet" > wrote in message > ... >> In article >, >> Sqwertz > wrote: >> >>> I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman >>> than for a guy to do another guy. *******ism is natural, but man >>> on man is just plain demented. >>> >>> -sw >> >> I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you >> did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant. > > This subject is not new. The women I have known have at most > expressed a curiosity but none would ever go through with it. Sober > anyway. The young girls today must be under intense peer pressure to > please and the lesbo stuff seems the way to do it. I wonder how they > feel about it later. > > I've only known one woman who actually did try it or admitted it. > For the vast majority they couldn't imagine it and are grossed out by > the idea. A number of younger gals I've known will go through a "*******" phase when they're younger...they eventually get their act together, get married or whatever, and lead a "normal" life. These are just younger "bi-curious" wimmins, not the hardened bulldyke types... -- Best Greg |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:15:48 -0700 (PDT), Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> On Jun 16, 3:30*pm, Kathleen > wrote: >> To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Why would you want to watch B horror movies anyway? >> >> Dear Guys, >> >> I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness >> to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial >> 911. > > What I wonder is why it always takes them until halfway through the > movie to figure out that you have to go for the zombie's head. In > Night of the Living Dead I understand, but what is hard to buy into is > in subsequent movies I'm supposed to believe that there's a WHOLE town > where NO ONE has ever seen Night of the Living Dead. I'm sorry, > that's just not plausible. > ever hear of 'suspension of disbelief,' bobo? in any case, not everyone is a student of horror movies. blake |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:30:14 -0500, Kathleen wrote:
> To the writers, directors and producers of B horror flicks: > > Dear Guys, > > I do understand that enjoying your movies requires a certain willingness > to accept absurd premises. For example, the apparent inability to dial > 911. But there is a certain vignette that has cropped up with > increasing frequency in recent years that makes it difficult to suspend > disbelief and relax into the experience. I am speaking, specifically, > of the "girl on girl" make-out scene. > i gotta start seeing more horror movies. your pal, blake |
OT - Oh, for Pete's sake...
In article >,
Bob Muncie > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > > In article >, > > Sqwertz > wrote: > > > >> I think it's much easier for a woman to have sex with another woman than > >> for a guy to do another guy. *******ism is natural, but man on man is > >> just plain demented. > >> > >> -sw > > > > I see you don't know women anywhere near as well as you thought you > > did... I personally find the idea to be downright repugnant. > > Om - I think he was trolling :-) Ya think? <g> I was bored... -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. Subscribe: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter