![]() |
most simple of meals and chicken
novice would like to know if there is a 'simple' uncomplicated way to
satisfactorily cook a chicken leg in the microwave please. If its put in a glass bowl should some water be added to the bowl? thanks for advice. |
most simple of meals and chicken
In article >,
"john martin" > wrote: > novice would like to know if there is a 'simple' uncomplicated way to > satisfactorily cook a chicken leg in the microwave please. If its put in a > glass bowl should some water be added to the bowl? thanks for advice. I've never tried what you want to accomplish. If I did it, I'd cook the chicken leg on a microwaveable plate with no water under clear wrap that covered the plate until the wrap balloons from the steam. I don't recommend it, but it's real simple and it uses the microwave. Seasonings would help a little, I think. leo |
most simple of meals and chicken
On Mar 24, 3:19*am, "john martin" > wrote:
> novice would like to know if there is a 'simple' uncomplicated way to > satisfactorily cook a chicken leg in the microwave please. * If its put in a > glass bowl should some water be added to the bowl? * * *thanks for advice. No. It will be awful. --Bryan |
most simple of meals and chicken
On Mar 24, 4:25*am, Leonard Blaisdell >
wrote: > In article >, > *"john martin" > wrote: > > > novice would like to know if there is a 'simple' uncomplicated way to > > satisfactorily cook a chicken leg in the microwave please. * If its put in a > > glass bowl should some water be added to the bowl? * * *thanks for advice. > > I've never tried what you want to accomplish. If I did it, I'd cook the > chicken leg on a microwaveable plate with no water under clear wrap that > covered the plate until the wrap balloons from the steam. I don't > recommend it, but it's real simple and it uses the microwave. Seasonings > would help a little, I think. > > leo I would never use "clear wrap" to touch food cooking in the microwave - I believe it is one of those things that is generally considered "possibly [chemically] bad." I always use waxed paper (probably also bad, but I haven't heard that yet). ;-) I would never cook a chicken leg in the microwave, either. If you can't cook it on a stove top, in an oven, or even in a toaster oven, buy frozen chicken that's already cooked that you can put in the microwave to heat up. N. |
most simple of meals and chicken
In article >,
"john martin" > wrote: > novice would like to know if there is a 'simple' uncomplicated way to > satisfactorily cook a chicken leg in the microwave please. If its put in a > glass bowl should some water be added to the bowl? thanks for advice. Yes, add a bit of liquid and be sure to cover it. I sometimes add BBQ sauce liberally to chicken parts in a covered corningware dish. IMHO, chicken is one meat that is actually very compatible with nuking. As always YMMV. ;-) -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. |
most simple of meals and chicken
Dan Abel wrote:
> I once worked with a woman who lived alone. She bought a microwave. > I asked her what she was going to do with it. She said she got it for > making chicken. It didn't sound good to me, but she said that she > liked it. I don't know what she did exactly, but it was raw chicken, > cooked in the MW. Raw chicken cooking in the microwave smells horrible to me. Maybe it's another one of those cilantro things, but I can't be around it, it's nauseating. nancy |
most simple of meals and chicken
In article
>, Dan Abel > wrote: > In article > >, > Nancy2 > wrote: > > > On Mar 24, 4:25*am, Leonard Blaisdell > > > wrote: > > > > I've never tried what you want to accomplish. If I did it, I'd cook the > > > chicken leg on a microwaveable plate with no water under clear wrap that > > > covered the plate until the wrap balloons from the steam. I don't > > > recommend it, but it's real simple and it uses the microwave. Seasonings > > > would help a little, I think. > > > I would never use "clear wrap" to touch food cooking in the microwave > > - I believe it is one of those things that is generally considered > > "possibly [chemically] bad." I always use waxed paper (probably also > > bad, but I haven't heard that yet). ;-) > > > > I would never cook a chicken leg in the microwave, either. If you > > can't cook it on a stove top, in an oven, or even in a toaster oven, > > buy frozen chicken that's already cooked that you can put in the > > microwave to heat up. > > I once worked with a woman who lived alone. She bought a microwave. I > asked her what she was going to do with it. She said she got it for > making chicken. It didn't sound good to me, but she said that she liked > it. I don't know what she did exactly, but it was raw chicken, cooked > in the MW. Cooked covered in a corningware (or other covered dish with a tight lid), it works. It comes out steamed/poached but imho that works for chicken if you get the meat to liquid ratio right. :-) It's especially good with some sauces. -- Peace! Om Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain. -- Anon. |
most simple of meals and chicken
On Mar 24, 2:13*pm, Dan Abel > wrote:
> In article > >, > > > > > > *Nancy2 > wrote: > > On Mar 24, 4:25*am, Leonard Blaisdell > > > wrote: > > > I've never tried what you want to accomplish. If I did it, I'd cook the > > > chicken leg on a microwaveable plate with no water under clear wrap that > > > covered the plate until the wrap balloons from the steam. I don't > > > recommend it, but it's real simple and it uses the microwave. Seasonings > > > would help a little, I think. > > I would never use "clear wrap" to touch food cooking in the microwave > > - I believe it is one of those things that is generally considered > > "possibly [chemically] bad." *I always use waxed paper (probably also > > bad, but I haven't heard that yet). ;-) > > > I would never cook a chicken leg in the microwave, either. *If you > > can't cook it on a stove top, in an oven, or even in a toaster oven, > > buy frozen chicken that's already cooked that you can put in the > > microwave to heat up. > > I once worked with a woman who lived alone. *She bought a microwave. *I > asked her what she was going to do with it. *She said she got it for > making chicken. *It didn't sound good to me, but she said that she liked > it. *I don't know what she did exactly, but it was raw chicken, cooked > in the MW. Think of all the awful things that folks eat. She must've just had no sense of taste. > > -- > Dan Abel > Petaluma, California USA > --Bryan |
most simple of meals and chicken
Bobo Bonobo® wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2:13 pm, Dan Abel > wrote: > >>In article >, >> >> >> >> >> >> Nancy2 > wrote: >> >>>On Mar 24, 4:25 am, Leonard Blaisdell > >>>wrote: >>> >>>>I've never tried what you want to accomplish. If I did it, I'd cook the >>>>chicken leg on a microwaveable plate with no water under clear wrap that >>>>covered the plate until the wrap balloons from the steam. I don't >>>>recommend it, but it's real simple and it uses the microwave. Seasonings >>>>would help a little, I think. >>> >>>I would never use "clear wrap" to touch food cooking in the microwave >>>- I believe it is one of those things that is generally considered >>>"possibly [chemically] bad." I always use waxed paper (probably also >>>bad, but I haven't heard that yet). ;-) >> >>>I would never cook a chicken leg in the microwave, either. If you >>>can't cook it on a stove top, in an oven, or even in a toaster oven, >>>buy frozen chicken that's already cooked that you can put in the >>>microwave to heat up. >> >>I once worked with a woman who lived alone. She bought a microwave. I >>asked her what she was going to do with it. She said she got it for >>making chicken. It didn't sound good to me, but she said that she liked >>it. I don't know what she did exactly, but it was raw chicken, cooked >>in the MW. > > > Think of all the awful things that folks eat. > She must've just had no sense of taste. My dad said once that he wished that there were something along the lines of Purina Bachelor Chow, that he could just serve himself up a scoop of some sort of nutritionally complete kibble to munch in front of the tv on those nights when there was nobody else around to fix him something. In my opionion, microwaved chicken falls into the same category. I suspect, though, that a prolonged diet of this sort of thing probably leads to public armpit scratching and poop slinging. |
most simple of meals and chicken
On Mar 24, 10:44*pm, Kathleen > wrote:
> Bobo Bonobo® wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2:13 pm, Dan Abel > wrote: > > >>In article > >, > > >> Nancy2 > wrote: > > >>>On Mar 24, 4:25 am, Leonard Blaisdell > > >>>wrote: > > >>>>I've never tried what you want to accomplish. If I did it, I'd cook the > >>>>chicken leg on a microwaveable plate with no water under clear wrap that > >>>>covered the plate until the wrap balloons from the steam. I don't > >>>>recommend it, but it's real simple and it uses the microwave. Seasonings > >>>>would help a little, I think. > > >>>I would never use "clear wrap" to touch food cooking in the microwave > >>>- I believe it is one of those things that is generally considered > >>>"possibly [chemically] bad." *I always use waxed paper (probably also > >>>bad, but I haven't heard that yet). ;-) > > >>>I would never cook a chicken leg in the microwave, either. *If you > >>>can't cook it on a stove top, in an oven, or even in a toaster oven, > >>>buy frozen chicken that's already cooked that you can put in the > >>>microwave to heat up. > > >>I once worked with a woman who lived alone. *She bought a microwave. *I > >>asked her what she was going to do with it. *She said she got it for > >>making chicken. *It didn't sound good to me, but she said that she liked > >>it. *I don't know what she did exactly, but it was raw chicken, cooked > >>in the MW. > > > Think of all the awful things that folks eat. > > She must've just had no sense of taste. > > My dad said once that he wished that there were something along the > lines of Purina Bachelor Chow, that he could just serve himself up a > scoop of some sort of nutritionally complete kibble to munch in front of > the tv on those nights when there was nobody else around to fix him > something. > > In my opionion, microwaved chicken falls into the same category. I agree. That's all the way to one side of a continuum. > > I suspect, though, that a prolonged diet of this sort of thing probably > leads to public armpit scratching and poop slinging There are women who are like that to though. The very nice woman at my work who really doesn't care much about the taste of food. I showed her this awful recipe I'd found the other day, and she said that she could probably pretty happily eat it. --Bryan |
most simple of meals and chicken
Pull the skin off of the chicken leg, salt & pepper, a little bbq sauce
or Italian salad dressing, cover plate with a paper towel. If you leave the skin on, it'll be gross. Denise |
most simple of meals and chicken
john martin > wrote:
> novice would like to know if there is a 'simple' uncomplicated way to > satisfactorily cook a chicken leg in the microwave please. If its put in a > glass bowl should some water be added to the bowl? thanks for advice. Honestly, I've never tried this, but I would highly reccommned against adding any water. I have cooked chicken legs by steaming and the result is pretty blah. I think I would also just put it in a shallow microwave safe disk with a paper towel cover to prevent splatter. A tight glass lid would get you back to steaming. No guarantees here, but that's my best guess as to how to make this worthwhile. Now, here is what I would try. Lightly cover the whole thing with some dry seasoning. I'd probably try lemon pepper first, but maybe a barbecue rub. Add a little dusting of paprika. Don't overcook! If this is a whole leg (thigh and drumstick) you should get an instant read thermometer and check the temperature. Try 1 minute, check for temperature/doneness, add another minute or 30 seconds as seems needed. 165 F in the middle of the thigh meat (not touching the bone) should be about right. It is kind of tough to get a good reading on just a drumstick. After you've done this once or twice you should get a feel for the time needed in your particular microwave, and if you like the results enough to keep doing it. Good luck. Bill Ranck Blacskburg, Va. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter