Dave > wrote:

> According to a new research report, there are two types of meat
> consumption that are getting us into health-related trouble: red meat
> and processed meat. Those who eat more of these appear to have a
> modestly increased risk of death from all causes and also from cancer
> or heart disease over a 10-year period.

Until they start growing humans from strictly controlled, cloned
seed stock and raising them under tightly controlled conditions,
none of these "research reports" will be worth much.

In the meantime, **** off and take your damned blog with you.

-sw

On Mar 23, 2:18*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> Dave > wrote:
> > According to a new research report, there are two types of meat
> > consumption that are getting us into health-related trouble: red meat
> > and processed meat. Those who eat more of these appear to have a
> > modestly increased risk of death from all causes and also from cancer
> > or heart disease over a 10-year period.
>
> Until they start growing humans from strictly controlled, cloned
> seed stock and raising them under tightly controlled conditions,
> none of these "research reports" will be worth much.
>
> In the meantime, **** off and take your damned blog with you.
>
> -sw

Hey SW . . . Much of today's gastronomic society is geared towards
eating healthier. If you don't want to, that's your choice.

I just picked up a copy of a Woman's Day cookbook that my wife has had
for 30 or more years, and some of the incredible things they tell you
to do in there are just shocking by today's standards. Dump in lard
for this recipe, a cup of butter for this recipe, etc. Amazing what
time has done to our sensitivity about healthy eating.

D.

Dave > wrote:

> On Mar 23, 2:18*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>> Until they start growing humans from strictly controlled, cloned
>> seed stock and raising them under tightly controlled conditions,
>> none of these "research reports" will be worth much.
>>
>> In the meantime, **** off and take your damned blog with you.
>
> Hey SW . . . Much of today's gastronomic society is geared towards
> eating healthier. If you don't want to, that's your choice.
> ...
> Amazing what time has done to our sensitivity about healthy eating.

Yeah - and it's amazing what a few hundred thousand people
advertising their blogs on Usenet groups can do liven up the groups.
I mean, heck, you don't have financial interest in any of this,
right?

-sw

On Mar 23, 5:44*pm, Dave > wrote:

> Hey SW . . . Much of today's gastronomic society is geared towards
> eating healthier. If you don't want to, that's your choice.
>
> I just picked up a copy of a Woman's Day cookbook that my wife has had
> for 30 or more years, and some of the incredible things they tell you
> to do in there are just shocking by today's standards. Dump in lard
> for this recipe, a cup of butter for this recipe, etc. Amazing what
> time has done to our sensitivity about healthy eating.
>
> D.

Nothing wrong with a cup of butter. Just don't do it every day.
By the way, how many servings was that? A cup of butter for
8 servings is only a couple of tablespoons per serving. If it
was a dessert, you might get 16 servings out of it.

Cindy Hamilton