![]() |
Eat One Truffle And We Got You !!!
Quoing from:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12...you_want_macs/ The two salesman-academics ran a study which involved giving one group of people a chocolate truffle, and asking another group to be strong and abstain. It appears that scoffing just one fancy choc, according to the profs, tends to unleash a "what the hell" syndrome. The truffle- gobblers then feel a strong desire for more treats - for instance ice cream, pizza, and potato chips - while the puritanical group found it easy to spurn any further delicious but possibly nutritionally unwise offerings. If that was all, frankly we wouldn't have bothered you. But it's not. "A second study again had people eat or resist a chocolate truffle and asked them to indicate how much they desired several products that are symbols of status [for example] an Apple computer... People who ate the truffle desired the status products significantly more than those who had to resist the truffle," write Laran and Janiszewski. |
Eat One Truffle And We Got You !!!
Mark Thorson said...
> Quoing from: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12...you_want_macs/ > > The two salesman-academics ran a study which > involved giving one group of people a chocolate > truffle, and asking another group to be strong > and abstain. It appears that scoffing just one > fancy choc, according to the profs, tends to > unleash a "what the hell" syndrome. The truffle- > gobblers then feel a strong desire for more > treats - for instance ice cream, pizza, and > potato chips - while the puritanical group found > it easy to spurn any further delicious but > possibly nutritionally unwise offerings. > > If that was all, frankly we wouldn't have > bothered you. But it's not. > > "A second study again had people eat or resist > a chocolate truffle and asked them to indicate > how much they desired several products that are > symbols of status [for example] an Apple > computer... People who ate the truffle desired > the status products significantly more than > those who had to resist the truffle," write > Laran and Janiszewski. Cheapskate study!!! Should've used real summer or winter truffles. The BUMS!!! Imho, Andy |
Eat One Truffle And We Got You !!!
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:17:38 +0000 (UTC), Andy > wrote:
>Mark Thorson said... > >> Quoing from: >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12...you_want_macs/ >> >> The two salesman-academics ran a study which >> involved giving one group of people a chocolate >> truffle, and asking another group to be strong >> and abstain. It appears that scoffing just one >> fancy choc, according to the profs, tends to >> unleash a "what the hell" syndrome. The truffle- >> gobblers then feel a strong desire for more >> treats - for instance ice cream, pizza, and >> potato chips - while the puritanical group found >> it easy to spurn any further delicious but >> possibly nutritionally unwise offerings. >> >> If that was all, frankly we wouldn't have >> bothered you. But it's not. >> >> "A second study again had people eat or resist >> a chocolate truffle and asked them to indicate >> how much they desired several products that are >> symbols of status [for example] an Apple >> computer... People who ate the truffle desired >> the status products significantly more than >> those who had to resist the truffle," write >> Laran and Janiszewski. > > >Cheapskate study!!! > >Should've used real summer or winter truffles. > >The BUMS!!! > >Imho, You know any study can be skewed... but the food study would fit my family pretty well. FYI: I think it's unprofessional to call someone who can resist chocolate truffles "puritanical". No real study would do that. ;) -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
Eat One Truffle And We Got You !!!
sf wrote
> You know any study can be skewed... but the food study would fit my > family pretty well. FYI: I think it's unprofessional to call someone > who can resist chocolate truffles "puritanical". No real study would > do that. > > ;) Or one could guess what kind of truffles they were using ;) -- Vilco Think pink, drink rose' |
Eat One Truffle And We Got You !!!
sf wrote:
> > You know any study can be skewed... but the food study would fit my > family pretty well. FYI: I think it's unprofessional to call someone > who can resist chocolate truffles "puritanical". No real study would > do that. I forwarded this comment to the authors, and they reply: Certainly, anyone (chomp!) is entitled to their (slurp! chomp!) opinions (smack!). We stand by our (munch!) data, (yum!) analysis, and (smack!) conclusions. (hey! save one of those for me!) |
Eat One Truffle And We Got You !!!
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:43:39 -0800, Mark Thorson >
wrote: >sf wrote: >> >> You know any study can be skewed... but the food study would fit my >> family pretty well. FYI: I think it's unprofessional to call someone >> who can resist chocolate truffles "puritanical". No real study would >> do that. > >I forwarded this comment to the authors, and >they reply: > >Certainly, anyone (chomp!) is entitled to their >(slurp! chomp!) opinions (smack!). We stand by >our (munch!) data, (yum!) analysis, and (smack!) >conclusions. (hey! save one of those for me!) Heh. -- I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond. Mae West |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter