Oh...... MY....... GOD!

You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.

I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
****ing lame you are.

And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. He
really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. This is why we killed him
in the first place. As you can see, he took it kinda hard. Talk
about a mental melt-down...

-sw

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> This last couple days I get several email's from people who very nicely
> asked to be removed from my kill-file. I think it's been long enough that
> most of you have learned your lesson.
>
> HERE'S THE DWEAL: There are currently 13 people in my kill-file. I will
> copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for ONE
> WEEK.
>
> Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed permanently
> from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me for calling
> me dead.
>
> Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> WARNING: DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT rather that
> I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. If you say that I was dead, you will
> not be removed from my kill-file. Anyone who does not right a apology and
> post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the kill-file at the
> end of the week. Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>
> TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it before...
> we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. They WILL need
> to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>
> Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... it is
> strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>
> WARNING!!!!! If you take back your apology at any point in the future or
> say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately re-kill-filed.
>
> I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you to say
> that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like ME, or that any
> of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking you to
> apologize for the damge you done to me personally. Example, I am NOT
> telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to be unkillfiled,
> but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later time.
>
> Jerry

SO I TAKE IT THAT'S A "NO" FOR YOU STEVE???!?!!

And I thought you told me NOT TO TOP-POST OR CROSS-POST!!! fOLLOW YOUR OWN
RULE'S!!!

Have another Taco,

JERRY


"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>
> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>
> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> ****ing lame you are.
>
> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. He
> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. This is why we killed him
> in the first place. As you can see, he took it kinda hard. Talk
> about a mental melt-down...
>
> -sw
>
> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
>
> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very nicely
> > asked to be removed from my kill-file. I think it's been long enough
that
> > most of you have learned your lesson.
> >
> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: There are currently 13 people in my kill-file. I
will
> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for ONE
> > WEEK.
> >
> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
permanently
> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me for
calling
> > me dead.
> >
> > Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> > WARNING: DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT rather
that
> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. If you say that I was dead, you
will
> > not be removed from my kill-file. Anyone who does not right a apology
and
> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the kill-file at
the
> > end of the week. Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
> >
> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
before...
> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. They WILL
need
> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
> >
> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... it is
> > strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
> >
> > WARNING!!!!! If you take back your apology at any point in the future
or
> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately re-kill-filed.
> >
> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you to say
> > that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like ME, or that
any
> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking you to
> > apologize for the damge you done to me personally. Example, I am NOT
> > telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to be
unkillfiled,
> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later time.
> >
> > Jerry

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> SO I TAKE IT THAT'S A "NO" FOR YOU STEVE???!?!!

Ahh, but I have a free, weekly pass. Who knows - maybe I'll write
you a 200-word apology next Sunday at 12:00pm. I still have 82
hours to think about it, right? That is, if you keep your word.

Can I write 400 words? I've never seen you read a 200-word post
without complaining that you didn't have time to read it all.

> And I thought you told me NOT TO TOP-POST OR CROSS-POST!!! fOLLOW YOUR OWN
> RULE'S!!!

Again - you imagined that. I never told you that, liar. I expect a
200-word apology for that comment.

[Oops - I mispelled kibology on my first crosspost - no big loss I
guess]

-sw

On Oct 19, 12:21 pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
> > SO I TAKE IT THAT'S A "NO" FOR YOU STEVE???!?!!
>
> Ahh, but I have a free, weekly pass. Who knows - maybe I'll write
> you a 200-word apology next Sunday at 12:00pm. I still have 82
> hours to think about it, right? That is, if you keep your word.
>
> Can I write 400 words? I've never seen you read a 200-word post
> without complaining that you didn't have time to read it all.
>
> > And I thought you told me NOT TO TOP-POST OR CROSS-POST!!! fOLLOW YOUR OWN
> > RULE'S!!!
>
> Again - you imagined that. I never told you that, liar. I expect a
> 200-word apology for that comment.
>
> [Oops - I mispelled kibology on my first crosspost - no big loss I
> guess]

It's all right, rememeber (one of) the first rule(s) of kibology;
You're Allowed. We donut mind, especially if we donut know about it.


Dr. Hot"who are you, again?"Salt

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
>
> > SO I TAKE IT THAT'S A "NO" FOR YOU STEVE???!?!!
>
> Ahh, but I have a free, weekly pass. Who knows - maybe I'll write
> you a 200-word apology next Sunday at 12:00pm. I still have 82
> hours to think about it, right? That is, if you keep your word.

WRONG. You have until I wake up on Saturday, October 25. That's the
dead-line. And oh, by the way my WORD was that I can do whatever I want, so
technically I can kill-file you RIGHT NOW if I wanted and still keep my
word. Didn't you read the Warning's?

>Can I write 400 words?

No. I don't have time for that.

> Again - you imagined that. I never told you that, liar.

Yes you did. You must have been drunk.

On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:40:26 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jerry Sauk > wrote:
>>
>>> SO I TAKE IT THAT'S A "NO" FOR YOU STEVE???!?!!
>>
>> Ahh, but I have a free, weekly pass. Who knows - maybe I'll write
>> you a 200-word apology next Sunday at 12:00pm. I still have 82
>> hours to think about it, right? That is, if you keep your word.
>
> WRONG. You have until I wake up on Saturday, October 25. That's the
> dead-line. And oh, by the way my WORD was that I can do whatever I want, so
> technically I can kill-file you RIGHT NOW if I wanted and still keep my
> word. Didn't you read the Warning's?
>

i think you should travel in time back to last week and killfile him then.
that's what happens to people who don't read Warning's!

blake

Jerry Sauk wrote:

> Didn't you read the Warning's?

You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??

>> Can I write 400 words?
>
> No. I don't have time for that.

So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.

-sw

"Sqwertz"
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> Didn't you read the Warning's?
>
> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??
>
>>> Can I write 400 words?
>>
>> No. I don't have time for that.
>
> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>
> -sw

Guys, this is beginning to seem like when brats tie sharp objects to stray
animals. It is not pretty.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > Didn't you read the Warning's?
>
> You mena the one that said From: Jerry Sauk > ??
>
> >> Can I write 400 words?
> >
> > No. I don't have time for that.
>
> So, what if - by some act of Satan - would you do if *two* people mailed
> you their 200-word apologies? That would be 400 words.
>
> -sw

I have plenty of time for that, if it's from two different people. THAT'S
why I made the 200-word limit in the first place.

I see your still just as big of an idiot as you were before.

I'm sure TFM will be writing the 200 word apology. To be sure he is
sincere, I think it should be posted here also.


>
>> This last couple days I get several email's from people who very nicely
>> asked to be removed from my kill-file. I think it's been long enough
>> that
>> most of you have learned your lesson.
>>
>> HERE'S THE DWEAL: There are currently 13 people in my kill-file. I will
>> copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for ONE
>> WEEK.
>>
>> Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>> permanently
>> from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me for
>> calling
>> me dead.

>>
>> TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>> before...
>> we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. They WILL
>> need
>> to write an apology tostay out of it though.
> Jerry

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> I'm sure TFM will be writing the 200 word apology. To be sure he is
> sincere, I think it should be posted here also.
>
>
>>
>>> This last couple days I get several email's from people who very nicely
>>> asked to be removed from my kill-file. I think it's been long enough
>>> that
>>> most of you have learned your lesson.
>>>
>>> HERE'S THE DWEAL: There are currently 13 people in my kill-file. I
>>> will
>>> copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for ONE
>>> WEEK.
>>>
>>> Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>>> permanently
>>> from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me for
>>> calling
>>> me dead.
>
>>>
>>> TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>>> before...
>>> we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. They WILL
>>> need
>>> to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>> Jerry
>
>

I think all of you aging boys need to ****ing grow up.

cybercat > wrote:

> I think all of you aging boys need to ****ing grow up.

Oh, please - get off your high horse. It's not like you haven't had
a handful or three of OT hissy fits here.

At least this one is entertaining.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> I think all of you aging boys need to ****ing grow up.
>
> Oh, please - get off your high horse. It's not like you haven't had
> a handful or three of OT hissy fits here.
>
> At least this one is entertaining.
>

Who said I was talking about Jerry? I'm talking about you and Edwin
crossposting this shit.

cybercat > wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> I think all of you aging boys need to ****ing grow up.
>>
>> Oh, please - get off your high horse. It's not like you haven't had
>> a handful or three of OT hissy fits here.
>>
>> At least this one is entertaining.
>
> Who said I was talking about Jerry? I'm talking about you and Edwin
> crossposting this shit.

Yeah - so? I know who you were referring to (mostly ME).
And I was talking about you, not Jerry or Ed.

-sw

"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> I think all of you aging boys need to ****ing grow up.
>>
>> Oh, please - get off your high horse. It's not like you haven't had
>> a handful or three of OT hissy fits here.
>>
>> At least this one is entertaining.
>>
>
> Who said I was talking about Jerry? I'm talking about you and Edwin
> crossposting this shit.
>

I didn't crosspost anything. It was sent to one group only.

Childish? Maybe, but I thought is was worth a chuckle.

In article >,
"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote:


I'm not going to right<sic> a<sic> apology to Jerry. In fact, I thought
I had killfile alt.food.fast-food. But I couldn't find the entry, so I
added one, for an extra long time.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>
> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>
> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> ****ing lame you are.
>
> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. �He
> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. �This is why we killed him
> in the first place. �As you can see, he took it kinda hard. �Talk
> about a mental melt-down...
>
>
>
>
> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very nicely
> > asked to be removed from my kill-file. �I think it's been long enough that
> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>
> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: �There are currently 13 people in my kill-file. �I will
> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for ONE
> > WEEK.
>
> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed permanently
> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me for calling
> > me dead.
>
> > �Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.

"Sheldon" > wrote in message
...
Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>
> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>
> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> ****ing lame you are.
>
> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
> about a mental melt-down...
>
>
>
>
> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very nicely
> > asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been long enough
that
> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>
> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file. ?I
will
> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for ONE
> > WEEK.
>
> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
permanently
> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me for
calling
> > me dead.
>
> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT rather
that
> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was dead, you
will
> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a apology
and
> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the kill-file at
the
> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>
> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
before...
> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They WILL
need
> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>
> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it is
> > strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>
> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the future
or
> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately re-kill-filed.
>
> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you to say
> > that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like ME, or that
any
> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking you to
> > apologize for the damge you done to me personally. ?Example, I am NOT
> > telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to be
unkillfiled,
> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later time.
>
> > Jerry- http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk


>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
>experiencing your stench.

You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If you
don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.

Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
> works.

Jerry never really died. He's been in a coma for 8 months and is
posting VIA mental telepathy.

-sw

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.247...
> Sqwertz > news:gdl1l9$70r$2
> @registered.motzarella.org: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>>
>>> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
>>> works.
>>
>> Jerry never really died. He's been in a coma for 8 months and is
>> posting VIA mental telepathy.
>
> Mea culpa! I thought he was communicating via seance.
>
> Michael


He wasn't in a comma, he was in an apostrophe!

TFM®

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote:

> Sqwertz > news:gdl1l9$70r$2
> @registered.motzarella.org: in rec.food.cooking
>
>> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>>
>>> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
>>> works.
>>
>> Jerry never really died. He's been in a coma for 8 months and is
>> posting VIA mental telepathy.
>
> Mea culpa! I thought he was communicating via seance.

That's exactly what we're doing here - trying to revive him. If it
weren't for us, the light would have faded months ago.

-sw

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.250...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >
> > "Sheldon" > wrote in message
> > ..
> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
> >>
> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
> >>
> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> >> ****ing lame you are.
> >>
> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
> >> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
> >> about a mental melt-down...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
> >> > long enough
> > that
> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
> >>
> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file.
> >> > ?I
> > will
> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for
> >> > ONE WEEK.
> >>
> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
> > permanently
> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
> >> > for
> > calling
> >> > me dead.
> >>
> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> >> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT
> >> > rather
> > that
> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was dead,
> >> > you
> > will
> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
> >> > apology
> > and
> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
> >> > kill-file at
> > the
> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
> >>
> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
> > before...
> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
> >> > WILL
> > need
> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
> >>
> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it
> >> > is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
> >>
> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
> >> > future
> > or
> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
> >> > re-kill-filed.
> >>
> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you
> >> > to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like
> >> > ME, or that
> > any
> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally. ?Example,
> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to
> >> > be
> > unkillfiled,
> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later
> >> > time.
> >>
> >> > Jerry- http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk
> >
> >
> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
> >>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
> >>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
> >>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
> >>experiencing your stench.
> >
> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If
> > you
> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>
> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
> works.
>
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Find me at: - michael at lonergan dot us dot com

NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
stay on-topic.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:32:32 -0500, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
> "Michael 'Dog3'" wrote...
>> "Jerry Sauk": in rec.food.cooking
>> > "Sheldon" wrote...
>> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>> >>
>> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>> >>
>> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
>> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
>> >> ****ing lame you are.
>> >>
>> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
>> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
>> >> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
>> >> about a mental melt-down...
>> >>
>> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
>> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
>> >> > long enough
>> > that
>> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>> >>
>> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file.
>> >> > ?I
>> > will
>> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file for
>> >> > ONE WEEK.
>> >>
>> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>> > permanently
>> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
>> >> > for
>> > calling
>> >> > me dead.
>> >>
>> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
>> >> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT
>> >> > rather
>> > that
>> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was dead,
>> >> > you
>> > will
>> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
>> >> > apology
>> > and
>> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
>> >> > kill-file at
>> > the
>> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>> > before...
>> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
>> >> > WILL
>> > need
>> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>> >>
>> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it
>> >> > is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>> >>
>> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
>> >> > future
>> > or
>> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
>> >> > re-kill-filed.
>> >>
>> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you
>> >> > to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like
>> >> > ME, or that
>> > any
>> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
>> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally. ?Example,
>> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to
>> >> > be
>> > unkillfiled,
>> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later
>> >> > time.
>> >
>> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
>> >>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
>> >>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
>> >>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
>> >>experiencing your stench.
>> >
>> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If
>> > you
>> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>>
>> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
>> works.
>
> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
> stay on-topic.

ROFLMAO!!! Or else you'll freak out and threaten "everyone else" with
being repr0ted to their ISP for off-topic poasting?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
Superfaggot; Wingnut's #1 World Class Coward (next to the French)
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel
A message to Tory scum: The environment is still more important than the
economy. The stock market goes up and down, and only fools think they
can control it.

"Canada is going to hades quickly with the Fag laws and the drug
problem." -- A self-professed "former kookologist" (around at the very
beginning, in fact) has an interesting definition of "quickly".
Message-ID: >

"A dog in the video I watched ****ed a human woman. The dog consented to
it and the woman consented to it. That is like one *** man consenting to
having sex with another. Do you approve of it?" -- Agamemnon watches
bestiality porn and compares it to *** sex. Message-ID:
>
http://www.kookpedia.net/index.php/Agamemnon

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
>

"F!ck moderation, free speech is a masculinist proverb and that's what
feminist manvagina's like yourself." -- posted
before finishing a thought, in MID:
. com>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: >

"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: >

"The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt"
sta.org> wrote in message
news ..
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:32:32 -0500, Jerry Sauk did most oddly state:
> > "Michael 'Dog3'" wrote...
> >> "Jerry Sauk": in rec.food.cooking
> >> > "Sheldon" wrote...
> >> > . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
> >> >>
> >> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
> >> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see how
> >> >> ****ing lame you are.
> >> >>
> >> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
> >> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed him
> >> >> in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard. ?Talk
> >> >> about a mental melt-down...
> >> >>
> >> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
> >> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
> >> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
> >> >> > long enough
> >> > that
> >> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
> >> >>
> >> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my kill-file.
> >> >> > ?I
> >> > will
> >> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file
for
> >> >> > ONE WEEK.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
> >> > permanently
> >> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
> >> >> > for
> >> > calling
> >> >> > me dead.
> >> >>
> >> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it again.
> >> >> > WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to life, BUT
> >> >> > rather
> >> > that
> >> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was
dead,
> >> >> > you
> >> > will
> >> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
> >> >> > apology
> >> > and
> >> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
> >> >> > kill-file at
> >> > the
> >> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
> >> >>
> >> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
> >> > before...
> >> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
> >> >> > WILL
> >> > need
> >> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed... ?it
> >> >> > is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
> >> >>
> >> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
> >> >> > future
> >> > or
> >> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
> >> >> > re-kill-filed.
> >> >>
> >> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking you
> >> >> > to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you like
> >> >> > ME, or that
> >> > any
> >> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
> >> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally.
?Example,
> >> >> > I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public Property, to
> >> >> > be
> >> > unkillfiled,
> >> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a later
> >> >> > time.
> >> >
> >> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly brain
> >> >>dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed through the
> >> >>nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad she neglected
> >> >>to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not interested in
> >> >>experiencing your stench.
> >> >
> >> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are. If
> >> > you
> >> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
> >>
> >> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way it
> >> works.
> >
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
else
> > stay on-topic.
>
> ROFLMAO!!! Or else you'll freak out and threaten "everyone else" with
> being repr0ted to their ISP for off-topic poasting?

That's one possibility. Otherwise I could just killfile them.

Jerry Sauk wrote:

>
> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
> stay on-topic.
>
>

There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!

-dk

DK > writes:

[to Jerry]

> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however
> you can dictate NOTHING!


ObTim: "Say, Cloesha, how mah dictate?"



Geoff

--
"If you take a Republican and shoot out major portions
of his brains, I guess it's not too surprising you might
end up with a Democrat." -- Rusty Sanders on James Brady

"DK" > wrote in message
...
> Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> >
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
else
> > stay on-topic.
> >
> >
>
> There is no doubt you are the "biggest", however you can dictate NOTHING!
>
> -dk

Ever hear of a little thing called Netiquette? I hjave a right to demand
that it be followed.

Jerry Sauk > wrote:

> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster

Well, you got that part right. You weighs 320lbs.

But your off-topic posts outweigh your on-topic posts by 30 to 1.
Now please **** off and die. Again.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...

> Now please **** off and die. Again.
>
> -sw

Anybody who knows anything about usenet steve is that it's FOAD. by typing
out all the words you waste bandwidth.

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
...
>

> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone else
> stay on-topic.
>
>

Could you elaborate on biggest?

With $15.00 meals at taco bell how could you not be the biggest!!

Robert

"Robert" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jerry Sauk" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
>
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the biggest
> > on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that everyone
else
> > stay on-topic.
> >
> >
>
> Could you elaborate on biggest?
>
> With $15.00 meals at taco bell how could you not be the biggest!!
>
> Robert

That was exactly my point. By eating the most fast-food, I know the most
about it, and tehrefore am the best on-topic poster on the group.

"Jerry Sauk" > wrote in
:

>
> "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
> 5.250...
>> "Jerry Sauk" >
>> : in
>> rec.food.cooking
>>
>> >
>> > "Sheldon" > wrote in message
>> >
>> > m.. . Sqwertz AKA Jerry Sauk wrote:
>> >> Oh...... MY....... GOD!
>> >>
>> >> You are so ****ing pathetic it's un-****ing-believable.
>> >>
>> >> I'll leave the rest of this in tact for others to read while I
>> >> crosspost the shit out of this for the rest of the world to see
>> >> how ****ing lame you are.
>> >>
>> >> And those us following his kook-posts know he's not a troll. ?He
>> >> really IS a genuine USDA Grade AA moron. ?This is why we killed
>> >> him in the first place. ?As you can see, he took it kinda hard.
>> >> ?Talk about a mental melt-down...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jerry Sauk AKA Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> > This last couple days I get several email's from people who very
>> >> > nicely asked to be removed from my kill-file. ?I think it's been
>> >> > long enough
>> > that
>> >> > most of you have learned your lesson.
>> >>
>> >> > HERE'S THE DWEAL: ?There are currently 13 people in my
>> >> > kill-file. ?I
>> > will
>> >> > copy the name's to a separate file, and eliminate the kill-file
>> >> > for ONE WEEK.
>> >>
>> >> > Some time during the week. those of you who want to be removed
>> > permanently
>> >> > from the file will be expected to write a 200 word apology to me
>> >> > for
>> > calling
>> >> > me dead.
>> >>
>> >> > ?Explaining what you have learned and that you won't do it
>> >> > again. WARNING: ?DO NOT say that I WAS dead but came back to
>> >> > life, BUT rather
>> > that
>> >> > I was NEVER dead and it was all a lie. ?If you say that I was
>> >> > dead, you
>> > will
>> >> > not be removed from my kill-file. ?Anyone who does not right a
>> >> > apology
>> > and
>> >> > post it on the group in this thread will be put back in the
>> >> > kill-file at
>> > the
>> >> > end of the week. ?Apology's 199 words or less will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> > TFM and Paco may or may not be unkillfiled since they were in it
>> > before...
>> >> > we'll see how they behave and then I will make a decision. ?They
>> >> > WILL
>> > need
>> >> > to write an apology tostay out of it though.
>> >>
>> >> > Writing the apology does NOT gaurentee you will be removed...
>> >> > ?it is strictly by my own choice who gets removed.
>> >>
>> >> > WARNING!!!!! ?If you take back your apology at any point in the
>> >> > future
>> > or
>> >> > say that I died EVEN JUST ONCE, you will be immediately
>> >> > re-kill-filed.
>> >>
>> >> > I think I am being EXTREMELY fair about this, I am NOT asking
>> >> > you to say that you like the taste of fast-food or even that you
>> >> > like ME, or that
>> > any
>> >> > of my past arguement's you now agree with, all I doing is asking
>> >> > you to apologize for the damge you done to me personally.
>> >> > ?Example, I am NOT telling you to say that Taco Blell is Public
>> >> > Property, to be
>> > unkillfiled,
>> >> > but if the discussion wasn't closed we could discuss it at a
>> >> > later time.
>> >>
>> >> > Jerry- http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk
>> >
>> >
>> >>You are definitely dead... with how you write you are certainly
>> >>brain dead, and that is dead. It's obvious you were birthed
>> >>through the nether end of your momma's alimentary canal... too bad
>> >>she neglected to flush... please leave me in your killfile, I'm not
>> >>interested in experiencing your stench.
>> >
>> > You never were in my killfile. I don't even know who you are.
>> > If you
>> > don't want to read my post's, then stay out of alt.fast-food.
>>
>> So you died and now think you own alt.fast-food? That's not the way
>> it works.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> --
>> Find me at: - michael at lonergan dot us dot com
>
> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> everyone else stay on-topic.

Yo, Jerry. Do I need a hall pass to post in alt.fast-food? Do I need
references? Do you think it is matters if you object?

It was real solid of you to share your ****headedness with AUK. We usually
have to drag shitheads in so we can poke them, and here you are offering
yourself up like a sacrificial lamb.

Anyone have any mint sauce?

--
Black Metal ist Krieg

On Oct 23, 8:38�am, "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote:
> "Jerry Sauk" :in rec.food.cooking
>
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. � but for year's I have been the
> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> > everyone else stay on-topic.
>
> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about something
> they would like to talk about... Is that it? �Besides, you have no rights
> on Usenet. �None. None of us do.
>
> Michael

Wait-a-min-it... sulking Sauk has earned the right to wear a tin foil
prolapsed asshole beanie: http://tinyurl.com/4n3sbk

"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote in
.250:

> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in
> rec.food.cooking
>
>
>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>> biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
>> everyone else stay on-topic.
>
> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>
> Michael

Hey, long time no see!

Jerry looks like he'll fit in fine in AUK, if he doesn't mind being the
main course.



--
Black Metal ist Krieg

"spooge" > wrote in message
...
> "Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote in
> .250:

>> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
>> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
>> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
>> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>>
>> Michael
>
> Hey, long time no see!
>

Long time no see from here, too. lol

Cheryl, who had to remove some froups to get this to go through. Damn
censorship.


> Jerry looks like he'll fit in fine in AUK, if he doesn't mind being the
> main course.
>

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
.250...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>
> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> > everyone else stay on-topic.
>
> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like to
> complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about something
> they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you have no rights
> on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>
> Michael

WRONG. America is full of rights... ever hear of a little thing called
the constitution? Free speech? I have the RIGHT on Usenet, alt-fast.food
specifically, to say how great fast-food is.

Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>> "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
>> .250...
>>> "Jerry Sauk" >
>>> : in
>>> rec.food.cooking
>>>
>>>
>>>> NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
>>>> biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
>>>> everyone else stay on-topic.
>>> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like
>>> to complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
>>> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
>>> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
>>>
>>> Michael
>> WRONG. America is full of rights... ever hear of a little thing
>> called
>> the constitution? Free speech? I have the RIGHT on Usenet,
>> alt-fast.food specifically, to say how great fast-food is.
>
> Jerry, Jerry, Jerry... of course you have the right to express yourself.
> Yes you do. However, you do not have the right to censor others, OR, as
> you wrote yourself; "I have a right to dictate that everyone else stay
> on-topic". You don't have that right Jerry. No one has that right on
> Usenet unless the group is moderated. Now, if you want to play God, I
> suggest you spit out the Big Mac, get off your fat ass, and do the work
> it takes to start your own moderated group. When that is done, you will
> have the right to moderate posts as you see fit. The question is, will
> you be able to stand it... sitting there, stuffing your face and talking
> only to yourself?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
Wow, Michael, I'm impressed. You really can get riled up at idiots. <VBG>

Of course I cut out the other two newsgroups this was addressed to as I
don't read them anyway.

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
5.247...
> "Jerry Sauk" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
> >
> > "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
> > .250...
> >> "Jerry Sauk" >
> >> : in
> >> rec.food.cooking
> >>
> >>
> >> > NOBODY owns alt.food.fast-food. but for year's I have been the
> >> > biggest on-topic poster, which means I have a right to dictate that
> >> > everyone else stay on-topic.
> >>
> >> Ohhhh... Then you're like a few we have in RFC I suppose. They like
> >> to complain about off topic posts... until the off topic is about
> >> something they would like to talk about... Is that it? Besides, you
> >> have no rights on Usenet. None. None of us do.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >
> > WRONG. America is full of rights... ever hear of a little thing
> > called
> > the constitution? Free speech? I have the RIGHT on Usenet,
> > alt-fast.food specifically, to say how great fast-food is.
>
> Jerry, Jerry, Jerry... of course you have the right to express yourself.
> Yes you do. However, you do not have the right to censor others, OR, as
> you wrote yourself; "I have a right to dictate that everyone else stay
> on-topic". You don't have that right Jerry. No one has that right on
> Usenet unless the group is moderated. Now, if you want to play God, I
> suggest you spit out the Big Mac, get off your fat ass, and do the work
> it takes to start your own moderated group. When that is done, you will
> have the right to moderate posts as you see fit. The question is, will
> you be able to stand it... sitting there, stuffing your face and talking
> only to yourself?
>
> Michael
>

Im not censoring anyone. I'll I'm saying is, is if you want to talk
about british political things, take it to the british group and not
alt-fast-food.

I dont have time or the knowledge to make a moderated group, and I shouldn't
have to because we're all adults and AND SHOULD be able to keep[ it
on-topic. ourselves