On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:49:26 -0400, Paco wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:39:00 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>>>>>> news >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Boy did THIS thread ever deteriorate! Poor Koko. :-(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it did. Right after Cybercat had to chime in with her trademark
>>>>>> churlishness.
>>>>>
>>>>> I so 0UUN you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. Just call me Blake.
>>>
>>> It's okay that you have a hard-on for Blake. He seems like an open-minded
>>> guy. Talk to him about it.
>>
>> not my cup of tea, actually. still, attention is attention.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> Careful there, Murph. "She's" already made a snide reference to your
> orientation.

nope, she called me 'open-minded.' more poor reading comprehension on your
part.

blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:49:26 -0400, Paco wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:39:00 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> news >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boy did THIS thread ever deteriorate! Poor Koko. :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it did. Right after Cybercat had to chime in with her
>>>>>>> trademark
>>>>>>> churlishness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I so 0UUN you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Just call me Blake.
>>>>
>>>> It's okay that you have a hard-on for Blake. He seems like an
>>>> open-minded
>>>> guy. Talk to him about it.
>>>
>>> not my cup of tea, actually. still, attention is attention.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>>
>> Careful there, Murph. "She's" already made a snide reference to your
>> orientation.
>
> nope, she called me 'open-minded.' more poor reading comprehension on
> your
> part.
>

Yeah. What I meant was, Paco might confess his intense and strange obsession
with you, TO you, without fear. If it helps him. God knows, he needs help.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:49:26 -0400, Paco wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:39:00 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> news >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boy did THIS thread ever deteriorate! Poor Koko. :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it did. Right after Cybercat had to chime in with her
>>>>>>> trademark
>>>>>>> churlishness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I so 0UUN you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Just call me Blake.
>>>>
>>>> It's okay that you have a hard-on for Blake. He seems like an
>>>> open-minded
>>>> guy. Talk to him about it.
>>>
>>> not my cup of tea, actually. still, attention is attention.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>>
>> Careful there, Murph. "She's" already made a snide reference to your
>> orientation.
>
> nope, she called me 'open-minded.' more poor reading comprehension on
> your
> part.
>
P.S. Let's keep this thread alive. It showcases the nutcase.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:49:26 -0400, Paco wrote:
>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:39:00 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> news >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boy did THIS thread ever deteriorate! Poor Koko. :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it did. Right after Cybercat had to chime in with her
>>>>>>> trademark
>>>>>>> churlishness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I so 0UUN you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Just call me Blake.
>>>>
>>>> It's okay that you have a hard-on for Blake. He seems like an
>>>> open-minded
>>>> guy. Talk to him about it.
>>>
>>> not my cup of tea, actually. still, attention is attention.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake
>>
>> Careful there, Murph. "She's" already made a snide reference to your
>> orientation.
>
> nope, she called me 'open-minded.' more poor reading comprehension on
> your
> part.
>
> blake

Yeah, but I was considering the source of the reference, more than the
comment made. But you are right, my reply was pretty lame. Oh well, shit
happens.

Paco wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:39:00 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>
> >> "Paco" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
> >>>> "Paco" > wrote in message
> . ..
>
> >>>>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
> >>>>>news
>
> >>>>>> Boy did THIS thread ever deteriorate! *Poor Koko. :-(
>
> >>>>> Yes, it did. *Right after Cybercat had to chime in with her trademark
> >>>>> churlishness.
>
> >>>> I *so 0UUN you.
>
> >>> Yeah. *Just call me Blake.
>
> >> It's okay that you have a hard-on for Blake. He seems like an open-minded
> >> guy. Talk to him about it.
>
> > not my cup of tea, actually. *still, attention is attention.
>
> > your pal,
> > blake
>
> Careful there, Murph. *"She's" already made a snide reference to your
> orientation.


"cybercat who tries to survive without pension

For a dime blows cocks at the slightest mention

Now who would suppose

That with her long, ugly noze

She'd shove it past blake's hemorrhoid extension..."


:-)


--
Best
Greg