We're not holding our scheduled cook-in this weekend because
a) it's still a madhouse, with the guys moving into the basement
b) I'm sick as the proverbial dog
c) no one came anyway

Many thanks to Barb Schaller for suggesting we change our original
date to clear the way for the cook-in she really wanted to attend.
Sorry I couldn't make it to that one. I would really like to have met
June and Tammy. (Nothing against those two ladies at all.)

I wouldn't have said anything, but I'm very, very, sick, my Minnesota
Nice filters are down, and the more I think about it, the more ****ed
off I get. I hate being manipulated.

Barb, FOAD. Stop pretending to be my friend. BTW, there are lots of
you out there who *think* she likes you. I know better.

With great bitterness,
Carol, going back to bed and hoping to die of a Sudafed overdose

Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
point, but I guess it's too late now.

I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.

Oops!

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote:

>Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
>point, but I guess it's too late now.
>
>I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.
>
>Oops!

Open that post in Agent.... then click on
Post (on your toolbar) > cancel usenet message.
--
See return address to reply by email

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:17:25 -0700, sf wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote:
>
>>Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>>wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
>>point, but I guess it's too late now.
>>
>>I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.
>>
>>Oops!
>
>Open that post in Agent.... then click on
>Post (on your toolbar) > cancel usenet message.

I've done that now. I'm embarassed. And I'm gonna KF the thread.

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
:

> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:17:25 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote:
>>
>>>Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>>>wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at
this
>>>point, but I guess it's too late now.
>>>
>>>I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.
>>>
>>>Oops!
>>
>>Open that post in Agent.... then click on
>>Post (on your toolbar) > cancel usenet message.
>
> I've done that now. I'm embarassed. And I'm gonna KF the thread.
>


Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> Barb, FOAD. Stop pretending to be my friend. BTW, there are lots of
> you out there who *think* she likes you. I know better.

Does this mean I won't ever get any more jam? <pout>
I've been thinking of that wickedly good cherry stuff of hers. Damn.

On 2006-10-10, PeterL > wrote:

> Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!

No kidding. Which Barb is getting the barbs. The Barb of the first
part I know, but who's the Barb of the second part? Or, are they the
same Barb and Dams is just cycling through one of her psychotic
episodes?

Should I be runnning for a lawnchair and popcorn?

nb

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:49:35 -0500, notbob > wrote:

>On 2006-10-10, PeterL > wrote:
>
>> Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!
>
>No kidding. Which Barb is getting the barbs. The Barb of the first
>part I know, but who's the Barb of the second part? Or, are they the
>same Barb and Dams is just cycling through one of her psychotic
>episodes?
>
>Should I be runnning for a lawnchair and popcorn?
>
>nb

Come into chat.... all your questions will be answered there.


--
See return address to reply by email

notbob > wrote in
:

> On 2006-10-10, PeterL > wrote:
>
>> Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!
>
> No kidding. Which Barb is getting the barbs. The Barb of the first
> part I know, but who's the Barb of the second part? Or, are they the
> same Barb and Dams is just cycling through one of her psychotic
> episodes?
>
> Should I be runnning for a lawnchair and popcorn?
>


Grab me a couple of beers when you get the popcorn, OK?



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

One time on Usenet, said:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:49:35 -0500, notbob > wrote:
> >On 2006-10-10, PeterL > wrote:

> >> Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!

> >No kidding. Which Barb is getting the barbs. The Barb of the first
> >part I know, but who's the Barb of the second part? Or, are they the
> >same Barb and Dams is just cycling through one of her psychotic
> >episodes?
> >
> >Should I be runnning for a lawnchair and popcorn?

> Come into chat.... all your questions will be answered there.
>
>

No fair! I was out all evening. I never know what's going on...

--
"Little Malice" is Jani in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

On 2006-10-10, Little Malice > wrote:

> No fair! I was out all evening. I never know what's going on...

I joined, I listened, I... Well, let's just say the ladies are not to
be trifled with tonight.

nb

unge (Little Malice) wrote in news:egfb2s$20cs_
:

> One time on Usenet, said:
>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:49:35 -0500, notbob >
wrote:
>> >On 2006-10-10, PeterL > wrote:
>
>> >> Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!
>
>> >No kidding. Which Barb is getting the barbs. The Barb of the first
>> >part I know, but who's the Barb of the second part? Or, are they
the
>> >same Barb and Dams is just cycling through one of her psychotic
>> >episodes?
>> >
>> >Should I be runnning for a lawnchair and popcorn?
>
>> Come into chat.... all your questions will be answered there.
>>
>>
>
> No fair! I was out all evening. I never know what's going on...
>


Dirty Little Stopout!!! :-)


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

notbob > wrote in
:

> On 2006-10-10, Little Malice > wrote:
>
>> No fair! I was out all evening. I never know what's going on...
>
> I joined, I listened, I... Well, let's just say the ladies are not
to
> be trifled with tonight.
>
> nb


Bugger!!

Now I'll have to dig up that bloody chat channel thingy again.........



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> Barb, FOAD. Stop pretending to be my friend. BTW, there are lots of
> you out there who *think* she likes you. I know better.

That's the peril of on-line friendships. <shrug>

-L.

sf wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> > wrote:
>
>> Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>> wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
>> point, but I guess it's too late now.
>>
>> I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.

Hmm, okey, why am I not getting damsel's posts at all??

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music, Recipes, Photos, and mo

http://www.sequoiagrove.dk

"You don´t frighten us, English pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottoms, sons
of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and
all your silly English kaniggets. Thppppt!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:29:27 +0200, Michael Archon Sequoia Nielsen
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>>> wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
>>> point, but I guess it's too late now.
>>>
>>> I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.
>
>Hmm, okey, why am I not getting damsel's posts at all??

Because she cancelled them all before the server could spread them
far? I can't see her messages in this thread either, just the
replies...

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:25:13 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:17:25 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote:
>>
>>>Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>>>wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
>>>point, but I guess it's too late now.
>>>
>>>I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.
>>>
>>>Oops!
>>
>>Open that post in Agent.... then click on
>>Post (on your toolbar) > cancel usenet message.
>
> I've done that now. I'm embarassed. And I'm gonna KF the thread.

Most ISPs no longer honor cancels because of abuse (people cancelling each
others posts). I just checked Usenet today and was still able to download
your article using Verizon dsl.

--

-Jeff B.
zoomie at fastmail fm

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:03:47 -0700, sf wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:49:35 -0500, notbob > wrote:
>
>>On 2006-10-10, PeterL > wrote:
>>
>>> Damn!! And it was just getting interesting too!!
>>
>>No kidding. Which Barb is getting the barbs. The Barb of the first
>>part I know, but who's the Barb of the second part? Or, are they the
>>same Barb and Dams is just cycling through one of her psychotic
>>episodes?
>>
>>Should I be runnning for a lawnchair and popcorn?
>>
>>nb
>
>Come into chat.... all your questions will be answered there.
>
>

This whole thing sucks.

TammyM, shaking my head in dismay

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:27:44 GMT, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:57:47 -0400, Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
>
>> Because she cancelled them all before the server could spread them
>> far? I can't see her messages in this thread either, just the
>> replies...
>
>They were canceled off of my server as well. Which is weird
>because cancels are hardly ever propagated and acted upon.

Consider yourself lucky. That was a hateful message and I am stunned.
You think you "know" someone....

TammyM, learning all kinds of sad things today

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> Many thanks to Barb Schaller for suggesting we change our original
> date to clear the way for the cook-in she really wanted to attend.

For shame, Carol. Your behavior disappoints me.

This is what I know. As of August, I hadn't read RFC in months and had
no idea you were planning a cook-in. Tammy was coming to visit Barb.
Barb emailed and suggested a joint dinner outing because I'd never met
Tammy, and Barb knows I'd travel to the cities for a good meal. I said,
hey, well, let's make it a true WWT and have a cook-in instead! We can
do it at my house!

And you know what Barb said to me when I sprung the idea? She said
(emailed), and I quote, "Maybe you could invite Carol and Crash? ...I
think Tammy would like to meet Damsel and vice versa." And I'll be
honest, I hadn't read rfc for at least half a year, it didn't even
occur to me to invite you until Barb asked me to!

She doesn't deserve this, Carol. Barb is a good person and has been a
good friend to me for a long time.

-j.

On 11 Oct 2006 12:33:55 -0700, " >
wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> Many thanks to Barb Schaller for suggesting we change our original
>> date to clear the way for the cook-in she really wanted to attend.
>
>For shame, Carol. Your behavior disappoints me.
>
>This is what I know. As of August, I hadn't read RFC in months and had
>no idea you were planning a cook-in. Tammy was coming to visit Barb.
>Barb emailed and suggested a joint dinner outing because I'd never met
>Tammy, and Barb knows I'd travel to the cities for a good meal. I said,
>hey, well, let's make it a true WWT and have a cook-in instead! We can
>do it at my house!
>
>And you know what Barb said to me when I sprung the idea? She said
>(emailed), and I quote, "Maybe you could invite Carol and Crash? ...I
>think Tammy would like to meet Damsel and vice versa." And I'll be
>honest, I hadn't read rfc for at least half a year, it didn't even
>occur to me to invite you until Barb asked me to!
>
>She doesn't deserve this, Carol. Barb is a good person and has been a
>good friend to me for a long time.

Ditto. I rarely engage in usenet battles OR quote the whole text of a
message, but this debacle really hacks my chops. I have ALL of the
emails to back up what June has accurately stated. FTR. Not that I'd
post 'em, that would be as inexcusable as the original offense.
Saying FOAD to a FRIEND who speaks so highly of you is pretty shitty.
And so is impugning her reputation.

BAD FORM, Dams, badly done. IMO you owe Barb an apology. Preferably
a public one.

TammyM

One time on Usenet, " > said:

<snip>

> She doesn't deserve this, Carol. Barb is a good person and has been a
> good friend to me for a long time.

I hate it when people I like fight... :-(

--
"Little Malice" is Jani in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

Steve Wertz wrote:
>
> Oh - I saw the posts. [Pbbbt] You think I'm not going to hunt
> down a message as juicy as that? Huh.

It's still on Google.

Karen AKA Kajikit wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:29:27 +0200, Michael Archon Sequoia Nielsen
> > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:37:50 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Holy shit! I wondered why that didn't go through a month ago, when I
>>>> wrote it. I'm feeling better now, and wouldn't have posted it at this
>>>> point, but I guess it's too late now.
>>>>
>>>> I still feel the same way, just not as strongly.
>> Hmm, okey, why am I not getting damsel's posts at all??
>
> Because she cancelled them all before the server could spread them
> far? I can't see her messages in this thread either, just the
> replies...


The message ID is >

HTH,
Bob

In article >,
Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> We're not holding our scheduled cook-in this weekend

I thought that cook-in had been cancelled some time ago after
teetering for a while on "it's happening"/"it's not happening" ...

A _very_ disappointing reaction on your part, Carol -- and certainly
not one any of us should have seen -- especially Barb, who did not
do this to you.

I hope you recover soon.

sd

For those who have "OT" posts filtered ...

I have made a public apology to Barb, and she has accepted. We are
exchanging e-mail.

At the time, I believed that everything I wrote was true and accurate.
In fact, it was neither. It was written in a psychotic rage. Not
figuratively, literally.

I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
aggressive treatment for my condition.

I regret the results of my actions on everyone who was affected.

Carol

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> For those who have "OT" posts filtered ...
>
> I have made a public apology to Barb, and she has accepted. We are
> exchanging e-mail.
>
> At the time, I believed that everything I wrote was true and accurate.
> In fact, it was neither. It was written in a psychotic rage. Not
> figuratively, literally.
>
> I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
> aggressive treatment for my condition.
>
> I regret the results of my actions on everyone who was affected.

Hope treatment goes well!

--
Dan Goodman
All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.
Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com
Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood
Blog http://dsgood.googlepages.com

On 13 Oct 2006 01:42:03 GMT, "Dan Goodman" > wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
>> I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
>> aggressive treatment for my condition.
>
>Hope treatment goes well!

Me too. This can't continue.

Thanks, Dan.

"Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> For those who have "OT" posts filtered ...
>
> I have made a public apology to Barb, and she has accepted. We are
> exchanging e-mail.
>
> At the time, I believed that everything I wrote was true and accurate.
> In fact, it was neither. It was written in a psychotic rage. Not
> figuratively, literally.
>
> I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
> aggressive treatment for my condition.
>
> I regret the results of my actions on everyone who was affected.

Your goodness shows. Wishing you well, and God's speed.

Take care of yourself, dear.

warmly,
TammyM

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
:

> On 13 Oct 2006 01:42:03 GMT, "Dan Goodman" > wrote:
>
>>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>>> I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
>>> aggressive treatment for my condition.
>>
>>Hope treatment goes well!
>
> Me too. This can't continue.
>


Don't sweat it Dams......... all of us are crazy to a certain extent.
Some more so than others, but we're *all* nutcases nonetheless :-)



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

> On 13 Oct 2006 01:42:03 GMT, "Dan Goodman" > wrote:
>
> > Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >
> >> I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
> >> aggressive treatment for my condition.
> >
> > Hope treatment goes well!
>
> Me too. This can't continue.

Some people enjoy it. And some people see it as a sign of superiority.

> Thanks, Dan.



--
Dan Goodman
All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.
Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com
Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood
Blog http://dsgood.googlepages.com

PeterL wrote:
>
> Don't sweat it Dams......... all of us are crazy to a certain extent.
> Some more so than others, but we're *all* nutcases nonetheless :-)

Here's my evidence, that I'm a bit crazy:

http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/rabbit.avi

or as a flash (may be too CPU demanding on your computer):

http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/rabbit.html

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music, Recipes, Photos, and mo

http://www.sequoiagrove.dk

"You don´t frighten us, English pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottoms, sons
of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and
all your silly English kaniggets. Thppppt!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:05:11 +0200, Michael Archon Sequoia Nielsen
> wrote:

>Here's my evidence, that I'm a bit crazy:
>
>http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/rabbit.avi
>
>or as a flash (may be too CPU demanding on your computer):
>
>http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/rabbit.html

That's great! Who knew that "Earl" could actually be handsome? The
end is a stitch! Thanks for the laugh!

In article >,
Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> On 13 Oct 2006 01:42:03 GMT, "Dan Goodman" > wrote:
>
> >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >
> >> I have an appointment with my shrink on Tuesday, and will request
> >> aggressive treatment for my condition.
> >
> >Hope treatment goes well!
>
> Me too. This can't continue.

Thank you for the explanation and apology, Carol. Good luck with the
treatment. Don't let this beat you!

sd

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> Here's my evidence, that I'm a bit crazy:
>>
>> http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/rabbit.avi
>>
>> or as a flash (may be too CPU demanding on your computer):
>>
>> http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/rabbit.html
>
> That's great! Who knew that "Earl" could actually be handsome? The
> end is a stitch! Thanks for the laugh!

I got a pen tablet for my birthday, and I decided to test it by making a
little cartoon and use a little part of a funny little piece of music I
made once, where I sing "you little stupid dog" (in danish).

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music, Recipes, Photos, and mo

http://www.sequoiagrove.dk

"You don´t frighten us, English pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottoms, sons
of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and
all your silly English kaniggets. Thppppt!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------