Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Diabetic (alt.food.diabetic) This group is for the discussion of controlled-portion eating plans for the dietary management of diabetes. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
junk food for diabetes
Someone told me that candies with no sugar on it and popcorn like kettle corn are the best "junk foods" for diabetes. Anyone have other ideas? Thanks Mike |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
There are no candies made without sugar. As for popcorn, the only one I eat
is the one I make. It does not taste as good as the commercial brand because there is no oil or fat added no to mention the salt. Here in Canada the food properties are listed on the product. That does not mean much because there are no agencies controlling what the food processors are listing on their ingredient labels. The best test I can have is when I eat something that is labelled as no sugar added, sugarless or artificial sugar used and my blood sugar goes up I stop buying that food product. > wrote in message oups.com... > junk food for diabetes > > Someone told me that candies with no sugar on it and popcorn like > kettle corn are the best "junk foods" for diabetes. > Anyone have other ideas? > Thanks > Mike > |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
In article >,
> wrote: > There are no candies made without sugar. On the contrary, there are many brands and varieties. Most of them are sweetened with polyols, though, and those can also be a problem for some people. Priscilla |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
There are no candies made without sugar.
Extract from Google What do Polyols do? a.. Polyols are derived from sugars, but they are not processed by the body like sugars. Polyols have many advantages such as reduced calories as compared to sugar, reduced insulin response, ability to be labelled "sugar-free" and "no sugar added", Although the Polyol Comparison Chart shows less calories the data is not validated by any Governmental food agencies. You may have less calories but it requires more insulin to process. While attending diabetic teaching one person used to bring sobitol candies every day. Then we decided to take our blood sugar before eating the sugar-free candies and after. Then we compared the results with people having not ate the sugar-free candies with those who had. It clearly demonstrated that those who had the sugar-free candies had a much higher level of sugar. I was very disappointed. "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > > wrote: > >> There are no candies made without sugar. > > On the contrary, there are many brands and varieties. Most of them are > sweetened with polyols, though, and those can also be a problem for some > people. > > Priscilla |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
In article >,
> wrote: > There are no candies made without sugar. Yet right below you talk about Polyols -- which are NOT sugar -- and "sugar-free" candies sweetened with them. Your logic is faulty. Priscilla > > Extract from Google > > What do Polyols do? > > a.. Polyols are derived from sugars, but they are not processed by the > body like sugars. Polyols have many advantages such as reduced calories as > compared to sugar, reduced insulin response, ability to be labelled > "sugar-free" and "no sugar added", > Although the Polyol Comparison Chart shows less calories the data is not > validated by any Governmental food agencies. > You may have less calories but it requires more insulin to process. > > While attending diabetic teaching one person used to bring sobitol candies > every day. > Then we decided to take our blood sugar before eating the sugar-free candies > and after. Then we compared the results with people having not ate the > sugar-free candies with those who had. It clearly demonstrated that those > who had the sugar-free candies had a much higher level of sugar. > I was very disappointed. > > "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > > wrote: > > > >> There are no candies made without sugar. > > > > On the contrary, there are many brands and varieties. Most of them are > > sweetened with polyols, though, and those can also be a problem for some > > people. > > > > Priscilla |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
Thanks you Priscilla for your reply. I wish I could eat these candies but
they bring my sugar up. So here at our diabetic teaching center, corroborated by in the field testing, they do not suggest you eat them thinking that your blood sugar will not go up. The decision is your. Have a good week end. "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > > wrote: > >> There are no candies made without sugar. > > Yet right below you talk about Polyols -- which are NOT sugar -- and > "sugar-free" candies sweetened with them. > > Your logic is faulty. > > Priscilla > >> >> Extract from Google >> >> What do Polyols do? >> >> a.. Polyols are derived from sugars, but they are not processed by the >> body like sugars. Polyols have many advantages such as reduced calories >> as >> compared to sugar, reduced insulin response, ability to be labelled >> "sugar-free" and "no sugar added", >> Although the Polyol Comparison Chart shows less calories the data is not >> validated by any Governmental food agencies. >> You may have less calories but it requires more insulin to process. >> >> While attending diabetic teaching one person used to bring sobitol >> candies >> every day. >> Then we decided to take our blood sugar before eating the sugar-free >> candies >> and after. Then we compared the results with people having not ate the >> sugar-free candies with those who had. It clearly demonstrated that >> those >> who had the sugar-free candies had a much higher level of sugar. >> I was very disappointed. >> >> "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article >, >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> There are no candies made without sugar. >> > >> > On the contrary, there are many brands and varieties. Most of them are >> > sweetened with polyols, though, and those can also be a problem for >> > some >> > people. >> > >> > Priscilla |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
> wrote in message ... > There are no candies made without sugar. As for popcorn, the only one I eat > is the one I make. It does not taste as good as the commercial brand > because there is no oil or fat added no to mention the salt. > Here in Canada the food properties are listed on the product. That does not > mean much because there are no agencies controlling what the food processors > are listing on their ingredient labels. The best test I can have is when I > eat something that is labelled as no sugar added, sugarless or artificial > sugar used and my blood sugar goes up I stop buying that food product. There are sugar free candies. But they're no better for us than the real ones. -- See my webpage: http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
In article >,
> wrote: > Thanks you Priscilla for your reply. I wish I could eat these candies but > they bring my sugar up. > So here at our diabetic teaching center, corroborated by in the field > testing, they do not suggest you eat them thinking that your blood sugar > will not go up. The decision is your. Have a good week end. > > "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > > wrote: > > > >> There are no candies made without sugar. > > > > Yet right below you talk about Polyols -- which are NOT sugar -- and > > "sugar-free" candies sweetened with them. > > > > Your logic is faulty. > > > > Priscilla > > > >> > >> Extract from Google > >> > >> What do Polyols do? > >> > >> a.. Polyols are derived from sugars, but they are not processed by the > >> body like sugars. Polyols have many advantages such as reduced calories > >> as > >> compared to sugar, reduced insulin response, ability to be labelled > >> "sugar-free" and "no sugar added", > >> Although the Polyol Comparison Chart shows less calories the data is not > >> validated by any Governmental food agencies. > >> You may have less calories but it requires more insulin to process. > >> > >> While attending diabetic teaching one person used to bring sobitol > >> candies > >> every day. > >> Then we decided to take our blood sugar before eating the sugar-free > >> candies > >> and after. Then we compared the results with people having not ate the > >> sugar-free candies with those who had. It clearly demonstrated that > >> those > >> who had the sugar-free candies had a much higher level of sugar. > >> I was very disappointed. > >> > >> "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > In article >, > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> >> There are no candies made without sugar. > >> > > >> > On the contrary, there are many brands and varieties. Most of them are > >> > sweetened with polyols, though, and those can also be a problem for > >> > some > >> > people. > >> > > >> > Priscilla The fact that they raise your blood sugar does not mean that there is sugar in the candies. I am not arguing for sugarless candy -- I don't eat it myself. I am arguing for accuracy. Priscilla |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
The fact that they raise your blood sugar does not mean that there is
> sugar in the candies. I am not arguing for sugarless candy -- I don't > eat it myself. I am arguing for accuracy. > > Priscilla Your point is well taken. I have been looking for accuracy for a long time. I wonder if it really exist or is it what you or they make of it http://www.flatsurv.com/accuprec.htm The old school that sugar is the culprit in diabetes may have to be updated. http://www.diabetes.org/nutrition-an...tion/sugar.jsp http://www.lowcarb.ca/articlesa/article215.html Have a good day and don't get to upset at me. "Priscilla Ballou" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > > wrote: > >> Thanks you Priscilla for your reply. I wish I could eat these candies >> but >> they bring my sugar up. >> So here at our diabetic teaching center, corroborated by in the field >> testing, they do not suggest you eat them thinking that your blood sugar >> will not go up. The decision is your. Have a good week end. >> >> "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article >, >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> There are no candies made without sugar. >> > >> > Yet right below you talk about Polyols -- which are NOT sugar -- and >> > "sugar-free" candies sweetened with them. >> > >> > Your logic is faulty. >> > >> > Priscilla >> > >> >> >> >> Extract from Google >> >> >> >> What do Polyols do? >> >> >> >> a.. Polyols are derived from sugars, but they are not processed by >> >> the >> >> body like sugars. Polyols have many advantages such as reduced >> >> calories >> >> as >> >> compared to sugar, reduced insulin response, ability to be labelled >> >> "sugar-free" and "no sugar added", >> >> Although the Polyol Comparison Chart shows less calories the data is >> >> not >> >> validated by any Governmental food agencies. >> >> You may have less calories but it requires more insulin to process. >> >> >> >> While attending diabetic teaching one person used to bring sobitol >> >> candies >> >> every day. >> >> Then we decided to take our blood sugar before eating the sugar-free >> >> candies >> >> and after. Then we compared the results with people having not ate >> >> the >> >> sugar-free candies with those who had. It clearly demonstrated that >> >> those >> >> who had the sugar-free candies had a much higher level of sugar. >> >> I was very disappointed. >> >> >> >> "Priscilla H. Ballou" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article >, >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> There are no candies made without sugar. >> >> > >> >> > On the contrary, there are many brands and varieties. Most of them >> >> > are >> >> > sweetened with polyols, though, and those can also be a problem for >> >> > some >> >> > people. >> >> > >> >> > Priscilla > > The fact that they raise your blood sugar does not mean that there is > sugar in the candies. I am not arguing for sugarless candy -- I don't > eat it myself. I am arguing for accuracy. > > Priscilla |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
> wrote in message ... > The fact that they raise your blood sugar does not mean that there is > > sugar in the candies. I am not arguing for sugarless candy -- I don't > > eat it myself. I am arguing for accuracy. > > > > Priscilla > > Your point is well taken. I have been looking for accuracy for a long time. > I wonder if it really exist or is it what you or they make of it > http://www.flatsurv.com/accuprec.htm > The old school that sugar is the culprit in diabetes may have to be updated. > http://www.diabetes.org/nutrition-an...tion/sugar.jsp > http://www.lowcarb.ca/articlesa/article215.html > > Have a good day and don't get to upset at me. Actually that old sugar notion hasn't been around for many years. Now of course the general public still seems to believe this but the medical profession does not. -- See my webpage: http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
Thanks for your reply. I visited your site and found it interesting. My
daughter gave me the Joslin Diabetic Manual but their web site is more up to date. "Julie Bove" > wrote in message news:fj9cg.4831$Ar6.4758@trnddc02... > > > > > wrote in message > ... >> The fact that they raise your blood sugar does not mean that there is >> > sugar in the candies. I am not arguing for sugarless candy -- I don't >> > eat it myself. I am arguing for accuracy. >> > >> > Priscilla >> >> Your point is well taken. I have been looking for accuracy for a long > time. >> I wonder if it really exist or is it what you or they make of it >> http://www.flatsurv.com/accuprec.htm >> The old school that sugar is the culprit in diabetes may have to be > updated. >> http://www.diabetes.org/nutrition-an...tion/sugar.jsp >> http://www.lowcarb.ca/articlesa/article215.html >> >> Have a good day and don't get to upset at me. > > Actually that old sugar notion hasn't been around for many years. Now of > course the general public still seems to believe this but the medical > profession does not. > > -- > See my webpage: > http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm > > |
Posted to alt.food.diabetic
|
|||
|
|||
junk food for diabetes
> Anyone have other ideas? Hi Mike For snack and junk I like different nuts, just plain or saltet.. Different seeds, like pumpkinseeds, are nice too. They do not have any carbs, and the fat is the good kind of fat, that we need to keep healthy. Dried fruit in small amounts, because they have many carbs.. But a litlle dried pineapple, apple, mango etc can set the urge for sweets.. Fruit or vegetables are also good alternatives, because you get the feeling of being full. Home made popcorn are allright as well, as long as they are made low fat.. I take the dried corn and put them in a hot pan with a drop of oil. Then put the lid on and shake a litlle while they pop. They are done when you no longer hear the "explosions" from the corn.. Try add different spices for flavour, or some herb-salt.. Just some ideas here from Denmark Louise T1 since 1994 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Junk Food | General Cooking | |||
Junk Food | General Cooking | |||
Mexico bans junk foods in schools, now there is nothing to eat in the land of junk food | General Cooking | |||
Junk Food - 2 new | Diabetic | |||
Junk food | Vegan |