Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Waterless Cooking
Does anyone have an opinion on waterless cooking?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
|||
|
|||
Waterless Cooking
After following the thread here for a while I did a little research
on this topic. It's certainly not exhaustive but it seems to me that the following is pretty well documented. The term "Waterless Cooker" was an exclusive trade name for a line of cookware from West Bend in the 1920's. It's primary claim to fame was that using their cookware and methods - compared to boiling foods in water - was faster and retained more vitamins. It doesn't appear that this claim was particularly researched at the time, although boiling does leach out some vitamins, and it was mainly marketing hype. Since then various companies have touted the benefits of waterless cooking over just about every other method and all kinds of gimmicks have been added to the cookware, such as pressure release valves that are supposed to signal you to turn down the heat. As far as I can tell the addition of that particular gimmick is about all that differentiates "waterless cookers" from any other well made stainless steel cookware. It should also be noted that part of the hype was the safety of stainless steel cookware over aluminum. Part of the selling methods for this stuff involves some "demonstrations" designed to show that stainless steel doesn't flavor food the way aluminum or cast iron does. They are pretty dramatic, but still hype designed to scare the hell out of the ignorant. As far as the cooking method goes, there's not a thing about it that I can see after reading a number of waterless cooking recipes that actually depend upon or require anything other than normal stainless steel cookware with reasonably tight fitting lids. Keep in mind that this stuff was originally marketed claiming to retain vitamins over boiling your food. How many people these days boil a significant amount of what they cook? When was the last time you boiled your broccoli? A particularly suspect part of this whole business is the marketing of the cookware. As someone else pointed out, it seems to have about as much legitimacy as Amway. YMMV. Jim Doug Reynolds wrote: > Does anyone have an opinion on waterless cooking? > > > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
|||
|
|||
Waterless Cooking
"Doug Reynolds" > wrote in message ... > Does anyone have an opinion on waterless cooking? > No. I have yet to see an explanation of how it works. |
|
|||
|
|||
Waterless Cooking
"Doug Reynolds" > wrote in message
... : Does anyone have an opinion on waterless cooking? : ========= Funny Doug. Really funny. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looking For Waterless Cookware | Cooking Equipment | |||
Waterless Cooking (one more time) | Cooking Equipment | |||
Waterless Cooking: Cooking and nutrient loss | Cooking Equipment | |||
KitchenCraft cookware and waterless cooking | General Cooking | |||
KitchenCraft cookware and waterless cooking | Cooking Equipment |