![]() |
Which KA stand mixer?
Which KitchenAid stand mixer would you purchase amongst:
Classic 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 250W Ultra Power 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 300W Artisan 9 cup / 5 qt / 325W All are tilt head For the purposes of discussion ignore the (IMO, insignificant) price difference amongst these product lines. (Accolade is too expensive for my needs) What I plan to make: pizza dough pasta dough chapati cookies pancakes cake from mix relatively small quantities so even 8 cup will be plenty of capacity I'm finding when using my hand mixer I end up needing another hand! (as well as making a big mess) any comments will be appreciated but I will only be considering the KitchenAid brand for this purchase thanks Sathyan |
|
> wrote in message oups.com... > Which KitchenAid stand mixer would you purchase amongst: > > Classic 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 250W > Ultra Power 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 300W > Artisan 9 cup / 5 qt / 325W > > All are tilt head > For the purposes of discussion ignore the (IMO, insignificant) price > difference amongst these product lines. > > (Accolade is too expensive for my needs) > > > > What I plan to make: > pizza dough > pasta dough > chapati > cookies > pancakes > cake from mix > > > relatively small quantities so even 8 cup will be plenty of capacity > > I'm finding when using my hand mixer I end up needing another hand! (as > well as making a big mess) > > any comments will be appreciated but I will only be considering the > KitchenAid brand for this purchase > > thanks > Sathyan > I have a 20+ yo mixer that is the 8-cup/ 4.5 qt capacity. I sometimes wish I had the bigger one, since my favorite bread is almost too much dough to make at once! I'm sure I'm pushing the envelope, but my mixer keeps on chugging away. It is my dream to someday get the bigger one! Dawn |
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:10:35 +0100, LRod
> wrote: >On 29 Jun 2005 13:20:55 -0700, wrote: > >>Which KitchenAid stand mixer would you purchase amongst: >> >>Classic 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 250W >>Ultra Power 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 300W >>Artisan 9 cup / 5 qt / 325W > >Being a woodworker, I am accustomed to tools with motors ranging from >1 to 3 HP (floor tools--hand tools are somewhat smaller). I even gave >thought to a 5 HP saw once, but EVERYONE advised that 3 HP was more >than adequate for a home shop, and I'm convinced they are right. >Anyway, even a 1 HP motor can be a brute and (ignoring precise >efficiency factors for the sake of argument) normally is considered to >draw something on the order of 7 or 8 amps at 120V (nominal North >American voltage). That's around 850 watts of power. > >My point is that the hand appliance people like to market their motors >in terms of watts so that they can have hundreds of them to advertise >and to beguile the consumer. That 250W motor is less than 1/3 HP and >the 325W is still well less than ½ HP. The actual difference in >amperage draw is .62. Yes, just over half an amp; less than 10% of 1 >HP. The difference in actual work performed between 250W and 325W >probably couldn't be measured by actual use in the kitchen. > >Fun with numbers. Perspective is everything. Hello again, Indeed, the difference may be less than "10% of one HP" but that would seem to be an odd way of looking at it. These are not tugboat engines we are looking at. Assuming for the moment that the wattage is accurately described, is not 325W 50% more power output than 250W? The important comparison would not be in the absolute difference, but in the relative difference. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
> wrote in message oups.com... > Which KitchenAid stand mixer would you purchase amongst: > > Classic 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 250W > Ultra Power 8 cup / 4.5 qt / 300W > Artisan 9 cup / 5 qt / 325W No one has ever complained that an appliance is too good or too powerful. |
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:45:56 -0400, Kenneth >
wrote: >Assuming for the moment that the wattage is accurately >described, is not 325W 50% more power output than 250W? Not. Perhaps in some non-decimal number system. 8;) -- Larry |
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:01:05 -0400, pltrgyst
> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:45:56 -0400, Kenneth > >wrote: > >>Assuming for the moment that the wattage is accurately >>described, is not 325W 50% more power output than 250W? > >Not. Perhaps in some non-decimal number system. 8;) > >-- Larry Ooops, My arithmetic error <g>. That should have read: Assuming for the moment that the wattage is accurately described, is not 325W 30% more power output than 250W? ^^^ but the point remains the same... All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter