FoodBanter.com

FoodBanter.com (https://www.foodbanter.com/)
-   Chocolate (https://www.foodbanter.com/chocolate/)
-   -   Another question about chocolate making... (https://www.foodbanter.com/chocolate/806-another-question-about-chocolate.html)

Stef 23-02-2004 02:12 AM

Another question about chocolate making...
 
After posting my first question, I thought about something I wanted to
include...

When trying out new recipes and experimenting, what do you use as far as
chocolate is concerned? I ask this b/c I don't want to use a really
expensive chocolate to "play" with. Of course, I would use the best
chocolate to test the "finished" product.

Any thoughts?

SC



Alex Rast 23-02-2004 09:04 PM

Another question about chocolate making...
 
at Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:12:06 GMT in >,
(Stef) wrote :

>After posting my first question, I thought about something I wanted to
>include...
>
>When trying out new recipes and experimenting, what do you use as far as
>chocolate is concerned? I ask this b/c I don't want to use a really
>expensive chocolate to "play" with. Of course, I would use the best
>chocolate to test the "finished" product.


The standard Guittard line - Gourmet Bittersweet, French Vanilla, Old Dutch
- is the ideal choice. It's cheap, has excellent handling properties, and
is in fact excellent chocolate anyway. Gourmet Bittersweet is indeed so
good I would consider using it in the finished product anyway. Price isn't
necessarily an immediate indicator of quality.

I'd fine-tune the recipe using the chocolate whose flavour profile were
most attuned to the recipe being attempted - and this is the one I'd use in
the final product. You pretty much have to do your fine-tuning using your
final chocolate selection because each one behaves slightly differently.
But as you suggest, it's best to do your initial testing and
experimentation using a "standard" chocolate, not just because it saves
money, but also because you need a neutral reference, something you test
all recipes against so that when you create a new recipe the choice of
chocolate isn't exerting a variable impact on the results.



--
Alex Rast

(remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply)

SC 23-02-2004 09:12 PM

Another question about chocolate making...
 
Thanks Alex!

SC

"Alex Rast" > wrote in message
...
> at Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:12:06 GMT in >,
> (Stef) wrote :
>
> >After posting my first question, I thought about something I wanted to
> >include...
> >
> >When trying out new recipes and experimenting, what do you use as far as
> >chocolate is concerned? I ask this b/c I don't want to use a really
> >expensive chocolate to "play" with. Of course, I would use the best
> >chocolate to test the "finished" product.

>
> The standard Guittard line - Gourmet Bittersweet, French Vanilla, Old

Dutch
> - is the ideal choice. It's cheap, has excellent handling properties, and
> is in fact excellent chocolate anyway. Gourmet Bittersweet is indeed so
> good I would consider using it in the finished product anyway. Price isn't
> necessarily an immediate indicator of quality.
>
> I'd fine-tune the recipe using the chocolate whose flavour profile were
> most attuned to the recipe being attempted - and this is the one I'd use

in
> the final product. You pretty much have to do your fine-tuning using your
> final chocolate selection because each one behaves slightly differently.
> But as you suggest, it's best to do your initial testing and
> experimentation using a "standard" chocolate, not just because it saves
> money, but also because you need a neutral reference, something you test
> all recipes against so that when you create a new recipe the choice of
> chocolate isn't exerting a variable impact on the results.
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Rast
>

> (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply)





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter