Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Lew Bryson wrote:
>>> >>>>On the web page I see reference to "Bare Knuckle Stout" which I've >>>>never seen but would try. >>> >>>Had it, bought it again, certainly in the style of dry stout. >> >>Had it, thought it sucked, found out the next day it was brewed by A-B. >>Felt good about myself that my intense dislike of it had nothing to do >>with the fact A-B brewed it. > > > Pick it out as "the sucking one" in a blind tasting with Guinness, Murphy's, > and Beamish, and I'll be impressed. I'll just have a Black Wych, thanks. :-| -- Bruce Weaver www.angelfire.com/wv/bwhomedir |
|
|||
|
|||
Joel ) wrote:
: Bill Benzel > wrote: : >Joel ) wrote: : >: >: "Nels E. Satterlund" > wrote: : >: >: > ..."Bare Knuckle Stout" ... : >: : >: Is that the stout they were pouring at the GABF? : > : >Definitely not as I was not at GABF. Also did not run into it in the : >staging area at WBC while stewarding and I'm not sure it was entered as : >that was back in March and I ran into it more like July this year. : : I'm struggling to figure out how you not being at : GABF and not seeing it at WBC means it was a different : A-B stout that I tasted at the GABF. Has A-B brewed : and marketed more than one stout in the past six months? Sorry, I misunderstood the question -- so the answer to both the original and the new question is a resounding "I don't know." I read your first one as asking whether I'd tried it at GABF. Some days I really detest this medium. I am soooo misunderstood. -- Bill reply to sirwill1 AT same domain as above |
|
|||
|
|||
> Just had a damn near perfect pour of Guinness yesterday, and I'm not sure
> I'd agree with you. I want to try this blind tasting myself, because I think > it might be an eye-opener. Blind comparison tastings are very educational. > Everyone should do them more often. Wish I could, but Cathy refuses to wear > a blindfold and pour beers nekkid. > Skipping the image of yer wife (whom I've never met) nekkid......... "Blind" tastings have turned out to be perhaps the strongest and most educational weapon in our beer-tasting travails. On a very frequent basis, fellow brewers/imbibers and I subject each other to "here, drink this" or "Surprise us, Casey--within reason" in a bar with 65 taps and 300+ bottles. In the case of the latter, out of the tap list I can almost always pick out what the beer is, or come down to only two possibilities. It's not enough to pick out the beer. You have to be able to say why you like that beer, or dislike it--what's good and what's bad, and why you decided it's this particular beer (even if you've never had it before!). The power of suggestion is enormous. Labeling, as Jim Koch can tell you, is everything. When the biases that make you order, or not order, certain beers are eliminated, anything can happen. You have never lived in this beer hobby until you've: 1) seen a homebrewer reject a beer he himself made but couldn't recognize; and 2) had a brewer literally beg you for the recipe for a high-alcohol beer he himself made six years before you poured it for him, but drank up within two months. Even more evil is to pour four beers in a row, with disguised or removed labels, and tell them "one of these beers is a normal beer; one is a spiced ale; one is an ale with something weirdly different about it, and one is a honey ale--pick them out and elaborate." I had to do this recently with a set of wines where one of the wines had been widely rumored to be illegally doctored with ingredients not listed on the label; I contrasted them with openly-"doctored" and un-"doctored" wines with a panel of experts. We came to the conclusion that there were ways one could pull off the character in question without the adulteration of which the winery was accused. Most evil of all is a stunt I've seen pulled in formal tastings at the Brickskeller in Washington, DC. Either deliberately or accidentally, after you've been subjected to several of the night's beers and have been taking notes as appropriate, they'll suddenly tell you, "Ooops, sorry, we made a mistake--we switched #3 and #4 on your list." Usually this can only be done with new beers or casks that no one in the bar is likely or able to recognize; you can't exactly pull that with a Guinness and a Murphy's, or a Bass and a Boddington's. Or can you? Try it yourself. You'll learn more that way. |
|
|||
|
|||
"Alexander D. Mitchell IV" > wrote in message
> Most evil of all is a stunt I've seen pulled in formal tastings at the I was at a tasting once where three of us were in a room, and the beers were poured in another room -- we didn't know what style they were supposed to be, what brewery they were from, not even if they were bottled, canned, or draft. We had everything from pilsner to abbey to dunkelweizen to IPA...and I sat and listened to two certified beer judges wax eloquent about how wonderful the dubbel was, the dubbel that turned out to be a dunkelweizenbock. Educational. > Try it yourself. You'll learn more that way. Ayup. Even if you can't do it blind, comparison tastings are still useful. I like to do my whiskey tasting that way, tasting new whiskeys against "known quantities." Really brings out the differences. -- Lew Bryson www.LewBryson.com Author of "New York Breweries" and "Pennsylvania Breweries," 2nd ed., both available at <www.amazon.com> The Hotmail address on this post is for newsgroups only: I don't check it, or respond to it. Spam away. |
|
|||
|
|||
"Alexander D. Mitchell IV" > wrote in message
> Most evil of all is a stunt I've seen pulled in formal tastings at the I was at a tasting once where three of us were in a room, and the beers were poured in another room -- we didn't know what style they were supposed to be, what brewery they were from, not even if they were bottled, canned, or draft. We had everything from pilsner to abbey to dunkelweizen to IPA...and I sat and listened to two certified beer judges wax eloquent about how wonderful the dubbel was, the dubbel that turned out to be a dunkelweizenbock. Educational. > Try it yourself. You'll learn more that way. Ayup. Even if you can't do it blind, comparison tastings are still useful. I like to do my whiskey tasting that way, tasting new whiskeys against "known quantities." Really brings out the differences. -- Lew Bryson www.LewBryson.com Author of "New York Breweries" and "Pennsylvania Breweries," 2nd ed., both available at <www.amazon.com> The Hotmail address on this post is for newsgroups only: I don't check it, or respond to it. Spam away. |
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 23:49:08 -0500, Alexander D. Mitchell IV wrote:
> Labeling, as Jim Koch can tell you, is everything. How true. Back in the spring of 1978 I was sitting in my dorm room drinking a bottle of Hamm's I purchased on sale at the low price of $ 2.99 a case. One of my floor mates started making fun of me for drinking such inferior beer. Some of you may remember that Olympia brewery had recently purchased Hammm's and was making a marketing push in the midwest with an ad campaign that alluded to some fairy like creatures called Artesians that made Olympia so much better than whatever we used to drink. They had a slogan "it's the water". Now I being a good midwesterner grew up in the "land of sky blue waters" knew that it was the "water best for brewing" and challenged my fellow student to a bind taste testing. Actually, my cynical thesis was that as Olympia had bought up Hamm's, the beer was identical, only the packaging was different and he was paying $6 / case for the label. My room mate presided over the tasting, being from Peoria, he was a Pabst man (also $2.99 / case). Low and behold, they actually did taste different. I was successful choosing Hamm's as my beer while the Artesians also preferred Hamm's, proving my thesis wrong while proving Jim Koch correct. |
|
|||
|
|||
Craig Bergren wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 23:49:08 -0500, Alexander D. Mitchell IV wrote: > > >>Labeling, as Jim Koch can tell you, is everything. > > > How true. Back in the spring of 1978 I was sitting in my dorm room > drinking a bottle of Hamm's I purchased on sale at the low price of $ 2.99 > a case. One of my floor mates started making fun of me for drinking such > inferior beer. Some of you may remember that Olympia brewery had recently > purchased Hammm's and was making a marketing push in the midwest with an > ad campaign that alluded to some fairy like creatures called Artesians > that made Olympia so much better than whatever we used to drink. They had > a slogan "it's the water". Now I being a good midwesterner grew up in the > "land of sky blue waters" knew that it was the "water best for brewing" > and challenged my fellow student to a bind taste testing. Actually, my > cynical thesis was that as Olympia had bought up Hamm's, the beer was > identical, only the packaging was different and he was paying $6 / case > for the label. > > My room mate presided over the tasting, being from Peoria, he was a Pabst > man (also $2.99 / case). Low and behold, they actually did taste > different. I was successful choosing Hamm's as my beer while the Artesians > also preferred Hamm's, proving my thesis wrong while proving Jim Koch > correct. > > > In a non blind taste test between Coors and Bud (I don't normally drink either) I found Bud was sweeter with coarser carbonation while the Coors has a slight sour note and finer carbonation. I'd rather have the Bud flavor with the Coors carbonation But if I buy this style I buy Miller because that's what my wife will drink. I will ocassionaly buy Hamm's because that is what my Dad drank. Nels -- Nels E Satterlund I don't speak for the company, specially here <-- Use this address for personal Email My Lurkers motto: I read much better and faster, than I type. |
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 03:07:21 GMT, "Lew Bryson"
> wrote: >Pick it out as "the sucking one" in a blind tasting with Guinness, Murphy's, >and Beamish, and I'll be impressed. > Blind tasting is a great way to test your taste buds. We do it regularly with commercial beers at homebrew club meetings. You have no preconceptions of the beers or their mystiques. We usually at least know the general style or area the beers are from, but the results can still be eye opening. ----------------------------------------------------- Pete Clouston Lawrence (KS) Brewers Guild http://www.sunflower.com/~homebrew |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Popularity of the small and medium-size Adidas Porsche Design | General Cooking | |||
medium-size oranges | Baking | |||
medium-size oranges | Baking | |||
Medium, Medium Rare | General Cooking | |||
List of medium-sized and mega breweries. Adjustments appreciated. | Beer |