Cherry coal producing factoid
 

I received a truckload of cherry wood from a friend last fall
(cut and split, he is a great guy!) and decided to use some this
past weekend. I've used cherry before for flavor, mixing in oak
for and lump for heat, but this is the first time I decided to
use cherry and lump only. It was a real struggle to keep the
Klose up to temp with just cherry logs. I was feeding a log
into to the fire chamber every 30 minutes, twice as often as
with oak or hickory.

I will continue to use cherry for flavoring, but will supliment
it with oak or hickory for heat.

FWIW

--
George B. Ross is
remove the obvious bits for email
Why is it that being a good boy and being good at being
a boy don't require the same set of skills? - anonymous

Cherry coal producing factoid
 

Denny Wheeler wrote:

> I'd be interested in Dave Bugg's input on this--I know he has, and
> uses, cherry wood. (along with apple, maple, and other fruitwoods;
> Wenatchee is kind of a major fruit-growing center)

Oak and hickory seem to produce higher btu than cherry and apple.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

Cherry coal producing factoid
 

George B. Ross wrote:
> I received a truckload of cherry wood from a friend last fall
> (cut and split, he is a great guy!) and decided to use some this
> past weekend. I've used cherry before for flavor, mixing in oak
> for and lump for heat, but this is the first time I decided to
> use cherry and lump only. It was a real struggle to keep the
> Klose up to temp with just cherry logs. I was feeding a log
> into to the fire chamber every 30 minutes, twice as often as
> with oak or hickory.
>
> I will continue to use cherry for flavoring, but will supliment
> it with oak or hickory for heat.
>
> FWIW
>
Hey George! Still living in Granger? Cherry isn't nearly as dense as oak
or hickory so it will burn up quicker. As far as flavor goes, I never
did find cherry by itself to be pleasant but when I mixed it with oak it
was a very good combo.

--
Regards,

Piedmont

The Practical Bar-B-Q'r at: http://web.infoave.net/~amwil/Index.htm

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless,
whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism
or the holy name of liberty or democracy?

Mahatma Gandhi, "Non-Violence in Peace and War"

Cherry coal producing factoid
 

Mike "Piedmont" ) opined:

> George B. Ross wrote:
>> I received a truckload of cherry wood from a friend last
>> fall (cut and split, he is a great guy!) and decided to
>> use some this past weekend. I've used cherry before for
>> flavor, mixing in oak for and lump for heat, but this is
>> the first time I decided to use cherry and lump only. It
>> was a real struggle to keep the Klose up to temp with just
>> cherry logs. I was feeding a log into to the fire chamber
>> every 30 minutes, twice as often as with oak or hickory.
>>
>> I will continue to use cherry for flavoring, but will
>> supliment it with oak or hickory for heat.
>>
>> FWIW
>>
> Hey George! Still living in Granger? Cherry isn't nearly as
> dense as oak or hickory so it will burn up quicker. As far
> as flavor goes, I never did find cherry by itself to be
> pleasant but when I mixed it with oak it was a very good
> combo.
>

In Mishawaka, not far off!

After a bit of digging, found some BTU info for various woods:

BTU/Cord
Hickory, Shagbark: 27,500
Apple: 27,000
Maple: 25,500
Oak, Red: 24,600
Cherry, Black: 20,400

with all but apple listed as "Excellent" coal producing and it
was "Good".

--
George B. Ross is
remove the obvious bits for email
Why is it that being a good boy and being good at being
a boy don't require the same set of skills? - anonymous

Cherry coal producing factoid
 

> In Mishawaka, not far off!

The farm is on M-140 south of Watervliet, just in case you were
interested. <g> Someone tore up a field of apples, too. It's a shame to
see those burned in huge piles.

-John O

Cherry coal producing factoid
 

"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message
...
> Denny Wheeler wrote:
>
>> I'd be interested in Dave Bugg's input on this--I know he has, and
>> uses, cherry wood. (along with apple, maple, and other fruitwoods;
>> Wenatchee is kind of a major fruit-growing center)
>
> Oak and hickory seem to produce higher btu than cherry and apple.
>
> --
> Dave
> www.davebbq.com




Higher Btu? Does that mean you get more heat from them than the Btu's on
the bottom? ;)


In wood, you can usually translate the weight of the wood to a given number
of Btu. Most cases, that is about 7,000 per pound. Dryness and density are
the factors here. Cherry, although a hardwood, is not as dense as oak or
hickory, thus a given sized log will produce less heat than the others of
the same size. One can work as well as the other, you just have to feed
more volume for the same heat output.
http://mb-soft.com/juca/print/firewood.html

Cherry coal producing factoid
 

Edwin Pawlowski wrote:

> In wood, you can usually translate the weight of the wood to a given
> number of Btu. Most cases, that is about 7,000 per pound. Dryness
> and density are the factors here. Cherry, although a hardwood, is
> not as dense as oak or hickory, thus a given sized log will produce
> less heat than the others of the same size. One can work as well
> as the other, you just have to feed more volume for the same heat
> output. http://mb-soft.com/juca/print/firewood.html

That's, uhhh, that's what I meant.... ummm.... yeah. Thanks for the info.,
Ed.
--
Dave
www.davebbq.com