 |
|
| Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
Finally replaced my Weber Kettle
Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents
cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. Yesterday, a grill full of brats and chorizos fell to the ground (freshly mown grass) when the apparatus I was using finally collapsed. It consisted of an old Weber Kettle that had 3 rusty holes in the bottom where the legs had long ago been attached. Inside the kettle was a grate with some lava rocks. This sat atop a rusty old Meco bullet smoker in which I'd build my wood fires. I'd been using this for several years, and had posted about it on a.f.barbecue back in March of 2000. It worked great for doing sausages, pork and chicken since I could get it hot w/o direct flames on the meat, due to the lava rocks, and for steaks and burgers I could put a bit of hickory bark on top of the lava rocks to sear, and the bark would then burn away, so no more intense flames for the remainder of the grilling, which with steaks never lasted much longer anyway. One of the legs on the smoker collapsed. I finished the above mentioned sausages on the Weber, placed atop 3 concrete blocks. The old Weber is now going out to the creek, to be hidden in the nearby woody area, as it still has some utility left, but it doesn't look much like it does, so I doubt that the local yokels would take it if they came across it. Oh, I don't know if any of you have ever had the experience of washing fresh grass clippings off a natural casing sausage. It was quite a project. They don't just rinse right off. So, now I join the ranks of the civilized with my brand new Weber, but I'm going to miss that old thing. Also, over Labor Day weekend we were out at the creek and I grilled some Johnsonville Hot & Spicy brats over oak coals and shagbark bark. I almost never buy Johnsonvilles because they are usually so much more expensive than the store-made brats from a local supermarket (Schnuck's), which are really good, but I was on the road and a small town grocery had them for $3.50/19oz. pkg. Johnsonville's Hot & Spicy brats rock! They're not very "hot," but the flavor is outstanding. --Bryan |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Bugg wrote: > wrote: > > Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents > > cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. > > Well, Bryan, let the christening begin :-) > -- And I solemnly promise to never let a drop of naptha come near it. > > Dave > www.davebbq.com --Bryan |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pan paniscus wrote:
> And I solemnly promise to never let a drop of naptha come near it. ROTFLOL!!!! -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > On 8 Sep 2005 15:50:56 -0700, wrote: > > >Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents > >cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. > > <snip one loooooong paragraph too painful to read> > > You ought to save up some money and get a full-blown keyboard, one > with a big, fat ENTER key. Should I also make sure to organize posts into paragraphs that begin with a topic sentence, elaborate on that theme in the body, then close with one nice summation that ties everything together logically, and leaves all readers with a smile and a nod of the head that says, "Boy, that guy sure knows how to construct a paragraph."? You know, no one forces you to read posts, and since there's no shortage of bandwidth, like in the old days. What's also funny is that in this thread a fellow progressive is giving me a bunch of crap, while a Right-winger is joking around with me. http://stlpunk.com/thebonobos http://myspace.com/thebonobos I'm one of the good guys. --Bryan |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Bugg wrote: > Pan paniscus wrote: > > > And I solemnly promise to never let a drop of naptha come near it. > > ROTFLOL!!!! > -- It really isn't funny. That shit's nasty, and I don't for a minute believe that it all burns off. Any civilized person uses a chimney or an electric starter, or SOMETHING other than squirting petroleum distillate into a thing that one uses to make FOOD. The shit shouldn't even be legal because it's dangerous and the kind of pig who would get that shit around his/her food is just the kind of idiot who'd be stupid enough to use it in ways not recommended on the can/bottle. I don't insult people for using charcoal, even briquets. I even usually keep a bag on hand for situations like rain, even though otherwise pretty strict about using only wood--luckily my sister has lots of shagbark hickory trees, and I have 4 cherry, 1 peach and 1 pear tree in my back yard--but using lighter fluid is like wiping your ass on your grill. > > Dave > www.davebbq.com --Bryan |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matthew L. Martin wrote: > wrote: > > Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > > > >>On 8 Sep 2005 15:50:56 -0700, wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents > >>>cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. > >> > >><snip one loooooong paragraph too painful to read> > >> > >>You ought to save up some money and get a full-blown keyboard, one > >>with a big, fat ENTER key. > > > > > > Should I also make sure to organize posts into paragraphs that begin > > with a topic sentence, elaborate on that theme in the body, then close > > with one nice summation that ties everything together logically, and > > leaves all readers with a smile and a nod of the head that says, "Boy, > > that guy sure knows how to construct a paragraph."? > > Well, in my case, I'd read it if you did that. I didn't read the > original post. If that doesn't matter to you it doesn't matter to me. Since we're getting picky, you omitted the word, "have," in first sentence of the above paragraph. Ideally, you should have worded it thusly, "I'd have read it had you'd done that," or, "I'd have read it if you'd done that." The way you wrote it would only be correct if you were suggesting that you would accede to read it if I were to revise the OP in a way that made it more attractive to you. Is that what you're suggesting? > > > You know, no one forces you to read posts, and since there's no > > shortage of bandwidth, like in the old days. > > He was asking you to make your post longer, not shorter. What I meant was, the fact that he downloaded a post that he then deemed unworthy of reading might have wasted a few seconds of his time, but that was the extent of the harm. > > > What's also funny is that in this thread a fellow progressive is giving > > me a bunch of crap, while a Right-winger is joking around with me. > > http://stlpunk.com/thebonobos > > http://myspace.com/thebonobos > > I'm one of the good guys. > > Be that as it may, more people will read a well organized post than a > solid block of letters. My post was far from "a solid block of letters." It had both spaces between the words, and punctuation marks. > That's one of the many reasons that publishers employ editors. What's funny about your reply is that in my real life I have occasionally moonlighted as a copy editor. I thought that my standards for writing exceeded the rather loose norms of Usenet. Should I also indent at the beginning of new paragraphs, or perhaps skip a linespace? > > Matthew --Bryan |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pan paniscus wrote:
> It really isn't funny. That shit's nasty, and I don't for a minute > believe that it all burns off. That's what most of us in AFB have been telling newbies for years. The laughter was in agreement. :-) -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > > On 8 Sep 2005 15:50:56 -0700, wrote: > > > > >Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents > > >cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. > > > > <snip one loooooong paragraph too painful to read> > > > > You ought to save up some money and get a full-blown keyboard, one > > with a big, fat ENTER key. > > Should I also make sure to organize posts into paragraphs that begin > with a topic sentence, elaborate on that theme in the body, then close > with one nice summation that ties everything together logically, and > leaves all readers with a smile and a nod of the head that says, "Boy, > that guy sure knows how to construct a paragraph."? > > You know, no one forces you to read posts, and since there's no > shortage of bandwidth, like in the old days. > > What's also funny is that in this thread a fellow progressive is giving > me a bunch of crap, while a Right-winger is joking around with me. > http://stlpunk.com/thebonobos > http://myspace.com/thebonobos > I'm one of the good guys. > It's not one's politics that decides how one will be responded to, it's how one acquits oneself in reply to compliments and digs; for the proud shall be brought down and the humble raised up. I read that somewhere a while back. Welcome to the mixed bag, "CLASSACT"! Now I have to figure out if I'm a progressive, a Right-winger, a Libertarian, FAQ nihil (?) or sumpin else. -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pan paniscus" > wrote:
> Dave Bugg wrote: > > Pan paniscus wrote: > > > > > And I solemnly promise to never let a drop of naptha come near it. > > > > ROTFLOL!!!! > > It really isn't funny. That shit's nasty, and I don't for a minute > believe that it all burns off. Any civilized person uses a chimney or > an electric starter, or SOMETHING other than squirting petroleum > distillate into a thing that one uses to make FOOD. The shit shouldn't > even be legal because it's dangerous and the kind of pig who would get > that shit around his/her food is just the kind of idiot who'd be stupid > enough to use it in ways not recommended on the can/bottle. > I don't insult people for using charcoal, even briquets. I even > usually keep a bag on hand for situations like rain, even though > otherwise pretty strict about using only wood--luckily my sister has > lots of shagbark hickory trees, and I have 4 cherry, 1 peach and 1 pear > tree in my back yard--but using lighter fluid is like wiping your ass > on your grill. > > I use Jack Daniels to light the lump in my chimney, but I won't drink it! -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
> Matthew L. Martin wrote: > > wrote: > > > Kevin S. Wilson wrote:[who cares?] > > Well, in my case, I'd read it if you did that. I didn't read the > > original post. If that doesn't matter to you it doesn't matter to me. > > Since we're getting picky, you omitted the word, "have," in first > sentence of the above paragraph. Ideally, you should have worded it > thusly, "I'd have read it had you'd done that," or, "I'd have read it > if you'd done that." The way you wrote it would only be correct if you > were suggesting that you would accede to read it if I were to revise > the OP in a way that made it more attractive to you. Is that what > you're suggesting? > > > > > You know, no one forces you to read posts, and since there's no > > > shortage of bandwidth, like in the old days. > > > > He was asking you to make your post longer, not shorter. > > What I meant was, the fact that he downloaded a post that he then > deemed unworthy of reading might have wasted a few seconds of his time, > but that was the extent of the harm. > > > > > What's also funny is that in this thread a fellow progressive is > > > giving me a bunch of crap, while a Right-winger is joking around with > > > me. http://stlpunk.com/thebonobos > > > http://myspace.com/thebonobos > > > I'm one of the good guys. > > > > Be that as it may, more people will read a well organized post than a > > solid block of letters. > > My post was far from "a solid block of letters." It had both spaces > between the words, and punctuation marks. > > > That's one of the many reasons that publishers employ editors. > > What's funny about your reply is that in my real life I have > occasionally moonlighted as a copy editor. I thought that my standards > for writing exceeded the rather loose norms of Usenet. Should I also > indent at the beginning of new paragraphs, or perhaps skip a linespace? > > Bryan, do yourself a favor. Don't get caught up in these picayune matters. Thanks for not x-posting, BTW. -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> wrote: > > > ... Now I have to figure out if I'm > > a progressive, a Right-winger, a Libertarian, FAQ nihil (?) or sumpin > > else. > > Oh, Oh, I pick .....sumpin else. Definitely. Nick is sumpin else :-) 'Tweren't a contest, dagnabit! ;-/ -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> wrote: > > > 'Tweren't a contest, dagnabit! ;-/ > > Shucks, I was hopin' I'd win sumpin' Oh, OK. Watch yer USPS. ;-) -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
> Matthew L. Martin wrote: > wrote: >> >>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On 8 Sep 2005 15:50:56 -0700, wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents >>>>>cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. >>>> >>>><snip one loooooong paragraph too painful to read> >>>> >>>>You ought to save up some money and get a full-blown keyboard, one >>>>with a big, fat ENTER key. >>> >>> >>>Should I also make sure to organize posts into paragraphs that begin >>>with a topic sentence, elaborate on that theme in the body, then close >>>with one nice summation that ties everything together logically, and >>>leaves all readers with a smile and a nod of the head that says, "Boy, >>>that guy sure knows how to construct a paragraph."? >> >>Well, in my case, I'd read it if you did that. I didn't read the >>original post. If that doesn't matter to you it doesn't matter to me. > > > Since we're getting picky, you omitted the word, "have," in first > sentence of the above paragraph. Ideally, you should have worded it > thusly, "I'd have read it had you'd done that," or, "I'd have read it > if you'd done that." The way you wrote it would only be correct if you > were suggesting that you would accede to read it if I were to revise > the OP in a way that made it more attractive to you. Is that what > you're suggesting? Close enough. If you care to repost it with improved style, I would read it, as I read most of the posts to this ng. I simply don't try to read 40 lines of uninterrupted text. >>>You know, no one forces you to read posts, and since there's no >>>shortage of bandwidth, like in the old days. >> >>He was asking you to make your post longer, not shorter. > > > What I meant was, the fact that he downloaded a post that he then > deemed unworthy of reading might have wasted a few seconds of his time, > but that was the extent of the harm. > >>>What's also funny is that in this thread a fellow progressive is giving >>>me a bunch of crap, while a Right-winger is joking around with me. >>>http://stlpunk.com/thebonobos >>>http://myspace.com/thebonobos >>>I'm one of the good guys. >> >>Be that as it may, more people will read a well organized post than a >>solid block of letters. > > > My post was far from "a solid block of letters." It had both spaces > between the words, and punctuation marks. Are you really going to defend absence of paragraphs while nit picking grammar. >>That's one of the many reasons that publishers employ editors. > > > What's funny about your reply is that in my real life I have > occasionally moonlighted as a copy editor. I thought that my standards > for writing exceeded the rather loose norms of Usenet. Should I also > indent at the beginning of new paragraphs, or perhaps skip a linespace? The method I see most commonly, is line blocked paragraphs. Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer people will read what you write, neither do I. -- Matthew "All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people" -- Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936) |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8 Sep 2005 16:45:48 -0700, wrote:
> >Kevin S. Wilson wrote: >> On 8 Sep 2005 15:50:56 -0700, wrote: >> >> >Checked the prices at WalMart and Lowe's, and WalMart was 37 cents >> >cheaper, so Lowe's gave me the WalMart price minus 10%. >> >> <snip one loooooong paragraph too painful to read> >> >> You ought to save up some money and get a full-blown keyboard, one >> with a big, fat ENTER key. > >Should I also make sure to organize posts into paragraphs that begin >with a topic sentence, elaborate on that theme in the body, then close >with one nice summation that ties everything together logically, and >leaves all readers with a smile and a nod of the head that says, "Boy, >that guy sure knows how to construct a paragraph."? <shrug> Depend on whether you want your posts to be read, or skipped over. I'm certainly not going to plow through a single paragraph consisting of over 100 lines just to find out if there's something of value in all that bunched-up text. The real question is, "Why would you want to make reading your prose any more difficult than it need be? >You know, no one forces you to read posts, and since there's no >shortage of bandwidth, like in the old days. > >What's also funny is that in this thread a fellow progressive is giving >me a bunch of crap, while a Right-winger is joking around with me. >http://stlpunk.com/thebonobos >http://myspace.com/thebonobos >I'm one of the good guys. > No one said you weren't. I merely suggested that you might want to format you posts so they're more accessible. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matthew L. Martin wrote: > Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer > people will read what you write, neither do I. Funny. I must just be an intolerant SOB because I just KF'd the original poster for X-posting. <g> I'm gettin' crochety in my old age I guess. -- The High Honorable Reverend Fosco Gamgee Wooaaa.... hahaa... Whitfurrows and his 6" stoner --Weddings performed for a nominal fee. --Beer or magic shrooms accepted in lieu of cash payment ROFL! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
F.G. Whitfurrows wrote: > Matthew L. Martin wrote: > > Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer > > people will read what you write, neither do I. > > Funny. I must just be an intolerant SOB because I just KF'd the original > poster for X-posting. <g> Mr. Whitfurrows never learned about asking nicely first being far more effective. As long as my post to any group is even tangentially related to BBQ, I'll make Goddamned SURE to X-post here, and there's really nothing wrong with that. People who think they own unmoderated NGs just because they are established regulars are full of crap. > > I'm gettin' crochety in my old age I guess. > I do SO hate it when crochety old farts killfile me, almost as much as when loser punk rockers do. Oh, and that lipstick ******* on that one group. Perhaps I should start posting heavily on a.f.barbecue to compensate for the bitter old men who know they're not long for this world, and who also know that they'll never again get to **** any real hotties unless they pay for it. I guess all there is left is gumming BBQ pork off of rib bones, and getting all in a huff when someone posts in any way that varies from your prissy little Netiquette. --Bryan http://myspace.com/thebonobos |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"F.G. Whitfurrows" > wrote:
> Matthew L. Martin wrote: > > Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer > > people will read what you write, neither do I. > > Funny. I must just be an intolerant SOB because I just KF'd the original > poster for X-posting. <g> > > I'm gettin' crochety in my old age I guess. But it sure does make the neighborhood more pleasant, you intolerant SOB! -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
> [blahblah blah blah blah snipped] Well CLASSACTINYOUROWNMIND, I held my crotchety old hand for a bit, but, as the walrus said: PLONK! AMF -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"F.G. Whitfurrows" > wrote:
> wrote: > > [whatever he wrote . . . who cares] > I don't really know how those guys'll feel about it if you do post > heavily here, but I know that I won't give a good goddamn about it > because I won't see any of it anyway. As for hotties...(thats what you > young'n's are callin' girls now, huh?)... well Poindexter, you're the one > hittin' up on *******s over the internet. > You have a lot more patience than me, Hobbit. I just wanted to paddle him. -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
> wrote in message ups.com... > > F.G. Whitfurrows wrote: >> Matthew L. Martin wrote: >> > Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer >> > people will read what you write, neither do I. >> >> Funny. I must just be an intolerant SOB because I just KF'd the original >> poster for X-posting. <g> > > Mr. Whitfurrows never learned about asking nicely first being far more > effective. > As long as my post to any group is even tangentially related to BBQ, > I'll make Goddamned SURE to X-post here, and there's really nothing > wrong with that. People who think they own unmoderated NGs just > because they are established regulars are full of crap. >> >> I'm gettin' crochety in my old age I guess. >> > I do SO hate it when crochety old farts killfile me, almost as much as > when loser punk rockers do. Oh, and that lipstick ******* on that one > group. > > Perhaps I should start posting heavily on a.f.barbecue to compensate > for the bitter old men who know they're not long for this world, and > who also know that they'll never again get to **** any real hotties > unless they pay for it. I guess all there is left is gumming BBQ pork > off of rib bones, and getting all in a huff when someone posts in any > way that varies from your prissy little Netiquette. > > --Bryan http://myspace.com/thebonobos > Well said. Ken |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is what x-posting brings to the table. -- The High Honorable Reverend Fosco Gamgee Wooaaa.... hahaa... Whitfurrows and his 6" stoner --Weddings performed for a nominal fee. --Beer or magic shrooms accepted in lieu of cash payment ROFL! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
> wrote > I use Jack Daniels to light the lump in my chimney, but I won't drink it! A might persnickety ain't ya? I won't buy it, but I'll drink all you'll pour down my throat. Must be a Kalifornia thang. <G> TFM® |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in > <snip one loooooong paragraph too painful to read> > > You ought to save up some money and get a full-blown keyboard, one > with a big, fat ENTER key. > Listen up. Kevvie is the man when it comes to big fat things entering. TFM® (I ****ed my sock puppet in the ass) |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"NapalmHeart" > wrote:
> [pfft snipped] > Well said. > Can I blame Kevvie for bringing this termite out of the woodpile, too? -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"TFM®" > wrote:
> > wrote > > > I use Jack Daniels to light the lump in my chimney, but I won't drink > > it! > > A might persnickety ain't ya? > > I won't buy it, but I'll drink all you'll pour down my throat. > > Must be a Kalifornia thang. <G> > Sure, at that price, I'll drink anything except Jagermeister and Ouzo. Well, if that's all there was, maybe. -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
> wrote > F.G. Whitfurrows wrote: > > Matthew L. Martin wrote: > > > Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer > > > people will read what you write, neither do I. > > > > Funny. I must just be an intolerant SOB because I just KF'd the original > > poster for X-posting. <g> > > Mr. Whitfurrows never learned about asking nicely first being far more > effective. Hey, you watch your Goddamned mother ****ing mouth! He's a mother ****ing preacher Goddammit! He married me and my wife. > As long as my post to any group is even tangentially related to BBQ, > I'll make Goddamned SURE to X-post here, and there's really nothing > wrong with that. Nothing as long as you don't mind getting your ass whipped all over creation.........then killfiled. Did I mention that you need to watch your Goddamn ****ing language? > > I'm gettin' crochety in my old age I guess. > > > I do SO hate it when crochety old farts killfile me, almost as much as > when loser punk rockers do. Oh, and that lipstick ******* on that one > group. > > Perhaps I should start posting heavily on a.f.barbecue to compensate > for the bitter old men who know they're not long for this world, and > who also know that they'll never again get to **** any real hotties > unless they pay for it. **** yeah! Bring it on bitch. Been a long time since I had any real fun. I guess all there is left is gumming BBQ pork > off of rib bones, and getting all in a huff when someone posts in any > way that varies from your prissy little Netiquette. > > --Bryan http://myspace.com/thebonobos > Didn't you call yourself somethingelse a few years back? Seems I remember the bonobos website. You used to push a particular MP3 *AND* you used to be a decent person. Methamphatime get to you? TFM® |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"TFM®" > wrote:
> > wrote > > > I use Jack Daniels to light the lump in my chimney, but I won't drink > > it! > > A might persnickety ain't ya? > > I won't buy it, but I'll drink all you'll pour down my throat. > > Must be a Kalifornia thang. <G> > Goddamn it, you dumb****! You x-posted to that a.punk pit and sucked me into doin' the same dumb**** thing! Goddamn it! -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
TFM® wrote:
> > wrote > >>I use Jack Daniels to light the lump in my chimney, but I won't drink it! > > A might persnickety ain't ya? > > I won't buy it, but I'll drink all you'll pour down my throat. > > Must be a Kalifornia thang. <G> In 20+ years of living in The People's Republic of California I've never once seen anyone actually drink it, and I do my share of group drinking. It's mainly a BBQ sauce ingredient here. -- Reg email: RegForte (at) (that free MS email service) (dot) com |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
> wrote
>I won't buy it, but I'll drink all you'll pour down my throat. Well, I live in Missouri, and I can get Jack Daniels for $32 for the big 1.75 Liter bottle. I like it with coke, and I like the wood chips they make, too. Heck, maybe next time I smoke, I'll just put some Jack 'n' Coke into the water pan. EZ Larry from St. Louis |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
> F.G. Whitfurrows wrote: > >>Matthew L. Martin wrote: >> >>>Post to please yourself. As I said, if you don't mind that fewer >>>people will read what you write, neither do I. >> >>Funny. I must just be an intolerant SOB because I just KF'd the original >>poster for X-posting. <g> > > > Mr. Whitfurrows never learned about asking nicely first being far more > effective. > As long as my post to any group is even tangentially related to BBQ, > I'll make Goddamned SURE to X-post here, and there's really nothing > wrong with that. People who think they own unmoderated NGs just > because they are established regulars are full of crap. > >>I'm gettin' crochety in my old age I guess. >> > > I do SO hate it when crochety old farts killfile me, almost as much as > when loser punk rockers do. Oh, and that lipstick ******* on that one > group. > > Perhaps I should start posting heavily on a.f.barbecue to compensate > for the bitter old men who know they're not long for this world, and > who also know that they'll never again get to **** any real hotties > unless they pay for it. I guess all there is left is gumming BBQ pork > off of rib bones, and getting all in a huff when someone posts in any > way that varies from your prissy little Netiquette. I'm not a fan of Jacl either. A vastly over-rated whiskey. Wild Turkey (had something called Wild Turkey 101 once that was damn good) or Old Gandad's mush nicer. Sure hope this didn't **** any a.f.b'ers off  -- Andrew @ Rockface www.rockface-records.co.uk |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:32:13 GMT, "TFM®" >
wrote: >TFM® (I ****ed my sock puppet in the ass) Dibs on the .sig file. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Andrew @ Rockface" > wrote:
> [ . . . ] > I'm not a fan of Jacl either. A vastly over-rated whiskey. Wild Turkey > (had something called Wild Turkey 101 once that was damn good) or Old > Gandad's mush nicer. > > Sure hope this didn't **** any a.f.b'ers off Just the fact that ya x-posted and quoted so much of ASSACT! Except for that, I agree with ya, although my Bourbon of choice for over 50 years has been Old Forester. but Wild Turkey and Old Grandad are quite acceptable. -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Weber Kettle: Cannot keep it hot enough | Barbecue | |||
| Dobro-Q from a Weber Kettle | Barbecue | |||
| Weber Kettle vs WSM | Barbecue | |||
| Weber Kettle as a smoker | Barbecue | |||
| Turkey in a Weber kettle | General Cooking | |||
Linear Mode
