Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote: > I ignore you for months, so you create a sock puppet to get me to > reply. That's k00k sign, boy, pure and simple. Which is more scary. 1) Kevin thinks the reason I created a new profile on a machine was because of him 2) Kevin says he ignored me for months I wish I could say that YHBT in this case Kevin, but I cannot. If you note on your googling, I used the other profile *FIRST* in another newsgroup 2 weeks before I posted to ARK or AFB. sci.engr.joining.welding June 12 alt.religion.kibology June 27, 7:07 pm ***The first post to ark on the other account was in a reply to you Kevin and I signed it '-CAL'*** GIVE IT UP KEVINS, you are RONG. I anticipate more rationalization from you. So pathetic. |
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message ... "I suspect that he truly does think that, and suspect, as well, that an "America, Love It or Leave It" post isn't far off." That's the impression I've gotten all along. If I didn't know Americans in general better than what I've seen here as conservatives, I wouldn't have much of an impression at all. I was a Reagan supporter, but we should've left George Senior to rot in the bog hole he was sinking in here in Newfoundland. |
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
> You challenged me. I proved you wrong. Not hardly. All you proved is that you have no idea how the lines of emergency response from local to state to the feds work. > Are you refuting what GWB did > and said? Nope. He asked the governor of LA to do what the other governors did, but she needed 24 hours to think it over >Are you such a kneejerk dittohead that you will argue > against your own president? The only kneejerk reaction was yours. I simply responded. But then you'll pimp for the liberal side, instead of shutting up and hearing what the real facts are. >Do you really think that anyone who > disagrees with your positions is evil and traitorous? That's your balliwick. > I have come to the conclusion that you are all of those things. At > least you've gone out of your way to prove it by shitting all over > this ng. If you are going to continue being childish, go find some > other ng to do that. I was here long before you arrived, and I'll be here long after you depart. You continue to introduce these issues and then cry foul when called on your rants. You are the biggest NG shitter here. > Now to complete this political fiasco: What about taking responsibilty > for your own actions. This is how GWB's administration does that, the > try to shift the blame: You forgot to include the this link to show just how the Democrats plan to use the tragedy for their own political gain: http://www.democrats.com/node/5938 -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
D. Winsor wrote:
> That's the impression I've gotten all along. If I didn't know > Americans in general better than what I've seen here as > conservatives, I wouldn't have much of an impression at all. I was a > Reagan supporter, but we should've left George Senior to rot in the > bog hole he was sinking in here in Newfoundland. Canadians, as a whole, are good folk.... and then there's you. This link is more than enough to cover the bases: http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/ -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message ... "Canadians, as a whole, are good folk.... and then there's you. This link is more than enough to cover the bases: http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/ " Nice. From where I sit, nobody can understand, nobody's fit to opine, and you all are doing just fine down there. |
|
|||
|
|||
D. Winsor wrote:
> Nice. From where I sit, nobody can understand, nobody's fit to > opine, and you all are doing just fine down there. Whether you understand, or opine, makes not one wit of change to the situation. It solves nothing with regard to this situation. As to opining, you should have at least a rudimentary understanding of how the system is setup before you start looking for blame. Things were screwed up for a variety of reasons, and they need fixing. But this is not a political issue, it is an issue of beauracracy(sp); democrat, republican, whatever. The beauracracy kept effective response from occuring, and that must be solved. And it certainly was not a plot --- as you have stupidly suggested -- of an attempt at ignoring folks because they were black. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message ... "Whether you understand, or opine, makes not one wit of change to the situation. It solves nothing with regard to this situation. As to opining, you should have at least a rudimentary understanding of how the system is setup before you start looking for blame." Nonsense. People in trouble needed help. We had offers to help before your officials before your people were actually troubled. Bureaucrats and, God forbid, vanity kept us from your consideration. "Things were screwed up for a variety of reasons, and they need fixing." Yet your own personal arrogance kept you from admitting even that prior to now. "But this is not a political issue, it is an issue of beauracracy(sp); democrat, republican, whatever." No, the bureaucracy is a beleagured tool of the governments past and present. A general conservatism has swept accountants of both parties into power. Our own values as reflected by those accountants have left us with a dearth of leadership in these times of need. It is a very political issue in the western world because we no longer have leaders that aren't managed. "The beauracracy kept effective response from occuring, and that must be solved. And it certainly was not a plot --- as you have stupidly suggested -- of an attempt at ignoring folks because they were black." Yadah, yadah, yadah... The aims were as lily white as the hats you proport to wear. People were in trouble and needed help. It was that simple for us, but "stupid is as stupid does"... Enjoy your box of chocolates. > > -- > Dave > Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que > http://davebbq.com/ > |
|
|||
|
|||
BREATHES there the man with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said, This is my own, my native land! Whose heart hath ne'er within him burn'd, As home his footsteps he hath turn'd From wandering on a foreign strand! If such there breathe, go, mark him well; For him no Minstrel raptures swell; High though his titles, proud his name, Boundless his wealth as wish can claim; Despite those titles, power, and pelf, The wretch, concentred all in self, Living, shall forfeit fair renown, And, doubly dying, shall go down To the vile dust, from whence he sprung, Unwept, unhonored, and unsung. Sir Walter Scott -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|||
|
|||
D. Winsor wrote:
Still don't know how to properly quote, bozo. > Nonsense. People in trouble needed help. We had offers to help > before your officials before your people were actually troubled. How prescient, but please show us the proof. Your offers of help have been accepted, but your navy has yet to leave port. > Bureaucrats and, God forbid, vanity kept us from your consideration. Bureaucrats, could be. Vanity, that's a personal issue with you. > Yet your own personal arrogance kept you from admitting even that > prior to now. Oh, pleeeese. The issue was your pathetic interpretation of events, and your lack of knowledge about the limitations of federal impositions on a state. You still are as dumb as a fence-post on those issues. > No, the bureaucracy is a beleagured tool of the governments past and > present. Agreed. > A general conservatism has swept accountants of both > parties into power. Our own values as reflected by those accountants > have left us with a dearth of leadership in these times of need. It > is a very political issue in the western world because we no longer > have leaders that aren't managed. You say a lot, but there is little of substance. > Yadah, yadah, yadah... The aims were as lily white as the hats you > proport to wear. People were in trouble and needed help. People are still in trouble and getting help. And you are not the answer, you're just a hemorrohid that adds to the irritation and misery. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
D. Winsor wrote:
Oh, I almost forgot another round of wishes: http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/ To your kin as well. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Bugg wrote: > Kevin S. Wilson wrote: <sigh>You boneheads are still at it? What a pile. Suppose y'all move on with your lives? -- The High Honorable Reverend Fosco Gamgee Wooaaa.... hahaa... Whitfurrows and his 6" stoner --Weddings performed for a nominal fee. --Beer or magic shrooms accepted in lieu of cash payment ROFL! |
|
|||
|
|||
"F.G. Whitfurrows" > wrote:
> Dave Bugg wrote: > > Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > > <sigh>You boneheads are still at it? What a pile. Suppose y'all move on > with your lives? Agreed. Sad, but true. I'm disappointed to see Dave get embroiled in this. Kevin who? -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message ... "And it certainly was not a plot --- as you have stupidly suggested -- of an attempt at ignoring folks because they were black." http://www.editorandpublisher.com/ea..._id=1001054719 Hahahahahahahaha... You all are nice folk down there too. When indifference is rampant, who needs plots and conspiracies? |
|
|||
|
|||
"D. Winsor" wrote: > > "Dave Bugg" > wrote in message > ... > > "And it certainly was not a plot --- as you have stupidly suggested -- of an > attempt at ignoring folks because they were black." > > http://www.editorandpublisher.com/ea..._id=1001054719 > > Hahahahahahahaha... You all are nice folk down there too. When > indifference is rampant, who needs plots and conspiracies? Since some of them are getting food and medical assistance at the astrodome that they hadn't before, it is an accurate statement. |
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:11:05 -0700, "F.G. Whitfurrows"
> wrote: > >Dave Bugg wrote: >> Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > ><sigh>You boneheads are still at it? What a pile. Suppose y'all move on with >your lives? Bugg has no argument, so he takes a cue from spammers by posting the same thing over and over again. He's also just stupid enough to think that his childish response has the effect of silencing his critics. |
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:31:44 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >You forgot to include the this link to show just how the Democrats plan to >use the tragedy for their own political gain: >http://www.democrats.com/node/5938 Jumping Jeebus, Bugg. Just how dumb do you think folks are? Do you really expect people to believe that some tarted-up blog speaks authoritatively for the Democratic Party? From http://www.democrats.com/about: "Democrats.com was launched at the 2000 Democratic convention by two veteran Democratic consultants, David Lytel and Bob Fertik.*Our vision was to create the leading news and community Web site for the progressive base of the Democratic Party, in order to lead the fight against the radical right and the Republican Party. We called ourselves the Aggressive Progressives." But thanks for the link to dozens and dozens of news articles refuting every point you've been trying feebly to make. Bonus points for how you've usedthe "smoking gun" you think you found -- shooting yourself squarely in the foot. |
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:35:31 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >D. Winsor wrote: > >> That's the impression I've gotten all along. If I didn't know >> Americans in general better than what I've seen here as >> conservatives, I wouldn't have much of an impression at all. I was a >> Reagan supporter, but we should've left George Senior to rot in the >> bog hole he was sinking in here in Newfoundland. > >Canadians, as a whole, are good folk.... and then there's you. This link is >more than enough to cover the bases: >http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/ Resorting to an ad hominem argument, right on schedule. What else you got, Bug? |
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:02:30 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >But this is not a political issue, it is an issue of beauracracy(sp); democrat, >republican, whatever. ************ From: "Dave Bugg" > Message-ID: > "You forgot to include the this link to show just how the Democrats plan to use the tragedy for their own political gain: http://www.democrats.com/node/5938" *************** You were saying, Bug? Off to eBay to look for a more robust irony meter. This one's b0rken. |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
> It seems that this is how Dave get his jollies. You win, Matthew. You and Kevin and the prick from "brother country" win. I give up. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
"David G." > wrote:
> wrote: > > BREATHES there the man with soul so dead, > >[ . . . ] > > Sir Walter Scott > > See Nick....I knew you was a poet :-) Afraid not, David. Just one who loves beauty of expression, whether natural, or in art, words or deeds. -- Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and their families: http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ! |
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Bugg wrote:
> Matthew L. Martin wrote: > > >>It seems that this is how Dave get his jollies. > > > You win, Matthew. You and Kevin and the prick from "brother country" win. > I give up. > If you weren't so damned sure that no one else could possibly have a valid opinion, you wouldn't get caught up in things like this. A little modesty for yourself and respect for people who think differently than you do would go a long way towards making political discussions civil. -- Matthew (over and out) "All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people" -- Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936) |
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
> If you weren't so damned sure that no one else could possibly have a > valid opinion, you wouldn't get caught up in things like this. Pot-kettle-black. And I never said that you were right, just that you won. > little modesty for yourself and respect for people who think > differently than you do would go a long way towards making political > discussions civil. There should be NO political discussions here, period. And ****-off with your sanctimonious lecture, ass-wipe. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:25:59 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Matthew L. Martin wrote: > >> If you weren't so damned sure that no one else could possibly have a >> valid opinion, you wouldn't get caught up in things like this. > >Pot-kettle-black. And I never said that you were right, just that you won. > >> little modesty for yourself and respect for people who think >> differently than you do would go a long way towards making political >> discussions civil. > >There should be NO political discussions here, period. And ****-off with >your sanctimonious lecture, ass-wipe. I guess he just isn't interested in civil discussions of any sort, Matthew. That's what listening to AM talk radio will do to you. |
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message news "There should be NO political discussions here, period. And ****-off with your sanctimonious lecture, ass-wipe." D. Winsor then spake: Sanctimonious? I think you should look that one up. While you're at it look up solipsism. Notice how I changed my response format so's yah wouldn't get confused again? Dave, You are mymy most respected opinion on barbeque here, but politically you got yourself dragged down in specifics. Politics and its workings are just like machines, you troubleshoot them from the function you wish them to perform back to the on button. Your "on" button is way to loose. |
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Bugg wrote:
> Matthew L. Martin wrote: > > >>If you weren't so damned sure that no one else could possibly have a >>valid opinion, you wouldn't get caught up in things like this. > > > Pot-kettle-black. And I never said that you were right, just that you won. Go count the number of posts you and I made to this thread. See a pattern? >>little modesty for yourself and respect for people who think >>differently than you do would go a long way towards making political >>discussions civil. > > > There should be NO political discussions here, period. And ****-off with > your sanctimonious lecture, ass-wipe. > Thanks for proving my point beyond any possible doubt. You have no respect for anyone who does not think exactly as you do. That must make your life quite difficult. I feel sorry for you that you limit yourself that way. -- Matthew "All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people" -- Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936) |
|
|||
|
|||
D. Winsor wrote:
> Dave, You are mymy most respected > opinion on barbeque here Ya know what? I could care less. You are nothing but a puss-filled bed-sore on the ass-end of life. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:25:59 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > > >>Matthew L. Martin wrote: >> >> >>>If you weren't so damned sure that no one else could possibly have a >>>valid opinion, you wouldn't get caught up in things like this. >> >>Pot-kettle-black. And I never said that you were right, just that you won. >> >> >>>little modesty for yourself and respect for people who think >>>differently than you do would go a long way towards making political >>>discussions civil. >> >>There should be NO political discussions here, period. And ****-off with >>your sanctimonious lecture, ass-wipe. > > > I guess he just isn't interested in civil discussions of any sort, > Matthew. That's what listening to AM talk radio will do to you. > That's what believing AM talk radio will do to you. -- Matthew "All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people" -- Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936) |
|
|||
|
|||
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> I guess he just isn't interested in civil discussions of any sort, > Matthew. That's what listening to AM talk radio will do to you. Ya know, Kevin, this shows what little respect you or Matthew or Canada-boy have for anyone. I gave up, told you, Matthew and "brother-country" you won, but that doesn't even satisfy your needs to keep trying to take bites. Such good sports. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message ... "Ya know, Kevin, this shows what little respect you or Matthew or Canada-boy have for anyone. I gave up, told you, Matthew and "brother-country" you won, but that doesn't even satisfy your needs to keep trying to take bites. Such good sports." Yes, you were so graceful in surrender and now you won't let it go either. Troublesome prisoners are mistreated and shot down there, eh? > > -- > Dave > Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que > http://davebbq.com/ > |
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
> Thanks for proving my point beyond any possible doubt. You have no > respect for anyone who does not think exactly as you do. That's you, Matthew. Even after I gave up, you still have to keep baiting. You've truly shown how pathetic you are. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
D. Winsor wrote:
> Yes, you were so graceful in surrender and now you won't let it go > either. Troublesome prisoners are mistreated and shot down there, eh? Keep sticking that size 8 further into your maw. Folks just love to see who you really are. -- Dave Dave's Pit-Smoked Bar-B-Que http://davebbq.com/ |
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:43:37 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > >> I guess he just isn't interested in civil discussions of any sort, >> Matthew. That's what listening to AM talk radio will do to you. > >Ya know, Kevin, this shows what little respect you or Matthew or Canada-boy >have for anyone. I gave up, told you, Matthew and "brother-country" you won, ITYM, "that prick from the 'brother country.'" Let's be accurate here, no? >but that doesn't even satisfy your needs to keep trying to take bites. Such >good sports. That wasn't the post about which I was commenting, and you know it. This hand-waving isn't getting you anywhere. Some of us are paying attention. My comment was prompted by your post that said, in part, "And ****-off with your sanctimonious lecture, ass-wipe." But you knew that already. |
|
|||
|
|||
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> But you knew that already. Are you done? |
|
|||
|
|||
The troll king criticizes a "regular" for spamming. What next?
Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:11:05 -0700, "F.G. Whitfurrows" > > wrote: > >>Dave Bugg wrote: >> >>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote: >> >><sigh>You boneheads are still at it? What a pile. Suppose y'all move on with >>your lives? > > > Bugg has no argument, so he takes a cue from spammers by posting the > same thing over and over again. He's also just stupid enough to think > that his childish response has the effect of silencing his critics. > |
|
|||
|
|||
Not a chance. These morons live for this crap.
Dave Bugg wrote: > Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > > >>But you knew that already. > > > Are you done? > > |
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Bugg wrote: > Kevin S. Wilson wrote: > >> But you knew that already. > > Are you done? *Last* *word*! Ha! See how I paced you ****ers, and then just as you were runnin' outta steam I just blew by ya at the end of the race? That how ya when an argument. Just wait for everyone else to get sick of it and then throw out the last word! "cause its the last word everyone'll remember. HA! <god I hope it really is> -- The High Honorable Reverend Fosco Gamgee Wooaaa.... hahaa... Whitfurrows and his 6" stoner --Weddings performed for a nominal fee. --Beer or magic shrooms accepted in lieu of cash payment ROFL! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|