Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
![]()
Brick wrote:
On 15-Feb-2005, "Dana H. Myers" wrote: Well, not really. I put about 3 chimney-loads of fuel in the firebox and run a grate-level temperature of 250-275 for as long 6 hours. That's less total fuel and a lot less messing around than when I didn't have the baffle in place. I haven't added the pie plate yet and I've never achieved a burn on 3 chimneys of fuel longer then two hours. That sounds like the old days for me ;-). I'm much closer to 6 hours than 2 hours with 3 chimney loads. A couple of times I've done baby-backs, taken them off around 3:30-4 hours, and noticed I still had cooking heat (225+) after 5:30 or so. It occurs to me that we ought to be a little more objective about how big a "chimney load" is. I have a Weber chimney, http://tinyurl.com/6m4q3, and I wouldn't be surprised if a heaping chimney-full is close to a gallon. The other thing I did was turn the bottom grates (the grates on which the fuel sits) 90 degrees so the fuel is held a couple of inches higher in the firebox. This seems to have improved the airflow from the damper opening quite a bit, and it probably the key to being able to get long, controllable 250F+ cook chamber temperatures. Before I turned my fire grate(s) (I bought an extra fire grate to take up the extra space created by turning the grate 90°), I had way too much trouble controlling the fire. There just wasn't enough airflow through the fuel after a short burn time. Precisely - a little ash would build up below the grate and the fire would just be cantankerous as hell. I don't know what standard you're using to decide whether your cooker is using too much fuel; I just focused on getting a healthy, controllable fire and it seems to have increased the efficiency. I use about 3 gallons of lump ( I use a 5 gallon bucket to transport lump from a 40 lb bag to the pit ) to cook ribs and butts and 5 gallons or even more to cook brisket Well, I'll measure my chimney better this week and report back, but we might be using similar amounts of fuel if my idea of a "chimney load" is close to 1 gallon. Cheers, Dana |
|
|||
![]()
I created the baffle in my NBS by taking one of those disposable rectangle
aluminum drip pans and cutting it in half. Pushed it onto the bolts that hold the firebox to the cook chamber and just added a couple of spare nuts. Directs most of the heat and airflow down under the grill area. Mark "Brick" wrote in message ... On 14-Feb-2005, "Dana H. Myers" wrote: Brick wrote: Good information Dana. I benefitted a lot from your post about the minion (like) fire. My chimney is extended down to the grill, but I have yet to stuff a pie tin in there. Don't know why I've procastinating on that. Great description of the effect the pie plate made in yours. (For those that don't understand what the pie tin, (baffle) is for, it limits the amount of direct radiant heat that gets into the cook chamber. ) The unmodified model is notoriously bad about that. I don't worry much about extending burn time much further. My pit is about ten feet from my sliding door and in direct view from inside the house. I just let it go until I see the temp starting to drop on the big NBS thermometer in the lid. Then I add about a chimney's worth of lump directly from a three gallon bucket. Most everything I cook is done in 7 hours or less. Briskets are about the only exception. They take only 8 to 9 hours. (Cooking at an indicated 250° to 275°.) Apoligies to the group for quoting the whole GD thread. As you have seen I don't have anything to offer the regulars, but he FNG's might learn some- thing. Is that an indicated 250-275 on the lid thermometer? Quote from my original post' "I just let it go until I see the temp starting to drop on the big NBS thermometer in the lid. I use one of the temperature probes of the Maverick at grate level, actually at the base of the extended chimney. The NB thermometer typically reads about 25-50F hotter than at the grate and I basically don't trust it :-). But, it doesn't really matter what you use as long as you're dialed-in with it. My experience is somewhat in conflict with Dana, 'BUT' my meat gets done several hours earlier then others experience. I've never had a cook go over 9 hours even with a brisket. This would indicate that grate temp must be much hotter then at the lid, (about 4" from the exhaust stack). Go figure. Dana's pieplate mod may well be the big difference. After thinking about how the baffle would make the fire more controllable, it occurred to me that I'm now truly measuring the cook chamber temperature with the baffle in place, and the temperature probe was being heated by radiant heat previously. So the actual cook chamber temperature might have been better than I thought it was, but my thermometer was confusing me. I suppose my thermometer can always be in direct view, since it is a remote ;-) Sounds good there, Dana It seems that Dana and I are about equally articulate which means that if you understand what we are talking about, you must be above average intelligence. The bottom line is what Dana said. If you're dialed into it, everything else doesn't matter much. The NBS has a learning curve that might run some people off. But I love mine. I get good 'Q' out of it every time. And it has a lot of cooking space. I have yet to ever use the bottom grates. Brick (Keep the shiny side up) ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|||
![]()
I created the baffle in my NBS by taking one of those disposable rectangle
aluminum drip pans and cutting it in half. Pushed it onto the bolts that hold the firebox to the cook chamber and just added a couple of spare nuts. Directs most of the heat and airflow down under the grill area. Mark "Brick" wrote in message ... On 14-Feb-2005, "Dana H. Myers" wrote: Brick wrote: Good information Dana. I benefitted a lot from your post about the minion (like) fire. My chimney is extended down to the grill, but I have yet to stuff a pie tin in there. Don't know why I've procastinating on that. Great description of the effect the pie plate made in yours. (For those that don't understand what the pie tin, (baffle) is for, it limits the amount of direct radiant heat that gets into the cook chamber. ) The unmodified model is notoriously bad about that. I don't worry much about extending burn time much further. My pit is about ten feet from my sliding door and in direct view from inside the house. I just let it go until I see the temp starting to drop on the big NBS thermometer in the lid. Then I add about a chimney's worth of lump directly from a three gallon bucket. Most everything I cook is done in 7 hours or less. Briskets are about the only exception. They take only 8 to 9 hours. (Cooking at an indicated 250° to 275°.) Apoligies to the group for quoting the whole GD thread. As you have seen I don't have anything to offer the regulars, but he FNG's might learn some- thing. Is that an indicated 250-275 on the lid thermometer? Quote from my original post' "I just let it go until I see the temp starting to drop on the big NBS thermometer in the lid. I use one of the temperature probes of the Maverick at grate level, actually at the base of the extended chimney. The NB thermometer typically reads about 25-50F hotter than at the grate and I basically don't trust it :-). But, it doesn't really matter what you use as long as you're dialed-in with it. My experience is somewhat in conflict with Dana, 'BUT' my meat gets done several hours earlier then others experience. I've never had a cook go over 9 hours even with a brisket. This would indicate that grate temp must be much hotter then at the lid, (about 4" from the exhaust stack). Go figure. Dana's pieplate mod may well be the big difference. After thinking about how the baffle would make the fire more controllable, it occurred to me that I'm now truly measuring the cook chamber temperature with the baffle in place, and the temperature probe was being heated by radiant heat previously. So the actual cook chamber temperature might have been better than I thought it was, but my thermometer was confusing me. I suppose my thermometer can always be in direct view, since it is a remote ;-) Sounds good there, Dana It seems that Dana and I are about equally articulate which means that if you understand what we are talking about, you must be above average intelligence. The bottom line is what Dana said. If you're dialed into it, everything else doesn't matter much. The NBS has a learning curve that might run some people off. But I love mine. I get good 'Q' out of it every time. And it has a lot of cooking space. I have yet to ever use the bottom grates. Brick (Keep the shiny side up) ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[OT] FB: You no longer own YOU! | General Cooking | |||
No longer unemployed. :-) | General Cooking | |||
Longer Life? | Vegan | |||
Products you can no longer buy....... | Recipes | |||
Bulk Age longer? | Winemaking |