Rules for Adult Discussion
 

"Antonio Veranos" > wrote

> http://atheismresource.com/wp-conten...low-Chart1.jpg

I cannot believe you, of all people, are the one to post this.
What a hypochondriac you are!

--Tedward

Rules for Adult Discussion
 

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:43:15 -0500, The Undead Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>"Antonio Veranos" > wrote
>> http://atheismresource.com/wp-conten...low-Chart1.jpg

The author seems to be under the misapprehension that the only things
people ever discuss are rational subjects of debate, or at least that
such things make for interesting discussion.

¬R Blood is worthless, outside its original container.
http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/davidcar.html --Don Rauf

Rules for Adult Discussion
 

On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:50:51 -0500, Glenn Knickerbocker
> wrote:

>On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:43:15 -0500, The Undead Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>"Antonio Veranos" > wrote
>>> http://atheismresource.com/wp-conten...low-Chart1.jpg
>
>The author seems to be under the misapprehension that the only things
>people ever discuss are rational subjects of debate, or at least that
>such things make for interesting discussion.
>
The author also seems to be under the misapprehension that rational
discussions should proceed on a point by point basis and that if one
argument is shown to be faulty the whole thesis collapses.

That assumes that the thesis is strictly logically coherent in the first
place. This is not always the case. The propounder of the thesis might
be mistaken in relying on an argument that is later shown to be faulty.


>¬R Blood is worthless, outside its original container.
>http://users.bestweb.net/~notr/davidcar.html --Don Rauf

--
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)