Put a 13-pound brisket on the K5 at 9:00 Wednesday night. Pulled it at
12:30 Thursday afternoon when it reach 197 degrees. Double wrapped it
in heavy-duty foil, wrapped that package in a bath towel, and placed
it inside a soft-sided insulated cooler. The cooler is one of those
square jobs about 16" wide and 16" tall.

Dinner was at 7:00 PM, and the brisket was tender, juicy, flavorful,
and at a perfect temp for carving and serving.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"When you can't do something completely impractical and intrinsically
useless *yourself*, you go get the Kibologists to do it for you." --J. Furr

In article >, Kevin S.
Wilson > wrote:

> Put a 13-pound brisket on the K5 at 9:00 Wednesday night. Pulled it at
> 12:30 Thursday afternoon when it reach 197 degrees. Double wrapped it
> in heavy-duty foil, wrapped that package in a bath towel, and placed
> it inside a soft-sided insulated cooler. The cooler is one of those
> square jobs about 16" wide and 16" tall.
>
> Dinner was at 7:00 PM, and the brisket was tender, juicy, flavorful,
> and at a perfect temp for carving and serving.

Sounds like my last one.

Put on at 6:00 pm Saturday, pulled at 9:30 am Sunday (internal temp
about 180F), double-wrapped, towelled, put in a cooler.

Slicing commenced at 5:00 pm Sunday. Well, the point got sliced -- the
flat collapsed under the knife, so I was forced to chop it. Sliced
brisket for supper, sammiches all week! :-)

Kevin

In article >, Kevin S.
Wilson > wrote:

> Put a 13-pound brisket on the K5 at 9:00 Wednesday night. Pulled it at
> 12:30 Thursday afternoon when it reach 197 degrees. Double wrapped it
> in heavy-duty foil, wrapped that package in a bath towel, and placed
> it inside a soft-sided insulated cooler. The cooler is one of those
> square jobs about 16" wide and 16" tall.
>
> Dinner was at 7:00 PM, and the brisket was tender, juicy, flavorful,
> and at a perfect temp for carving and serving.

Sounds like my last one.

Put on at 6:00 pm Saturday, pulled at 9:30 am Sunday (internal temp
about 180F), double-wrapped, towelled, put in a cooler.

Slicing commenced at 5:00 pm Sunday. Well, the point got sliced -- the
flat collapsed under the knife, so I was forced to chop it. Sliced
brisket for supper, sammiches all week! :-)

Kevin

Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
Cheers,
Kent

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
>
> Put a 13-pound brisket on the K5 at 9:00 Wednesday night. Pulled it at
> 12:30 Thursday afternoon when it reach 197 degrees. Double wrapped it
> in heavy-duty foil, wrapped that package in a bath towel, and placed
> it inside a soft-sided insulated cooler. The cooler is one of those
> square jobs about 16" wide and 16" tall.
>
> Dinner was at 7:00 PM, and the brisket was tender, juicy, flavorful,
> and at a perfect temp for carving and serving.
>
> --
> Kevin S. Wilson
> Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
> "When you can't do something completely impractical and intrinsically
> useless *yourself*, you go get the Kibologists to do it for you." --J. Furr

Kent H. wrote:

> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?

I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
were not meat.

Matthew

Kent H. wrote:

> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?

I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
were not meat.

Matthew

"Matthew L. Martin" wrote:
>
> Kent H. wrote:
>
> > Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
> > in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>
> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
> I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
> were not meat.
>
> Matthew


His remarks parallel those of someone that has never done bbq and is
only aware of temps as they equate to classical cooking techniques.


-CAL

"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
...
> Kent H. wrote:
>
>> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>
> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket. I've
> cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they were
> not meat.
>
> Matthew

So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.

Jack Curry

"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
...
> Kent H. wrote:
>
>> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>
> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket. I've
> cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they were
> not meat.
>
> Matthew

So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.

Jack Curry

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:52:54 GMT, cl > wrote:

>
>
>"Matthew L. Martin" wrote:
>>
>> Kent H. wrote:
>>
>> > Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>> > in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>>
>> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
>> I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
>> were not meat.
>>
>> Matthew
>
>
>His remarks parallel those of someone that has never done bbq and is
>only aware of temps as they equate to classical cooking techniques.
>
>
You are giving him far too much credit.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:52:54 GMT, cl > wrote:

>
>
>"Matthew L. Martin" wrote:
>>
>> Kent H. wrote:
>>
>> > Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>> > in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>>
>> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
>> I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
>> were not meat.
>>
>> Matthew
>
>
>His remarks parallel those of someone that has never done bbq and is
>only aware of temps as they equate to classical cooking techniques.
>
>
You are giving him far too much credit.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:02:29 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> wrote:

>Kent H. wrote:
>
>> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>
>I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
>I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
>were not meat.
>
An idiot has already implied that he wouldn't know it was meat.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:02:29 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> wrote:

>Kent H. wrote:
>
>> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>
>I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
>I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
>were not meat.
>
An idiot has already implied that he wouldn't know it was meat.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:23:46 -0400, "Jack Curry" <Jack-CurryRemove
> wrote:

>"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
...
>> Kent H. wrote:
>>
>>> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>>> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>>
>> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket. I've
>> cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they were
>> not meat.
>>
>> Matthew
>
>So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
>retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.
>
Thereby giving Kent the attention he so obviously craves. I mean, why
else would anyone go to the trouble of posting such an obviously
ridiculous and utterly uninformed statement? Why would someone
purposely act stupid in public that way, unless they craved attention?

Wait a minute. A guy named Occam just stopped by to suggest an
alternative explanation. He says that maybe Kent really is that dumb.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:23:46 -0400, "Jack Curry" <Jack-CurryRemove
> wrote:

>"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
...
>> Kent H. wrote:
>>
>>> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>>> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>>
>> I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket. I've
>> cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they were
>> not meat.
>>
>> Matthew
>
>So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
>retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.
>
Thereby giving Kent the attention he so obviously craves. I mean, why
else would anyone go to the trouble of posting such an obviously
ridiculous and utterly uninformed statement? Why would someone
purposely act stupid in public that way, unless they craved attention?

Wait a minute. A guy named Occam just stopped by to suggest an
alternative explanation. He says that maybe Kent really is that dumb.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

Jack Curry wrote:

>
> So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
> retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.
>
> Jack Curry


I wish the best for the fellow in his time of need, but Jack he isn't
that funny. He is more on par with the humor my 6 yr old niece would
have considered funny last year.

-CAL

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:02:29 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Kent H. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>>>in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>>
>>I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
>>I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
>>were not meat.
>>
>
> An idiot has already implied that he wouldn't know it was meat.

I thought I said that.

Matthew

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:02:29 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Kent H. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
>>>in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?
>>
>>I guess this means you've never had good pulled pork or BBQ brisket.
>>I've cooked both to that temperature and only an idiot would think they
>>were not meat.
>>
>
> An idiot has already implied that he wouldn't know it was meat.

I thought I said that.

Matthew

"cl" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Jack Curry wrote:
>
> >
> > So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
> > retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.
> >
> > Jack Curry
>
>
> I wish the best for the fellow in his time of need, but Jack he isn't
> that funny. He is more on par with the humor my 6 yr old niece would
> have considered funny last year.
>
> -CAL

Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
there may be some hope for your family.
Jack

"cl" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Jack Curry wrote:
>
> >
> > So sorry that Monroe isn't here to provide one of his hilariously funny
> > retorts to the dumbest guy who has ever posted here.
> >
> > Jack Curry
>
>
> I wish the best for the fellow in his time of need, but Jack he isn't
> that funny. He is more on par with the humor my 6 yr old niece would
> have considered funny last year.
>
> -CAL

Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
there may be some hope for your family.
Jack

"Kent H." > wrote in message >...
> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?

When you burn the hell out of one of your steaks,
how do you tell it is meat? It must take a lot
of A-1 sauce to force it down.

-- Yip

"Kent H." > wrote in message >...
> Cooking any meat product to 197F is a bit insane, something you would do
> in a cave. How did you tell it was meat?

When you burn the hell out of one of your steaks,
how do you tell it is meat? It must take a lot
of A-1 sauce to force it down.

-- Yip

"Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
...
> Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
> here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
> there may be some hope for your family.
> Jack


You don't know Jack, Jack

Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.


_CAL

"cl" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
> > here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds
like
> > there may be some hope for your family.
> > Jack
>
>
> You don't know Jack, Jack
>
> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
>
>
> _CAL
Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
Jack

"cl" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
> > here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds
like
> > there may be some hope for your family.
> > Jack
>
>
> You don't know Jack, Jack
>
> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
>
>
> _CAL
Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
Jack

"cl" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
> > here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds
like
> > there may be some hope for your family.
> > Jack
>
>
> You don't know Jack, Jack
>
> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
>
>
> _CAL
Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
Jack

Jack Sloan wrote:
> "cl" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
>>> here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
>>> there may be some hope for your family.
>>> Jack
>>
>>
>> You don't know Jack, Jack
>>
>> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
>>
>>
>> _CAL
> Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
> Jack

ROTFL MAO!
(for Kent/Cal, that's "Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off!)

Great reply, Jack.

BOB

Jack Sloan wrote:
> "cl" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
>>> here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
>>> there may be some hope for your family.
>>> Jack
>>
>>
>> You don't know Jack, Jack
>>
>> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
>>
>>
>> _CAL
> Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
> Jack

ROTFL MAO!
(for Kent/Cal, that's "Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off!)

Great reply, Jack.

BOB

BOB wrote:
>
> Jack Sloan wrote:
> > "cl" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
> >>> here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
> >>> there may be some hope for your family.
> >>> Jack
> >>
> >>
> >> You don't know Jack, Jack
> >>
> >> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
> >>
> >>
> >> _CAL
> > Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
> > Jack
>
> ROTFL MAO!
> (for Kent/Cal, that's "Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off!)
>
> Great reply, Jack.
>
> BOB

Back to my comment about having 1st grade humor. You guys need to get
out in the world a bit more. Funny thing is you are both probably old
farts thinking kid humor is funny. Assuming you found the right hole
many years ago, I guess your kid humor will be a hit with the grand
kids.

-CAL

BOB wrote:
>
> Jack Sloan wrote:
> > "cl" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever posted
> >>> here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your niece sounds like
> >>> there may be some hope for your family.
> >>> Jack
> >>
> >>
> >> You don't know Jack, Jack
> >>
> >> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
> >>
> >>
> >> _CAL
> > Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
> > Jack
>
> ROTFL MAO!
> (for Kent/Cal, that's "Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off!)
>
> Great reply, Jack.
>
> BOB

Back to my comment about having 1st grade humor. You guys need to get
out in the world a bit more. Funny thing is you are both probably old
farts thinking kid humor is funny. Assuming you found the right hole
many years ago, I guess your kid humor will be a hit with the grand
kids.

-CAL

cl wrote:
> BOB wrote:
>>
>> Jack Sloan wrote:
>>> "cl" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Jack may be a bit harsh calling you the dumbest guy who has ever
>>>>> posted here...but maybe not. Don't give up hope though...your
>>>>> niece sounds like there may be some hope for your family.
>>>>> Jack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't know Jack, Jack
>>>>
>>>> Great reading comprehension. He was talking about Kent you whanker.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _CAL
>>> Kent , Cal...what's the difference?
>>> Jack
>>
>> ROTFL MAO!
>> (for Kent/Cal, that's "Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off!)
>>
>> Great reply, Jack.
>>
>> BOB
>
> Back to my comment about having 1st grade humor. You guys need to get
> out in the world a bit more. Funny thing is you are both probably old
> farts thinking kid humor is funny. Assuming you found the right hole
> many years ago, I guess your kid humor will be a hit with the grand
> kids.
>
> -CAL

Cal is a stinkerpot! Cal is a stinkerpot! Nyaa nyaa nyaa nyaa nyaaaaaa! Cal
is a stinkerpot!

And a fartso too!

--
Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
and his 6" boner
I apologize for my outburst<g>