with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:58:53 GMT, "Ch"
> wrote:

>Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
>http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>

You have to admit, some types of gas leave more of a flavor trace than
others . . .

In other news, I tried something new yesterday. I was getting a
meatloaf ready for the oven, and it looked is usual quiet,
non-impressive self. Then I thought "Hey, I've got a lazy person's
smoker sitting right out side that door..." Hmmmm....

Anyway, meatloaf smoked over pecan for 2-1/2 hours at 250 is very
moist and most excellent. I put it in an aluminum pan, not touching
the sides, so it would be maximum exposure to the smoke. Yum...

Grins,

Lori Hunt
SE TN

New Braunfels Bandera
Great Outdoors Smokey Mountain Series #3600

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:58:53 GMT, "Ch"
> wrote:

>Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
>http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>

You have to admit, some types of gas leave more of a flavor trace than
others . . .

In other news, I tried something new yesterday. I was getting a
meatloaf ready for the oven, and it looked is usual quiet,
non-impressive self. Then I thought "Hey, I've got a lazy person's
smoker sitting right out side that door..." Hmmmm....

Anyway, meatloaf smoked over pecan for 2-1/2 hours at 250 is very
moist and most excellent. I put it in an aluminum pan, not touching
the sides, so it would be maximum exposure to the smoke. Yum...

Grins,

Lori Hunt
SE TN

New Braunfels Bandera
Great Outdoors Smokey Mountain Series #3600

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

"Ch" > wrote in message
...
> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg


I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

"Ch" > wrote in message
...
> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg


I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

Lori Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:58:53 GMT, "Ch"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
>>http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>>
>
>
> You have to admit, some types of gas leave more of a flavor trace than
> others . . .
>
> In other news, I tried something new yesterday. I was getting a
> meatloaf ready for the oven,

Somehow, the mention of meatloaf after seeing the gas Q-ing
photo above is amusing to me.

Dana

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

Lori Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:58:53 GMT, "Ch"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
>>http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>>
>
>
> You have to admit, some types of gas leave more of a flavor trace than
> others . . .
>
> In other news, I tried something new yesterday. I was getting a
> meatloaf ready for the oven,

Somehow, the mention of meatloaf after seeing the gas Q-ing
photo above is amusing to me.

Dana

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

Well, he was GRILLING...DUH!!


"Ch" > wrote in message
...
> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>
>

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

Well, he was GRILLING...DUH!!


"Ch" > wrote in message
...
> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>
>

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:57:33 GMT, "cl" > wrote:

>
>"Ch" > wrote in message
.. .
>> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
>> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>
>I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting
>

You know, hijacking a thread just to hump Monroe's leg doesn't really
reflect well on you. It's bad enough when you engage in the
leg-humping in threads he's actually posted to.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:57:33 GMT, "cl" > wrote:

>
>"Ch" > wrote in message
.. .
>> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
>> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
>
>I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting
>

You know, hijacking a thread just to hump Monroe's leg doesn't really
reflect well on you. It's bad enough when you engage in the
leg-humping in threads he's actually posted to.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:57:33 GMT, "cl" > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Ch" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> >> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
> >
> >I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting
> >
>
> You know, hijacking a thread just to hump Monroe's leg doesn't really
> reflect well on you. It's bad enough when you engage in the
> leg-humping in threads he's actually posted to.


You just hijacked the thread. I just gave commentary.

Monroe started lotsa shit in that past and I'm recipricating. Monroe only
pipes in with personal attacks so I said wtf, time for me to give the goob
some of his own. Get over it Kevin.


<rantmode>

What is with the gang mentality(with composite IQ of 100)? Doesn't it make
you feel feable that you(plural) can't take up for yourselves?

You know, just because I called question into Dave's statements a few months
ago in regard to gas cookers for bbq, the wacky circus clowns of this group
decided to jump out of their Kamados and attack. Not one of you will
address the points of fact that I bring up and only rebut with
generalizations or rebuccous remarks. That is a sure sign of not knowing the
topic at hand very well. Someone that knows the subject could reply with
particulars based on real knowledge of why/why not something will works.
Instead you think you can hide your ignorance with personal attacks or by
way of the ass patting of the rest of the crew. Ultimately you gratify your
thoughts though the actions of the other eight ******s that rule the
newsgroup. Oh well enjoy the ignorant bliss you guys share.

</rantmode>


-CAL

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:57:33 GMT, "cl" > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Ch" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> >> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
> >
> >I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting
> >
>
> You know, hijacking a thread just to hump Monroe's leg doesn't really
> reflect well on you. It's bad enough when you engage in the
> leg-humping in threads he's actually posted to.


You just hijacked the thread. I just gave commentary.

Monroe started lotsa shit in that past and I'm recipricating. Monroe only
pipes in with personal attacks so I said wtf, time for me to give the goob
some of his own. Get over it Kevin.


<rantmode>

What is with the gang mentality(with composite IQ of 100)? Doesn't it make
you feel feable that you(plural) can't take up for yourselves?

You know, just because I called question into Dave's statements a few months
ago in regard to gas cookers for bbq, the wacky circus clowns of this group
decided to jump out of their Kamados and attack. Not one of you will
address the points of fact that I bring up and only rebut with
generalizations or rebuccous remarks. That is a sure sign of not knowing the
topic at hand very well. Someone that knows the subject could reply with
particulars based on real knowledge of why/why not something will works.
Instead you think you can hide your ignorance with personal attacks or by
way of the ass patting of the rest of the crew. Ultimately you gratify your
thoughts though the actions of the other eight ******s that rule the
newsgroup. Oh well enjoy the ignorant bliss you guys share.

</rantmode>


-CAL

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:57:33 GMT, "cl" > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Ch" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> Why Q-ing with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
> >> http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/GasGrill.jpg
> >
> >I finally have a picture of Monroe and oddly it seemed fitting
> >
>
> You know, hijacking a thread just to hump Monroe's leg doesn't really
> reflect well on you. It's bad enough when you engage in the
> leg-humping in threads he's actually posted to.


You just hijacked the thread. I just gave commentary.

Monroe started lotsa shit in that past and I'm recipricating. Monroe only
pipes in with personal attacks so I said wtf, time for me to give the goob
some of his own. Get over it Kevin.


<rantmode>

What is with the gang mentality(with composite IQ of 100)? Doesn't it make
you feel feable that you(plural) can't take up for yourselves?

You know, just because I called question into Dave's statements a few months
ago in regard to gas cookers for bbq, the wacky circus clowns of this group
decided to jump out of their Kamados and attack. Not one of you will
address the points of fact that I bring up and only rebut with
generalizations or rebuccous remarks. That is a sure sign of not knowing the
topic at hand very well. Someone that knows the subject could reply with
particulars based on real knowledge of why/why not something will works.
Instead you think you can hide your ignorance with personal attacks or by
way of the ass patting of the rest of the crew. Ultimately you gratify your
thoughts though the actions of the other eight ******s that rule the
newsgroup. Oh well enjoy the ignorant bliss you guys share.

</rantmode>


-CAL

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:38:15 GMT, "cl" > wrote:

>Someone that knows the subject could reply with
>particulars based on real knowledge of why/why not something will works.

Maybe I missed it the first time around, so could you remind me how
many hours you've spent cooking on a Kamado?

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:38:15 GMT, "cl" > wrote:

>Someone that knows the subject could reply with
>particulars based on real knowledge of why/why not something will works.

Maybe I missed it the first time around, so could you remind me how
many hours you've spent cooking on a Kamado?

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

with Gas is not as good as Charcoal
 

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:38:15 GMT, "cl" > wrote:
>
> >Someone that knows the subject could reply with
> >particulars based on real knowledge of why/why not something will works.
>
> Maybe I missed it the first time around, so could you remind me how
> many hours you've spent cooking on a Kamado?

Once again, what does hours logged on a K have in the slightest to do with
gasgrills?

We were talking about new gas grills and I introduces hybrids with smoking
abilities. So why exactly are you pulling a Kamado into this?


-CAL