Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 04-06-2004, 03:35 AM
Jeneen Sommers
 
Posts: n/a
Default bones in boston butt


I picked up two boston butts from the butcher today.
The fellow I usually get them from wasn't there today,
and I had to try to explain what I needed to a fellow
who only speaks German (which I don't).

So he fired up the saw and cut me two nice pieces
of pork shoulder, but they have alot of bone. It
looks like part of the spine, and some flat bony
pieces.

I'm planning on having them on the K tomorrow for BBQ
on Saturday afternoon. My question is, should I remove
the bones? Leave them on and cook the pork 1.5 hours per
pound still (they're 11-12 pounds each, with the bone)?
Leave them on and cook the pork 1.5 hours per pound of
meat, figuring the bones are a couple of pounds?
Would the bones make the end result more flavorful?

Thanks guys...I don't post often, but I _really_ appreciate
everything I learn from your experience!

Jeneen


  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 04-06-2004, 03:50 AM
Dave Bugg
 
Posts: n/a
Default bones in boston butt

Jeneen Sommers wrote:

I'm planning on having them on the K tomorrow for BBQ
on Saturday afternoon. My question is, should I remove
the bones? Leave them on and cook the pork 1.5 hours per
pound still (they're 11-12 pounds each, with the bone)?
Leave them on and cook the pork 1.5 hours per pound of
meat, figuring the bones are a couple of pounds?
Would the bones make the end result more flavorful?


I prefer to have them with the bone in. Cook according to gross weight. The
bone is a good clue to the doneness of the pork, as it pulls out of the meat
easily when the pork reaches the pullable stage. IMO, it can make the 'Qing
go a bit quicker due to the bone acting as a heat sink, but 1.5 to 2.0 hours
per pound is still a good rough guage.
Dave


  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 04-06-2004, 05:20 AM
Jeneen Sommers
 
Posts: n/a
Default bones in boston butt



On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, it was written:

I prefer to have them with the bone in. Cook according to gross weight. The
bone is a good clue to the doneness of the pork, as it pulls out of the meat
easily when the pork reaches the pullable stage. IMO, it can make the 'Qing
go a bit quicker due to the bone acting as a heat sink, but 1.5 to 2.0 hours
per pound is still a good rough guage.
Dave


Thanks! I'll keep the bones in, and report back.

Jeneen

  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 07-06-2004, 11:10 PM
Jeneen Sommers
 
Posts: n/a
Default bones in boston butt



On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, it was written:

Jeneen Sommers wrote:

I'm planning on having them on the K tomorrow for BBQ
on Saturday afternoon. My question is, should I remove
the bones? Leave them on and cook the pork 1.5 hours per
pound still (they're 11-12 pounds each, with the bone)?
Leave them on and cook the pork 1.5 hours per pound of
meat, figuring the bones are a couple of pounds?
Would the bones make the end result more flavorful?


I prefer to have them with the bone in. Cook according to gross weight. The
bone is a good clue to the doneness of the pork, as it pulls out of the meat
easily when the pork reaches the pullable stage. IMO, it can make the 'Qing
go a bit quicker due to the bone acting as a heat sink, but 1.5 to 2.0 hours
per pound is still a good rough guage.
Dave


Update: The pork temperature was up to 195F after about 12-13 hours at
220, much sooner than I expected. I thought they still could have been cooked
longer because there was more fat in the meat than I usually get,
especially for 195F (temperature was taken in a big meaty part). I don't know
if that had anything to do with the bone or not.

I'm not sure what I would do different in the future - probably get the
pork shoulders without bone since I haven't had trouble with that in the
past. If I do get bone-in meat again, based on this experience, I'll
probably try cooking it to a higher internal temperature, and risk having
it overdone...just to see what happens. Or do you think that would be a
huge mistake? Live and learn!

Thanks for the help -

Jeneen




  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 07-06-2004, 11:24 PM
Dave Bugg
 
Posts: n/a
Default bones in boston butt

Jeneen Sommers wrote:

Update: The pork temperature was up to 195F after about 12-13 hours
at 220, much sooner than I expected. I thought they still could have
been cooked longer because there was more fat in the meat than I
usually get,
especially for 195F (temperature was taken in a big meaty part). I
don't know if that had anything to do with the bone or not.


It sounds like it turned out fine.
Dave




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boston Butt? jmcquown[_2_] General Cooking 80 30-10-2012 10:52 AM
Boston Butt mom peagram General Cooking 17 08-11-2008 05:06 PM
Boston Butt - Second Try Karen C. Barbecue 68 16-09-2007 12:49 AM
Why Boston Butt LT Barbecue 6 21-07-2005 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"

 

Copyright © 2017