Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,622
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork

Peter A wrote:
>>> Note where I said, "You can't rely on time alone". Yes, you do
>>> have to cook it slow for BBQ, but you can cook it at 350-375,
>>> and it will still be pullable when it reaches 190.. But in no way
>>> can you say "cook a pork butt [for pulled pork] for 7 hours and
>>> it'll be done.", which simply is not true.

>>

>
> Then why have I done it by time, not temperature, dozens of times and
> it is always great? And why do you never, and I mean NEVER, see a
> thermometer used in the various well-known BBQ joints around here? The
> pit bosses would laugh you into the next county if you suggested a
> thermometer.
>
> People have been cooking BBQ and other meats by the time/temperature
> method for centuries, I suppose they were all wrong too.
>
> Your method may work fine, but so does mine. For you to say it doesn't
> just reveals your ignorance.


--
"So long, so long, and thanks for all the fish!"
Dave
www.davebbq.com



  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork


"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message
...
> Peter A wrote:
>>>> Note where I said, "You can't rely on time alone". Yes, you do
>>>> have to cook it slow for BBQ, but you can cook it at 350-375,
>>>> and it will still be pullable when it reaches 190.. But in no way
>>>> can you say "cook a pork butt [for pulled pork] for 7 hours and
>>>> it'll be done.", which simply is not true.
>>>

>>
>> Then why have I done it by time, not temperature, dozens of times and
>> it is always great? And why do you never, and I mean NEVER, see a
>> thermometer used in the various well-known BBQ joints around here? The
>> pit bosses would laugh you into the next county if you suggested a
>> thermometer.
>>
>> People have been cooking BBQ and other meats by the time/temperature
>> method for centuries, I suppose they were all wrong too.
>>
>> Your method may work fine, but so does mine. For you to say it doesn't
>> just reveals your ignorance.

>
> --
> "So long, so long, and thanks for all the fish!"
> Dave
> www.davebbq.com
>


Haven't mastered our newsreader yet, have we?


  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,847
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork

Steve Wertz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2007 19:55:22 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>
> > "Dave Bugg" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Peter A wrote:
> >>>>> Note where I said, "You can't rely on time alone". Yes, you do
> >>>>> have to cook it slow for BBQ, but you can cook it at 350-375,
> >>>>> and it will still be pullable when it reaches 190.. But in no way
> >>>>> can you say "cook a pork butt [for pulled pork] for 7 hours and
> >>>>> it'll be done.", which simply is not true.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Then why have I done it by time, not temperature, dozens of times and
> >>> it is always great? And why do you never, and I mean NEVER, see a
> >>> thermometer used in the various well-known BBQ joints around here? The
> >>> pit bosses would laugh you into the next county if you suggested a
> >>> thermometer.
> >>>
> >>> People have been cooking BBQ and other meats by the time/temperature
> >>> method for centuries, I suppose they were all wrong too.
> >>>
> >>> Your method may work fine, but so does mine. For you to say it doesn't
> >>> just reveals your ignorance.
> >>
> >> --
> >> "So long, so long, and thanks for all the fish!"
> >> Dave
> >> www.davebbq.com
> >>

> >
> > Haven't mastered our newsreader yet, have we?

>
> I looks like Dave is throwing him the wolves at
> alt.food.barbecue: Where the *real* pros and people who actually
> want to learn the secrets to good BBQ hang out.
>
> -sw


I'm afraid I haven't seen much bbq content on a.f.b in a couple years...
Used to be good when I first looked at it mid '04, but not any more.
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 886
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork

On Thu, 03 May 2007 02:25:50 GMT, "Pete C." >
wrote:

>I'm afraid I haven't seen much bbq content on a.f.b in a couple years...
>Used to be good when I first looked at it mid '04, but not any more.


Play to their strengths. Ask 'em how they feel about black people.
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,622
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork

Steve Wertz wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 09:01:22 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 02:25:50 GMT, "Pete C." >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm afraid I haven't seen much bbq content on a.f.b in a couple
>>> years... Used to be good when I first looked at it mid '04, but not
>>> any more.

>>
>> Play to their strengths. Ask 'em how they feel about black people.

>
> Oops. I must have smelled him creeping towards us.


Pungent, ain't he?

--
"So long, so long, and thanks for all the fish!"
Dave
www.davebbq.com





  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,847
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork

Steve Wertz wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 02:25:50 GMT, Pete C. wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid I haven't seen much bbq content on a.f.b in a couple years...
> > Used to be good when I first looked at it mid '04, but not any more.

>
> That's funny. I see dozens of threads int he last couple months
> regarding BBQ.


Perhaps my SNET/SBC/ATT/Whoever-the-hell-they-are-this-month news server
has issues since I don't recall seeing that level of activity.

> Are you sure your reading alt.food.barbecue and
> not alt.food.barbeque?


Yep.

>
> There were a few bad months when we had KSW crying, whining, and
> trolling all the time, but things are getting better.


I hope things are getting better, they were good when I first looked at
the group. Getting back into 'Q season now, down to one foodsaver pack
of brisket in the freezer left from my last 'Q run. Going to have to do
another big batch soon, was very nice having the freezer stocked over
the winter.

Pete C.
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.barbecue,rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,999
Default North Carolina Pulled Pork


"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message
...
>
> Pungent, ain't he?


AKA, "aue de kibology".

Funny aroma.

Graeme


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you're looking for BBQ in North Carolina sf[_9_] General Cooking 6 01-08-2015 06:28 PM
North Carolina BBQ Ideas Barry Barbecue 8 17-07-2009 12:20 AM
North Carolina Pulled Pork Peter A General Cooking 35 04-05-2007 03:09 AM
North Carolina Pulled Pork Dave Bugg Barbecue 0 03-05-2007 12:41 AM
Carolina Pulled Pork is bad!!! Piedmont Barbecue 50 03-11-2004 04:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"