Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Baking (rec.food.baking) For bakers, would-be bakers, and fans and consumers of breads, pastries, cakes, pies, cookies, crackers, bagels, and other items commonly found in a bakery. Includes all methods of preparation, both conventional and not. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Growing bread dough the right way.
In my experience, most of the time I work with a high hydration dough, the
dough has a tendency to proof outward more than upward. The result for me is usually a fairly wide and flat bread. This week I tried a new formula for a basic bread from a French baking book. The dough was 68% hydrated, had a normal amount of fresh yeast, no sugar and more salt than I prefer. I think I started with 4 lb. of dough. Nothing unusual except that I would consider it a high hydration dough. I mixed it for about 10 minutes and then let it rest for about 1/2 an hour. Then I kneaded it by hand until it stopped sticking to the board. I then gave it a two hour fermentation. I made it up into batards and let them proof for around 1/2 an hour at 90 degrees. At that point the loaves had spread out quite a bit sideways and were relatively flat. I frowned and decided at that point to go ahead and bake them up not expecting to get very good bread. The color, feel and sound of the loaves was about right after 25 minutes or so at 400 degrees. But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole type texture in the top half (underproofed.) Help me understand what motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all directions. I've never seen it before in a wet, underproofed dough. Ideas? Fred Foodie Forums http://www.foodieforums.com |
|
|||
|
|||
"Fred" > wrote in message ... > In my experience, most of the time I work with a high hydration dough, the > dough has a tendency to proof outward more than upward. The result for me > is usually a fairly wide and flat bread. This week I tried a new formula > for a basic bread from a French baking book. The dough was 68% hydrated, > had a normal amount of fresh yeast, no sugar and more salt than I prefer. > I think I started with 4 lb. of dough. Nothing unusual except that I would > consider it a high hydration dough. I mixed it for about 10 minutes and > then let it rest for about 1/2 an hour. Then I kneaded it by hand until it > stopped sticking to the board. I then gave it a two hour fermentation. I > made it up into batards and let them proof for around 1/2 an hour at 90 > degrees. At that point the loaves had spread out quite a bit sideways and > were relatively flat. I frowned and decided at that point to go ahead and > bake them up not expecting to get very good bread. The color, feel and > sound of the loaves was about right after 25 minutes or so at 400 degrees. > > But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and > the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall > as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that > much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate > underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight > texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole > type texture in the top half (underproofed.) Help me understand what > motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all > directions. I've never seen it before in a wet, underproofed dough. Ideas? > > Fred > Foodie Forums > http://www.foodieforums.com > > An undoubted master of high hydration doughs is John, on alt.bread.recipes. He makes "doughs" up to 110% hydration. I suggest you pose your question there. HTH Graham |
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:21:55 -0500, Fred wrote:
> But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and > the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall > as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that > much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate > underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight > texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole > type texture in the top half (underproofed.) I think your assessment of being 'underproofed' might be off. My experience is that underproofing usually causes massive, chaotic breaks and that the entire crumb is tight. Were the holes so large as to be crust seperation? If not, it seems spot on to me. I make 100% hydrated dough up quite often (2x per week) and this type of transformation is normal. > Help me understand what > motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all > directions. I've never seen it before... I'd say maybe that it's because steam rises. Your dough structure was near perfect in development and so you ended up with a good bake-off. If you've never seen this before, welcome to the world of success! |
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:21:55 -0500, Fred wrote:
> But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and > the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall > as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that > much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate > underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight > texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole > type texture in the top half (underproofed.) I think your assessment of being 'underproofed' might be off. My experience is that underproofing usually causes massive, chaotic breaks and that the entire crumb is tight. Were the holes so large as to be crust seperation? If not, it seems spot on to me. I make 100% hydrated dough up quite often (2x per week) and this type of transformation is normal. > Help me understand what > motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all > directions. I've never seen it before... I'd say maybe that it's because steam rises. Your dough structure was near perfect in development and so you ended up with a good bake-off. If you've never seen this before, welcome to the world of success! |
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:21:55 -0500, Fred wrote:
> But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and > the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall > as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that > much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate > underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight > texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole > type texture in the top half (underproofed.) I think your assessment of being 'underproofed' might be off. My experience is that underproofing usually causes massive, chaotic breaks and that the entire crumb is tight. Were the holes so large as to be crust seperation? If not, it seems spot on to me. I make 100% hydrated dough up quite often (2x per week) and this type of transformation is normal. > Help me understand what > motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all > directions. I've never seen it before... I'd say maybe that it's because steam rises. Your dough structure was near perfect in development and so you ended up with a good bake-off. If you've never seen this before, welcome to the world of success! |
|
|||
|
|||
"Fred" > wrote in message >...
> In my experience, most of the time I work with a high hydration dough, the > dough has a tendency to proof outward more than upward. The result for me > is usually a fairly wide and flat bread. This week I tried a new formula > for a basic bread from a French baking book. The dough was 68% hydrated, > had a normal amount of fresh yeast, no sugar and more salt than I prefer. > I think I started with 4 lb. of dough. Nothing unusual except that I would > consider it a high hydration dough. I mixed it for about 10 minutes and > then let it rest for about 1/2 an hour. Then I kneaded it by hand until it > stopped sticking to the board. I then gave it a two hour fermentation. I > made it up into batards and let them proof for around 1/2 an hour at 90 > degrees. At that point the loaves had spread out quite a bit sideways and > were relatively flat. I frowned and decided at that point to go ahead and > bake them up not expecting to get very good bread. The color, feel and > sound of the loaves was about right after 25 minutes or so at 400 degrees. > > But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and > the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall > as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that > much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate > underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight > texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole > type texture in the top half (underproofed.) Help me understand what > motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all > directions. I've never seen it before in a wet, underproofed dough. Ideas? > > Fred > Foodie Forums > http://www.foodieforums.com WEll you may had used a really strong flour resulting that the expansion was balanced in all direction with excellent baking volume. In addition your fermentation timing was appropriate, but they are not considerably underproofed,but rather in the level of three quarters proofed when you baked it. BTW, that french baking book you used, is that the Special and Decorative Bread by Bilheux et al? Roy |
|
|||
|
|||
"Fred" > wrote in message >...
> In my experience, most of the time I work with a high hydration dough, the > dough has a tendency to proof outward more than upward. The result for me > is usually a fairly wide and flat bread. This week I tried a new formula > for a basic bread from a French baking book. The dough was 68% hydrated, > had a normal amount of fresh yeast, no sugar and more salt than I prefer. > I think I started with 4 lb. of dough. Nothing unusual except that I would > consider it a high hydration dough. I mixed it for about 10 minutes and > then let it rest for about 1/2 an hour. Then I kneaded it by hand until it > stopped sticking to the board. I then gave it a two hour fermentation. I > made it up into batards and let them proof for around 1/2 an hour at 90 > degrees. At that point the loaves had spread out quite a bit sideways and > were relatively flat. I frowned and decided at that point to go ahead and > bake them up not expecting to get very good bread. The color, feel and > sound of the loaves was about right after 25 minutes or so at 400 degrees. > > But to my surprise the loaves had climbed straight upward in the oven and > the finished loaves weren't flat at all but well rounded and almost as tall > as they were wide. Certainly they were underproofed since they grew that > much and they did display a slight amount of the stretch marks that indicate > underproofing but very little of it. The crumb showed a fairly normal tight > texture in the bottom half of the loaf and a wide open artisanal large hole > type texture in the top half (underproofed.) Help me understand what > motivated these loaves to grow straigh up instead of growing in all > directions. I've never seen it before in a wet, underproofed dough. Ideas? > > Fred > Foodie Forums > http://www.foodieforums.com WEll you may had used a really strong flour resulting that the expansion was balanced in all direction with excellent baking volume. In addition your fermentation timing was appropriate, but they are not considerably underproofed,but rather in the level of three quarters proofed when you baked it. BTW, that french baking book you used, is that the Special and Decorative Bread by Bilheux et al? Roy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FROZEN BREAD DOUGH | General Cooking | |||
Frozen Bread Dough | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Sourdough bread and the bread machine dough cycle | Sourdough | |||
I make stove top bread frequently. I make dough, flatten it (usually) to fit the bottom of my cast iron frypan, and cook it really slowly. Sometimes I let it rise, sometimes not. Depending on the dough volume, it ranges from a half inch thick to two | Recipes | |||
Bread dough | Baking |