> Dan Goodman wrote:
> > I want to boil potatoes in a slow cooker. Googling for recipes
> > turns up: 1) Recipes for stuff which can be served with boiled
> > potatoes 2) Recipes for dishes which include boiled potatoes -- and
> > it seems at least half of them say to boil the potatoes and then
> > add them.
> I've never heard of it but I don't see why it couldn't be done.
> Would take a terribly long time, though, even with the slow cooker
> set to High. Probably more efficient to just boil them in a pan on
> the stove. Definitely faster!
However, a slow cooker is safer to leave unwatched.
"You, each of you, have some special wild cards. Play with them.
Find out what makes you different and better. Because it is there,
if only you can find it." Vernor Vinge, _Rainbows End_