ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 09:20:38 GMT, Dutch > wrote:
>pearl wrote:
>> "Dutch" > wrote in message news:XhQti.39249$fJ5.34707@pd7urf1no...
>
>>> He just doesn't get it, they *read* those books, they DON'T AGREE with
>>> the arguments! They could have said, "Mr Regan, you fool, didn't you
>>> read *my* book? but they all have too much class to put on such a
>>> childish display.
>>
>> He 'got' that their arguments reflected ignorance of the literature.
>
>They aren't ignorant, they read "The literature", as you converts like
>to refer to your blessed sacred scrolls, several of them remark on that
>fact, and they *reject* the arguments. It's not the revealed truth of
>God you know, they're the *opinions* of people that agree with Reagan,
>and *his own books*. He's an arrogant toad addressing highly respected
>authors and fellow philosophers in that manner, but typical of the ARA,
>he feels superior to them and entitled to verbally abuse them.
>
><snip usual verbal abuse>
>
>
|