"Can Altinbay" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
> "Chris Morton" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > If you assume the worst of a gender, that's an insult. If it's against
> women,
> > that's misogyny. You have assumed from the beginning that a woman
hasn't
> got
> > enough sense to act appropriately when a violent attacker attempts to
harm
> and
> > or disarm her. There's a really simple solution to that problem, and we
> both
> > know what it is. Why have you not admitted what it is? Because you
don't
> want
> > to see the rapist come to harm.
> >
>
> WHO assumes the worst of a gender? HOW is the woman going not not let the
> rapist take the gun?

Thank your for repeating the proof that indeed YOU DO assume the worst of
the female gender.


> You yourself, in your .sig, which is NOT on topic for
> the group, said that the gun protects the woman from the rapist. That
> implies that the rapist is strong enough to wrest it from her, provided
that
> she can even reach the gun in enough time. You have also advocated new
> women's fashion - holsters. Have we really come to that?
>

You are the one who supposes that a woman would be so helpless and
incompetent that she would not be able to bring to bear a weapon in case of
attack ?
Do you ALWAYS make such an assumption about the abilities of women to
respond to assault ?
Is this based on any evidence on your part ?
Or is it based on your need to believe that women are not only the weaker
sex, but the incompetent sex as well ?

By the way, where has Chris talked about either
women's fashion ?
or holsters ?

Seems like you're projecting again..



> Your reasoning sucks bigtime. No one is protecting the rapist. This is
> really the kind of stuff people come up with so often because they don't
> have real arguments.
>

Another projection about "protecting the rapist"


> > As for the purpose of this newsgroup, I attempted to use it for that
> purpose.
> > You have attempted to divert it from same.
> >
>
> But you have a .sig that is off topic and you insist on inflicting on us
> every time. Do you think that we enjoy reading it?
>

"Inflicting"
Are you telling us that his sig is actually causing you suffering of some
sort ?
Why don't you tell us EXACTLY how it causes you suffering ?
(This shoudl be good)

> If you think it's off topic, and it really bothers you, don't respond.
Let
> it die.
>

Practice what you preach, bub..
Then you won't inflict on yourself the need to think about why this is
causing you such "suffering"..