ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
pearl wrote:
> "Dutch" > wrote in message news:XhQti.39249$fJ5.34707@pd7urf1no...
>> He just doesn't get it, they *read* those books, they DON'T AGREE with
>> the arguments! They could have said, "Mr Regan, you fool, didn't you
>> read *my* book? but they all have too much class to put on such a
>> childish display.
>
> He 'got' that their arguments reflected ignorance of the literature.
They aren't ignorant, they read "The literature", as you converts like
to refer to your blessed sacred scrolls, several of them remark on that
fact, and they *reject* the arguments. It's not the revealed truth of
God you know, they're the *opinions* of people that agree with Reagan,
and *his own books*. He's an arrogant toad addressing highly respected
authors and fellow philosophers in that manner, but typical of the ARA,
he feels superior to them and entitled to verbally abuse them.
<snip usual verbal abuse>
|