skirt-boy: burden of proof not met
On Aug 1, 5:21 pm, Dutch > wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 5:30 am, Dutch > wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Aug 1, 7:29 pm, Dutch > wrote:
> >>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 1, 5:47 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>> [..]
> >>>>>> Take it down, rupie. You are not authorized to post
> >>>>>> personal references and photos on your site.- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>> Okay, well do you want to talk this over from the legal point of view?
> >>>>> Initially all I did was post a short excerpt from one of your posts in
> >>>>> the context of your full name. It didn't occur to me that it would be
> >>>>> an issue.
> >>>> Now that he has specifically requested that you not publish personal
> >>>> information about him, you should just take it down.
> >>> I've taken down the later changes I made. As for taking down the
> >>> actual name, we'll see. It's kind of an interesting concept, Jonathan
> >>> Ball asking me for a favour. We'll see how his negotiating skills
> >>> develop.
> >>>> What's more you
> >>>> ought to stop responding to him, it's not doing any good, he's just
> >>>> mocking you.
> >>> You've got the idea that I'd be better off not replying to him, well,
> >>> I'm having fun making fun of him for the moment, actually, so thanks
> >>> for the advice but I think I'll ignore it.
> >> This unseemly exchange just shows that your claims to moral and
> >> intellectual high ground are nothing more than a charade.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Why don't you, just once, make some comment about Ball's moral
> > character, instead of being his good pal all the time? Sheesh. Give me
> > a break.
>
> I see nothing wrong with his moral character. He's got a down and dirty
> usenet posting style and makes no bones about it. If you can't take the
> heat stay out of the kitchen, it's trivially easy to killfile someone.
Is that your way of saying "Goo is a goof"?
|