On Aug 1, 9:31 pm, Derek > wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:50:32 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
> >On Aug 1, 6:28 pm, Derek > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:41:23 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>
> >> [..]
>
> >> >Let me get this straight, Ball. I am perfectly happy to sign my full
> >> >name and photo to all my Internet activity. You, apparently, are a bit
> >> >uncomfortable with the idea that, within a few days, anyone will be
> >> >able to type your name into Google and find a record of this debate.
>
> >> You've provided much more than just that, you spiteful little
> >> prick, including a link to Lesley's spiteful little page, so take
> >> it down. If anyone wants to find a record of your arguments
> >> with him they can go through Google archives and find them
> >> in the usual way. There's certainly no need to publish his
> >> whereabouts and a photograph of him alongside your
> >> arguments, so take it down and stop being spiteful.
>
> >I've taken down the photo and the extra page I added. That's what a
> >nice guy I am. As for the question of having his full name up there,
> >he'll have to develop his negotiating skills if he wants me to get rid
> >of that. Perhaps he'll come to realize that it could be much worse.
>
> >I really find it extraordinary that you feel entitled to take the
> >moral high ground with me in the light of your behaviour towards Karen
> >Winter.
>
> I see Karen as a potential threat to children, especially
> while she tries to hide her identity here by lying about it
> after being kicked out of her parish.
>

Give me a break. Of course Karen's no threat to children. I don't
think even you believe such rubbish. It was a petty act of spite on
your part and you're certainly in no position to be taking the moral
high ground with me over this incident.