skirt-boy: burden of proof not met
Rupert wrote:
> On Aug 1, 7:29 pm, Dutch > wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Aug 1, 5:47 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>>>> Take it down, rupie. You are not authorized to post
>>>> personal references and photos on your site.- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> Okay, well do you want to talk this over from the legal point of view?
>>> Initially all I did was post a short excerpt from one of your posts in
>>> the context of your full name. It didn't occur to me that it would be
>>> an issue.
>> Now that he has specifically requested that you not publish personal
>> information about him, you should just take it down.
>
> I've taken down the later changes I made. As for taking down the
> actual name, we'll see. It's kind of an interesting concept, Jonathan
> Ball asking me for a favour. We'll see how his negotiating skills
> develop.
>
>> What's more you
>> ought to stop responding to him, it's not doing any good, he's just
>> mocking you.
>
> You've got the idea that I'd be better off not replying to him, well,
> I'm having fun making fun of him for the moment, actually, so thanks
> for the advice but I think I'll ignore it.
This unseemly exchange just shows that your claims to moral and
intellectual high ground are nothing more than a charade.
|