View Single Post
  #134 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Derek[_2_] Derek[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default skirt-boy: burden of proof not met

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 12:50:06 +0100, "pearl" > wrote:
>"Derek" > wrote in message ...
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:49:07 +0100, "pearl" > wrote:
>> >"Derek" > wrote in message ...
>> >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:16:01 +0100, "pearl" > wrote:
>> >> >"Derek" > wrote in message news >> >> >> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:17:16 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>> >> >> >On Aug 1, 5:17 pm, Derek > wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:30:39 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> [..]
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Why?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Because he hasn't given you his permission. Take it down.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Could you elaborate? Is this a legal argument, or a moral argument?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A moral one. Keep your arguments with him on Usenet, not on a web
>> >> >> page which includes photographs and details of his whereabouts. You
>> >> >> want to go down Lesley's spiteful little road?
>> >> >
>> >> >Threads can appear on quite a few forums as searchable web pages.
>> >> >There is nothing "spiteful" about my web page.
>> >>
>> >> [Spiteful implies a mean or malicious desire for (often petty) revenge.]
>> >> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful
>> >
>> >I do know what the word "spiteful" means. Not on my path.
>> >
>> >> >Ball has continually,
>> >> >spitefully, and IMMORALLY slandered many people on these groups
>> >> >over the years, myself included obviously, and my web page is a fun
>> >> >and convenient way to let others know exactly what we're dealing with.
>> >>
>> >> I used to think of it in that way, but I've come to think of it as
>> >> spiteful,
>> >> [a desire to inflict a wrong or injury on someone, usually in
>> >> return for one received.]
>> >> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful
>> >
>> >And you'll no doubt choose to continue to think of it in that way

>>
>> Of course, because there's no doubt that your web page
>> is spiteful,

>
>No. You are (spitefully) choosing to see it in that way.


No, I'm choosing to see it that way because it's the
given definition of the term, "spiteful".

>> [Spiteful implies a mean or malicious desire for (often petty)
>> revenge.]
>>
>> [a desire to inflict a wrong or injury on someone, usually in
>> return for one received.]
>>
>> >due to *your* spiteful feelings towards me. So more projection.

>>
>> No, due to the given definition of the term "spiteful", not due
>> to my feelings toward you. Like you say, "And [I'll] no doubt
>> choose to continue to think of it in THAT WAY." Rupert
>> should no better than to give in to "petty revenge". You, well,
>> maybe you don't know any better and can be excused.

>
>The definition(s) apply only in your imagination.


No, the definitions apply and are given here,
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful

[Spiteful implies a mean or malicious desire for (often petty)
revenge.]

[a desire to inflict a wrong or injury on someone, usually in
return for one received.]

>Neither Rupert
>or I lack valid arguments or require "revenge". And *why* are
>you trying to defend the person who inflicts a wrong or injury?


I'm not.