skirt-boy: burden of proof not met
On Aug 1, 7:29 pm, Dutch > wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Aug 1, 5:47 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >> Take it down, rupie. You are not authorized to post
> >> personal references and photos on your site.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Okay, well do you want to talk this over from the legal point of view?
>
> > Initially all I did was post a short excerpt from one of your posts in
> > the context of your full name. It didn't occur to me that it would be
> > an issue.
>
> Now that he has specifically requested that you not publish personal
> information about him, you should just take it down.
I've taken down the later changes I made. As for taking down the
actual name, we'll see. It's kind of an interesting concept, Jonathan
Ball asking me for a favour. We'll see how his negotiating skills
develop.
> What's more you
> ought to stop responding to him, it's not doing any good, he's just
> mocking you.
You've got the idea that I'd be better off not replying to him, well,
I'm having fun making fun of him for the moment, actually, so thanks
for the advice but I think I'll ignore it.
|