"Derek" > wrote in message ...
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:16:01 +0100, "pearl" > wrote:
> >"Derek" > wrote in message news
> >> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:17:16 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
> >> >On Aug 1, 5:17 pm, Derek > wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:30:39 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> [..]
> >> >>
> >> >> >Why?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because he hasn't given you his permission. Take it down.
> >> >
> >> >Could you elaborate? Is this a legal argument, or a moral argument?
> >>
> >> A moral one. Keep your arguments with him on Usenet, not on a web
> >> page which includes photographs and details of his whereabouts. You
> >> want to go down Lesley's spiteful little road?
> >
> >Threads can appear on quite a few forums as searchable web pages.
> >There is nothing "spiteful" about my web page.
>
> [Spiteful implies a mean or malicious desire for (often petty) revenge.]
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful

I do know what the word "spiteful" means. Not on my path.

> >Ball has continually,
> >spitefully, and IMMORALLY slandered many people on these groups
> >over the years, myself included obviously, and my web page is a fun
> >and convenient way to let others know exactly what we're dealing with.
>
> I used to think of it in that way, but I've come to think of it as
> spiteful,
> [a desire to inflict a wrong or injury on someone, usually in
> return for one received.]
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful

And you'll no doubt choose to continue to think of it in that way
due to *your* spiteful feelings towards me. So more projection.