On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:16:01 +0100, "pearl" > wrote:
>"Derek" > wrote in message news
>> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:17:16 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>> >On Aug 1, 5:17 pm, Derek > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:30:39 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> [..]
>> >>
>> >> >Why?
>> >>
>> >> Because he hasn't given you his permission. Take it down.
>> >
>> >Could you elaborate? Is this a legal argument, or a moral argument?
>>
>> A moral one. Keep your arguments with him on Usenet, not on a web
>> page which includes photographs and details of his whereabouts. You
>> want to go down Lesley's spiteful little road?
>
>Threads can appear on quite a few forums as searchable web pages.
>There is nothing "spiteful" about my web page.

[Spiteful implies a mean or malicious desire for (often petty) revenge.]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful

>Ball has continually,
>spitefully, and IMMORALLY slandered many people on these groups
>over the years, myself included obviously, and my web page is a fun
>and convenient way to let others know exactly what we're dealing with.

I used to think of it in that way, but I've come to think of it as
spiteful,
[a desire to inflict a wrong or injury on someone, usually in
return for one received.]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spiteful