View Single Post
  #1045 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Rudy Canoza[_1_] Rudy Canoza[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 282
Default The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate

Rupert wrote:
> On Jul 31, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Jul 30, 2:53 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 30, 2:22 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 1:55 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2:39 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 1:53 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 1:11 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 12:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Er, no.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good ol'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid fruity ****wit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boring.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's fairly entertaining most of the time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a masochist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who are "we",
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sensible folk. But not you.
>>>>>>>>>>> Sensible folk
>>>>>>>>>> ...but not you.
>>>>>>>>> Tell us more about how sensible people view the world
>>>>>>>> Go back and read my posts.
>>>>>>> Oh, I do.
>>>>>> Then you see that I already talk about how sensible
>>>>>> people view the world, and your demand that I tell you
>>>>>> more was disingenuous and, in your typical fashion,
>>>>>> dishonest.
>>>>> Yes, you make all sorts of interesting statements about how sensible
>>>>> people view the world
>>>> And so you are fully familiar with them, and your
>>>> bitchy demand that I supply more was disingenuous and
>>>> dishonest, which is what we have come always to expect
>>>> from you.
>>> Yes, I am fully familiar with them,

>> So, your petulant stamping of your dainty foot in
>> demanding more was disingenuous and dishonest.

>
> I really find it extraordinarily amusing that


rupie, you don't find any part of this amusing. You've
repeated that lie several dozen times, and it's
risible. You're infuriated. Cut the shit, boy.