On Jul 29, 1:53 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 1:11 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Jul 29, 12:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Er, no.
> >>>>>>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes.
> >>>>>>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the
> >>>>>>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And true.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Really?
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>>>> Good ol'
> >>>>>>>> Stupid fruity ****wit.
> >>>>>>> Boring.
> >>>>>> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it -
> >>>>>> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha!
> >>>>> It's fairly entertaining most of the time,
> >>>> You're a masochist.
> >>> You think?
> >> We know.
>
> > Who are "we",
>
> Sensible folk. But not you.
Sensible folk who do sensible things like try to critique a
mathematical paper armed with an online dictionary and absolutely no
knowledge of mathematics, and who publicly humiliate themselves by
tossing out childish insults like "whore" and "queer", while deluding
themselves into thinking that they are scoring points and make the
other person seethe with rage as opposed to howl with laughter, and
who challenge people to meet a burden of proof, and then, when the
challenge is met, feign falling asleep, and who make up silly stories
about things like people soliciting *** sex on houseboats or being
destined to be a career telemarketer despite having a Ph.D. in maths,
and then fail to appreciate the irony in their mocking someone for
having a history of mental illness? Those kind of sensible people?
That's what "sensible" is, is it, Ball?