On Jul 29, 1:11 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 12:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well,
> >>>>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit.
> >>>>>>>>> Er, no.
> >>>>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes.
> >>>>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the
> >>>>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Classic,
> >>>>>>>>>> And true.
> >>>>>>>>> Really?
> >>>>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>> Good ol'
> >>>>>> Stupid fruity ****wit.
> >>>>> Boring.
> >>>> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it -
> >>>> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha!
> >>> It's fairly entertaining most of the time,
> >> You're a masochist.
>
> > You think?
>
> We know.

Who are "we", Ball? Tell us all about this vast imaginary audience
that shares your warped view of reality.

How about when I was having fun with you when you tried to tell me
that "axiomatizable" wasn't a word? That was masochism on my part, was
it?