View Single Post
  #994 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Rudy Canoza[_1_] Rudy Canoza[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 282
Default The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate

Rupert wrote:
> On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped:
>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo.
>>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush
>>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity.
>>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well,
>>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit.
>>>>>>> Er, no.
>>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes.
>>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the
>>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour
>>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me?
>>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it
>>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage.
>>>>>>>>> Classic,
>>>>>>>> And true.
>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>> Good ol'
>>>> Stupid fruity ****wit.
>>> Boring.

>> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it -
>> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha!

>
> It's fairly entertaining most of the time,


You're a masochist.