On Jul 28, 10:58 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> On Jul 27, 4:13 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>
> > On Jul 27, 5:42 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> > > rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
> > > animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
> > > with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
> > > you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>
> > Why don't you have a go at writing some sort of reply to the file
> > called "animal rights talk.doc" he
>
> Why don't YOU have a go at justifying your most basic assertion?

What do you suppose that talk is? Have you read it?

That talk is a lecture I gave recently at the University of Sydney to
a group of students who were about to embark on animal research
projects. You are welcome to have a go at engaging with the arguments
in it if you feel like it.