Guppy the Corpse Pumper wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2:08 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> On Jul 27, 12:52 pm, shrubkiller > wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 27, 1:42 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>> rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
>>>> animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
>>>> with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
>>>> you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>>> Why would anyone have to prove something which is SELF EVIDENT?
>> It is not self-evident. In fact, it is more likely self-evidently
>> false.
>
>
> More proof that

The proposition of equal moral considerability of
animals (with humans) is self evidently false.