skirt-boy: burden of proof not met
On Jul 27, 4:13 pm, Rupert > wrote:
> On Jul 27, 5:42 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> > rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
> > animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
> > with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
> > you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>
> Why don't you have a go at writing some sort of reply to the file
> called "animal rights talk.doc" he
Why don't YOU have a go at justifying your most basic assertion?
|