The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
On Jun 13, 4:41 pm, Rupert > wrote:
> On Jun 13, 9:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 7:21 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 13, 12:03 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 12, 3:42 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 13, 12:14 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Rupert wrote:
> > > > > > > On Jun 12, 3:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> > > > > > >> Rupert wrote:
> > > > > > >>> On Jun 12, 1:44 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>> That does not contradict what I said.
> > > > > > >>>>>> It does, rupie. You know it does. You see a moral
> > > > > > >>>>>> dimension; K.M. denies it.
> > > > > > >>>>> That has never been in dispute.
> > > > > > >>>> Yes, you are denying it, stupid ****. You are denying
> > > > > > >>>> it when you say that K.M. sees it as morally justified.
> > > > > > >>> No, I'm not. K.M. clearly thinks that eating meat is morally
> > > > > > >>> permitted.
> > > > > > >> No. He thinks there is no moral issue underlying it at
> > > > > > >> all.
>
> > > > > > >>>> You are wrong; he does not see it as morally
> > > > > > >>>> justified. He sees it as not a moral issue at all, and
> > > > > > >>>> therefore not requiring moral justification.
> > > > > > >>> He doesn't think there's a serious moral case against it.
> > > > > > >> He thinks, correctly, that there's no moral issue to be
> > > > > > >> examined at all.
>
> > > > > > >>> He does think it's morally permitted.
> > > > > > >> No.
>
> > > > > > > Yes, of course he does.
>
> > > > > > No, ****witted rupie, he doesn't. You are engaging in
> > > > > > false bifurcation.
>
> > > > > It's not false bifurcation.
>
> > > > Of course it is, rupie, you stupid ****.
>
> > > No, it's not.
>
> > Of course it is, rupie. You do it again:
>
> > > Either something is morally permitted or it isn't.
>
> > WRONG, rupie. If there is no moral dimension to it, rupie, it is
> > NEITHER.
>
> > > > > It's true that you either think something
> > > > > is morally permitted or you don't.
>
> > > > No, that's FALSE, rupie - that's the false bifurcation. BOTH of those
> > > > assume that there is a moral issue.
>
> > > No, they do not.
>
> > YES, rupie, they do.
>
> > > > You're far too stupid for this, rupie. Boy.
>
> > > I'm afraid
>
> > So - you're far too stupid, and far too fearful. Get the **** out,
> > then.
>
> > > And I'm not a boy, I'm a 31-year-old man.
>
> > You're a BOY, rupie - a green, naive, isolated, inexperienced,
> > immature BOY. I've seen your photo on your website. It screams
> > "delicate BOY".
>
> By the way, your calling me immature is another priceless gem. When
> you impersonated pearl
Never did it.
> and fabricated a story about David Harrison
> having *** sex on a houseboat,
Not a fabrication. He did.
|