On 29 May 2007 17:59:08 -0700, "Whining, Crying, Bawl" > wrote:

>On May 28, 9:32 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>> "ricky's babysitter" > wrote in message
>>
>> ups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 28, 11:17 am, Goo wrote:
>> >> Dean Wormer wrote:
>> >> > Hello Rudy,
>>
>> >> > Thanks for posting this. It's too long, of course, but that's par for
>> >> > the course in these internet groups, isn't it.
>>
>> >> > Your main argument is actually quite elegant, and could be expressed
>> >> > in almost mathematical terms. Alas, it was not. Instead, you have
>> >> > let your fingers do your shouting, and you have succumbed to several
>> >> > nasty habits of the truly indignant, such as capitalizing things that
>> >> > read quite well without the inverted commas - including, as just one
>> >> > but probably the silliest example, the word "food" itself in the last
>> >> > paragraph.
>>
>> >> > Rudy, you are the sort of opponent that some of us on the other side
>> >> > (!) treasu intelligent, articulate, logical, etc.; and I for one
>> >> > look forward to seeing your argument expressed in plain English.
>>
>> >> > Yours,
>>
>> >> > D.W.
>>
>> >> Thanks for the constructive criticism regarding style.
>> >> It's a pity you couldn't address the substance.
>>
>> > That's because there wasn't any.
>>
>> According to Dean there was, in fact he called the arguments "elegant", he
>> just had no meaningful response, like you.
>
>
>
>"Elegant" but without SUBSTANCE

Exactly.

>you clueless ninny.

That's his most regular position.