View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Whining, Crying, Bawl Whining, Crying, Bawl is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate

On May 28, 9:32 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> "ricky's babysitter" > wrote in message
>
> ups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 11:17 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >> Dean Wormer wrote:
> >> > Hello Rudy,

>
> >> > Thanks for posting this. It's too long, of course, but that's par for
> >> > the course in these internet groups, isn't it.

>
> >> > Your main argument is actually quite elegant, and could be expressed
> >> > in almost mathematical terms. Alas, it was not. Instead, you have
> >> > let your fingers do your shouting, and you have succumbed to several
> >> > nasty habits of the truly indignant, such as capitalizing things that
> >> > read quite well without the inverted commas - including, as just one
> >> > but probably the silliest example, the word "food" itself in the last
> >> > paragraph.

>
> >> > Rudy, you are the sort of opponent that some of us on the other side
> >> > (!) treasu intelligent, articulate, logical, etc.; and I for one
> >> > look forward to seeing your argument expressed in plain English.

>
> >> > Yours,

>
> >> > D.W.

>
> >> Thanks for the constructive criticism regarding style.
> >> It's a pity you couldn't address the substance.

>
> > That's because there wasn't any.

>
> According to Dean there was, in fact he called the arguments "elegant", he
> just had no meaningful response, like you.




"Elegant" but without SUBSTANCE you clueless ninny.




- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -