"Bob" > wrote in message
...
> Charles Gifford wrote:
>
> > "Bob" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Frogleg wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 16:43:56 -0500, Bob > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>ASmith1946 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Like so many other foods, oysters are supposedly aphrodesiacs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Is this a 20th century invention or historically were oysters
> >> considered aphrodesiacs? Does this go back to the humoral system of
medicine?
> >>>>
> >>>>It goes back to the appearance of so many bivalves, mussels being the
> >>>>most obvious. They resemble labia with a small protrusion peeking out
> >>>>from between the "lips."
> >>>
> >>>So why isn't a banana considered an aphrodesiac? :-)
> >>
> >>You don't have a VHS or DVD player, do you?
> >
> > I must admit Bob, that you have lost me here. What are you talking
about?
>
> <LOL> Sorry for the obscurity. It was a far-fetched reference to the
> fact that there are various movies available for purchase and rental
> that, in fact, feature bananas and other unlikely items in connection
> with, shall we say, human sexuality. They're typically distinguishable
> by the cheesy 70's light jazz backgrounds with occasional moans and
> other "organic" sounds.
>
> Or so I've been told. No, seriously...
>
> Bob

I see. I feel uneducated. <grin> Thanks for the explanation!'

Charlie