"nemo" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Scott Smith" > wrote in message
> news
>>
>> "nemo" > wrote in message
>> . ..
>> >
>> > "billiemissy" > wrote in message
>> > oups.com...
>> >> lid wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > what about the plants rights?
>> >> > Ofcourse they need rights and RESPECT!
>> >> > We can't live without diversity!
>> >> > But it's not the same as animals! ANd you knows that very well!
>> >> > So, you better ask "Do animals have rights"?
>> >> > Animals can't speak but just like we, they all want to live!
>> >> > At some point they are even smarter than we!
>> >> > SO,
>> >> > they need it to have rights!
>> >> > And I hope very fast!
>> >> >
>> >> > BTW
>> >> > Every minute we grow with about 147 people in this world, EVERY
> MINUTE
>> > MAN!!!
>> >> > Shall we all still eating animal-products over 20 years? I don't
> think
>> > so!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > They are not here for suffering!
>> >>
>> >> billiemissy wrote:
>> >> obviously i agree with you but what power have we to stop animals and
>> >> plants suffering.
>> >> maybe we could come up with ideas what do you say
>> >>
>> >
>> > I've been Vegan for around 45 years. How many cows, sheep, chickens
>> > etc.
>> > is
>> > that that I've not eaten?
>> >
>> > Vegetarianism and Veganism and even Fruitarianism have increased hugely
>> > during those 45 years.
>>
>> In my opinion, that's due in large part to public health concerns rather
>> than animal rights concerns.
>>
> Your oppinion, like your grey matter, is seriously flawed.
Although you took my comment for trollbait, I was quite serious. Next time,
instead of tossing out an ad hominem, why not expound? Unlike a vast number
of Usenet participants who simply like to argue or offer inflammatory
comments for their own sake, I'll gladly concede your point if it's grounded
in reasonable argumentation.