On 17 Aug 2006 14:56:16 -0700, " > wrote:
>Derek wrote:
>> On 17 Aug 2006 13:28:27 -0700, " > wrote:
>>
>> >The process of artificial insemination, including the harvesting
>> >of male ejaculate, is not gratifiying for the female and is
>> >gratifying for the male.
>>
>> Then, according to your view where gratifying animals
>> sexually is permissible, you have no objection to the
>> harvesting of animal semen.
>
>I object on the grounds of animal commodification.

No, you don't object at all. You believe humans should
sexually gratify animals.

>> Way to go, you dirty little animal-fiddler.
>
>I have no relationship with animals requiring "fiddling".

You believe, as Karen does, that it is right and proper to
sexually gratify animals by being their sexual partner.
You endorse and promote zoophilia.