Derek wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2006 13:28:27 -0700, " > wrote:
>
> >The process of artificial insemination, including the harvesting
> >of male ejaculate, is not gratifiying for the female and is
> >gratifying for the male.
>
> Then, according to your view where gratifying animals
> sexually is permissible, you have no objection to the
> harvesting of animal semen.

I object on the grounds of animal commodification. If Karen was
marketing the cockatiel ejaculate, I would object, too.

> Way to go, you dirty little
> animal-fiddler.

I have no relationship with animals requiring "fiddling". When I do,
I'll let you know.