View Single Post
  #38 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 14-08-2006, 04:05 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan
Leif Erikson[_1_] Leif Erikson[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 213
Default Question for Chumpo

Karen Winter, child-abandoning shismatic bird-diddling
unachieving schismatic, lied:

pearl wrote:

snip

"Senor Chupacabra" condones men 'pleasuring' bulls.



Like most conservatives, Leif


I'm not a conservative.

You are a totalitarian statist.


and Chico condone anything which brings
in money.


No, Senor Chupacabra does not. Stop lying.


They have no objection if billions of beings live in boredom
and misery, and die in agony. They have no objection to "bestiality"
at all as long as somebody makes a profit on it. But allow a crippled
little creatures a bit of harmless pleasure in his old age, and, if it
involves genitalia, they go off into hysterical bellows of hypocritical
and pretended outrage.

I think artificial insemination of animals is completely immoral,


You can't make a coherent case why it is.