View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 14-08-2006, 03:20 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,
Glorfindel Glorfindel is offline
external usenet poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 109
Default Question for Chumpo

chico chupacabra wrote:


Glorfindel's allowing "her" bird to please himself wasn't for any
commercial or reproductive purpose.

That's absolutely true. It was for him, and completely his
own idea, not mine. I got nothing out of it except the
satisfaction of letting him do what he wanted to do, in a
way which harmed neither of us.

She saw it as "sweet" and gets off
on the idea that the bird liked her more than it liked other birds.

I think it is very sad that the experiences in his earlier
life had crippled him emotionally and psychologically as well
as physically. He was damaged in his mind as well as in his
body by what had been done to him by others before he came to
live with me. I wanted to do the best I could for him, given
his disabilities, and I think I succeeded.

And you do realize that you have just reversed yourself on
your original claim on this subject, and admitted you were
wrong. You now agree with what I said at the beginning.
What an idiot. You have no real knowledge of animal
behavior, you reversed your false scientific claim without
even admitting you were wrong, and, as usual, you invented
phony charges cloaked in equally phony spasms of fake moral